Nie Tinghong, Chang Bojie, Tian Lili, Cao Shansong, Wang Junjie, Qi Haitao, Gao Lirong
Department of Stomotology, Tianjin Baodi Hospital/Baodi Clinical College of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 301800, China.
Emerg Med Int. 2022 Oct 17;2022:6389900. doi: 10.1155/2022/6389900. eCollection 2022.
To explore the correlation of complex impacted mandibular teeth and pericoronitis, as well as the effect of minimally invasive tooth extraction on patients' long-term outcomes of masticatory ability.
A total of 101 patients with complex impacted teeth who were treated in our hospital from March 2019 to June 2021 were selected and divided into the control group ( = 55) and the observation group ( = 46) according to the different treatment methods. The patients in the control group were given conventional extraction treatment, and the patients in the observation group were given minimally invasive extraction treatment. The clinicopathological features of patients complicated by pericoronitis were observed and the relationship between complex impacted mandibular teeth and pericoronitis was discussed. Additionally, we made statistics on operative time (OT), intraoperative blood loss (IBL), dental socket integrity score, and adverse reactions (ARs) and compared the clinical efficacy between the observation group and control group. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Oral Health Impact Profile scale (OHIP-14) were utilized for pain assessment and oral health status evaluation, respectively. Bite force (BF) and masticatory efficiency were also measured.
OG showed less OT and IBL than CG, with a higher dental socket integrity score ( < 0.05). In addition, OG outperformed CG with a higher overall response rate and a lower incidence of ARs ( < 0.05). The pretreatment VAS score, mouth-opening degree, and OHIP-14 score differed insignificantly between groups ( > 0.05). After treatment, the VAS score of OG decreased, while the mouth-opening degree and OHIP-14 score increased ( < 0.05). Finally, the mastication ability was higher in OG at 7 days postoperatively, but there was no difference between groups at 6 months postoperatively ( > 0.05).
Complex mandibular impacted teeth can easily induce pericoronitis, so clinicians should pay attention to the influencing factors of pericoronitis. Minimally invasive surgery for complex impacted mandibular teeth can effectively improve treatment outcomes, accelerate patient rehabilitation, and provide more effective protection for patients' oral health and masticatory ability, which is worth promoting in clinical use.
探讨复杂下颌阻生牙与冠周炎的相关性,以及微创拔牙对患者咀嚼能力长期预后的影响。
选取2019年3月至2021年6月在我院治疗的101例复杂阻生牙患者,根据治疗方法不同分为对照组(n = 55)和观察组(n = 46)。对照组患者给予传统拔牙治疗,观察组患者给予微创拔牙治疗。观察并发冠周炎患者的临床病理特征,探讨复杂下颌阻生牙与冠周炎的关系。此外,统计手术时间(OT)、术中出血量(IBL)、牙槽窝完整性评分和不良反应(ARs),比较观察组和对照组的临床疗效。分别采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和口腔健康影响程度量表(OHIP - 14)进行疼痛评估和口腔健康状况评价。同时测量咬合力(BF)和咀嚼效率。
观察组的手术时间和术中出血量均少于对照组,牙槽窝完整性评分更高(P < 0.05)。此外,观察组的总有效率更高,不良反应发生率更低,优于对照组(P < 0.05)。两组治疗前的VAS评分、开口度和OHIP - 14评分差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。治疗后,观察组的VAS评分降低,开口度和OHIP - 14评分升高(P < 0.05)。最后,术后7天观察组的咀嚼能力更高,但术后6个月两组之间无差异(P > 0.05)。
复杂下颌阻生牙易诱发冠周炎,临床医生应关注冠周炎的影响因素。复杂下颌阻生牙的微创手术能有效改善治疗效果,加速患者康复,为患者的口腔健康和咀嚼能力提供更有效的保护,值得临床推广应用。