• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[两种阻生牙拔除方法联合即刻种植的临床应用]

[Clinical application of two extraction methods of impacted teeth combined with immediate implantation].

作者信息

Song Yong, Li Xiang, Cai Man, Wang Yao-Hui

机构信息

Department of Stomatology, Suqian People's Hospital, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Group. Suqian 223800, Jiangsu Province, China. E-mail:

出版信息

Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2019 Dec;28(6):632-635.

PMID:32346709
Abstract

PURPOSE

To observe the effects of immediate implantation combined with high-speed turbine minimally invasive technology and traditional technology on postoperative analgesia, mouth opening and alveolar bone resorption after removal of complex impacted teeth.

METHODS

Eighty patients with impacted teeth treated in our hospital from January 2014 to December 2018 were randomly divided into 2 groups: experimental group and control group with 40 cases in each group. Patients in the experimental group were treated with high-speed turbine minimally invasive surgery combined with immediate implantation, while patients in the control group were treated with traditional surgery combined with immediate implantation. Differences in alveolar bone resorption, pain, swelling, limited mouth opening, intact extraction socket and complications were compared between the two groups. SPSS 19.0 software package was used to perform statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Three months after operation, the implant height of the maxillary anterior teeth, maxillary molar, mandibular anterior teeth and mandibular molar areas in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group. One day after operation, the VAS score of the experimental group was significantly lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). Three months after operation,there was no significant difference in VAS score between the two groups (P>0.05); but intact extraction socket, swelling degree and mouth opening limitation of the experimental group were significantly lower than those of the control group. The root fracture, adjacent teeth loosening, gingival tear, lingual bone plate fracture of the experimental group were significantly lower than those of the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

High-speed turbine minimally invasive treatment combined with immediate implantation after extraction of complex impacted teeth can significantly increase alveolar bone resorption, relieve swelling and preserve intact extraction socket, reduce pain and complications after operation. It is recommended to be popularized in clinic.

摘要

目的

观察高速涡轮微创技术联合即刻种植与传统技术在复杂阻生齿拔除术后镇痛、张口度及牙槽骨吸收方面的效果。

方法

选取2014年1月至2018年12月在我院治疗的80例阻生齿患者,随机分为2组:试验组和对照组,每组40例。试验组患者采用高速涡轮微创手术联合即刻种植治疗,对照组患者采用传统手术联合即刻种植治疗。比较两组患者牙槽骨吸收、疼痛、肿胀、张口受限、拔牙创完整性及并发症的差异。采用SPSS 19.0软件包进行统计分析。

结果

术后3个月,试验组上颌前牙区、上颌磨牙区、下颌前牙区及下颌磨牙区种植体高度显著低于对照组。术后1天,试验组视觉模拟评分(VAS)显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。术后3个月,两组VAS评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);但试验组拔牙创完整性、肿胀程度及张口受限程度显著低于对照组。试验组牙根折断、邻牙松动、牙龈撕裂、舌侧骨板骨折发生率显著低于对照组。

结论

复杂阻生齿拔除后采用高速涡轮微创治疗联合即刻种植可显著增加牙槽骨吸收,减轻肿胀,保持拔牙创完整性,减轻术后疼痛及并发症。建议在临床推广应用。

相似文献

1
[Clinical application of two extraction methods of impacted teeth combined with immediate implantation].[两种阻生牙拔除方法联合即刻种植的临床应用]
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2019 Dec;28(6):632-635.
2
[Evaluation of the results of high-speed handpiece and minimally invasive extraction in impacted mandibular third molar extraction].[高速手机与微创拔牙在下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除术中的效果评估]
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2015 Aug;24(4):489-92.
3
[Comparison of minimally invasive extraction and traditional method in the extraction of impacted mandibular third molar].[微创拔牙与传统方法在下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除术中的比较]
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2016 Oct;25(5):613-616.
4
Evaluation of deproteinised bovine bone matrix combined with absorbable biofilm for the preservation of extraction sites of mandibular impacted wisdom teeth.评价脱蛋白牛骨基质联合可吸收生物膜在保存下颌埋伏阻生智齿拔除位点中的作用。
Technol Health Care. 2024;32(2):695-704. doi: 10.3233/THC-230043.
5
[Comparison of two kinds of procedures used in the removal of horizontal impacted mandibular third molars].[两种用于拔除下颌水平阻生第三磨牙的手术方法的比较]
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2010 Feb;28(1):71-3.
6
[Clinical observation of minimally invasive extraction of lower third molar by retaining the buccal bone plate].保留颊侧骨板微创拔除下颌第三磨牙的临床观察
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2024 Feb;33(1):97-100.
7
[Evaluation of the effect of MTF-S on the removal of impacted mandibular wisdom teeth with complete or partial crown impaction].[评估MTF-S对拔除完全或部分冠部阻生的下颌阻生智齿的效果]
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2024 Feb;33(1):71-75.
8
[A study on effects of immediate bone grafting at mandibular first molar fresh extraction socket on maintaining alveolar bone height after space closure].[下颌第一磨牙新鲜拔牙窝即刻植骨对间隙关闭后牙槽骨高度维持影响的研究]
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2017 Nov 9;52(11):649-655. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1002-0098.2017.11.001.
9
[Comparative study on extraction of impacted mandibular wisdom teeth by Er:YAG laser and turbine handpiece].[铒激光与涡轮机手机拔除下颌阻生智齿的对比研究]
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2023 Feb;32(1):75-79.
10
[Applicational evaluation of split tooth extractions of upper molars using piezosurgery].[压电手术在上颌磨牙劈裂牙拔除术中的应用评价]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2016 Aug 18;48(4):709-713.

引用本文的文献

1
A Retrospective Study on the Effect of STA Anesthesia Technique in the Extraction of Impacted Teeth in Dental Outpatients and Its Impact on Patient Anxiety Levels.STA麻醉技术在口腔门诊患者阻生牙拔除中的效果及其对患者焦虑水平影响的回顾性研究
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2025 Jun 21;21:941-950. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S523718. eCollection 2025.
2
Correlation of Complex Impacted Mandibular Teeth with Pericoronitis and Effect of Minimally Invasive Tooth Extraction on Patients' Long-term Outcome of Masticatory Ability.复杂阻生下颌牙与冠周炎的相关性及微创拔牙对患者咀嚼能力长期预后的影响。
Emerg Med Int. 2022 Oct 17;2022:6389900. doi: 10.1155/2022/6389900. eCollection 2022.