Fried Nathaniel M
Department of Physics and Optical Science, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, NC 28223, USA.
McKay Department of Urology, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC 28207, USA.
Biomed Opt Express. 2018 Aug 30;9(9):4552-4568. doi: 10.1364/BOE.9.004552. eCollection 2018 Sep 1.
The flashlamp-pumped, solid-state, pulsed, mid-infrared, holmium:YAG laser (λ = 2120 nm) has been the clinical gold standard laser for lithotripsy for over the past two decades. However, while the holmium laser is the dominant laser technology in ureteroscopy because it efficiently ablates all urinary stone types, this mature laser technology has several fundamental limitations. Alternative, mid-IR laser technologies, including a thulium fiber laser (λ = 1908 and 1940 nm), a thulium:YAG laser (λ = 2010 nm), and an erbium:YAG laser (λ = 2940 nm) have also been explored for lithotripsy. The capabilities and limitations of these mid-IR lasers are reviewed in the context of the quest for an ideal laser lithotripsy system capable of providing both rapid and safe ablation of urinary stones.
在过去二十多年里,闪光灯泵浦的固态脉冲中红外钬:钇铝石榴石激光(λ = 2120 nm)一直是用于碎石术的临床金标准激光。然而,尽管钬激光是输尿管镜检查中的主导激光技术,因为它能有效消融所有类型的尿路结石,但这种成熟的激光技术存在一些基本局限性。包括掺铥光纤激光(λ = 1908和1940 nm)、掺铥:钇铝石榴石激光(λ = 2010 nm)和掺铒:钇铝石榴石激光(λ = 2940 nm)在内的其他中红外激光技术也已被用于探索碎石术。在寻求一种能够快速、安全地消融尿路结石的理想激光碎石系统的背景下,对这些中红外激光的性能和局限性进行了综述。