• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[微创拔牙与传统方法在下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除术中的比较]

[Comparison of minimally invasive extraction and traditional method in the extraction of impacted mandibular third molar].

作者信息

Xu Fang, Zhang Hui-Xia

机构信息

Department of Stomatology, Zhengzhou First People's Hospital. Zhengzhou 450004, Henan Province, China. E-mail:

出版信息

Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2016 Oct;25(5):613-616.

PMID:28116438
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare minimally invasive extraction and traditional method in the extraction of impacted mandibular third molar.

METHODS

One hundred and sixty patients with impacted mandibular third molar were equally divided into two groups. Patients in the experimental group were treated with minimally invasive extraction, using implant machine and luxator, while patients in the control group were treated with traditional methods including use of orthodox chisel. The operation time, intraoperative and postoperative complications including deformation of extraction sockets, dry socket, limitation of mouth opening, pain and swelling, and fear were observed and compared between the two groups. The data were analyzed with SPSS18.0 software package.

RESULTS

The operation time was (17.32±1.01) min in the experimental group, significantly shorter than the control group which was (33.46±1.12)min (P<0.05); significant difference was found in the incidence of root fracture, medium or severe tooth sockets deformation and incidence of psychological fear during operation between the control group and experimental group(P<0.05); the degree of mouth opening after surgery, the incidence of moderate or severe pain after surgery was significantly lower in the experimental than in the control group(P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive extraction of mandibular impacted wisdom tooth is better than traditional method, with shorter operation time and less intraoperative and postoperative complications, which should be widely applied in clinic.

摘要

目的

比较微创拔牙术与传统方法拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙的效果。

方法

将160例下颌阻生第三磨牙患者平均分为两组。实验组采用微创拔牙术,使用种植机和牙挺,而对照组采用传统方法,包括使用传统凿子。观察并比较两组的手术时间、术中及术后并发症,包括拔牙窝变形、干槽症、张口受限、疼痛和肿胀以及恐惧情况。数据采用SPSS18.0软件包进行分析。

结果

实验组手术时间为(17.32±1.01)分钟,显著短于对照组的(33.46±1.12)分钟(P<0.05);对照组与实验组在牙根折断发生率、中重度牙槽窝变形发生率及术中心理恐惧发生率方面存在显著差异(P<0.05);实验组术后张口度、术后中重度疼痛发生率显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。

结论

下颌阻生智齿的微创拔牙术优于传统方法,手术时间短,术中及术后并发症少,应在临床上广泛应用。

相似文献

1
[Comparison of minimally invasive extraction and traditional method in the extraction of impacted mandibular third molar].[微创拔牙与传统方法在下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除术中的比较]
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2016 Oct;25(5):613-616.
2
[Evaluation of the results of high-speed handpiece and minimally invasive extraction in impacted mandibular third molar extraction].[高速手机与微创拔牙在下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除术中的效果评估]
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2015 Aug;24(4):489-92.
3
Influence of immediate post-extraction socket irrigation on development of alveolar osteitis after mandibular third molar removal: a prospective split-mouth study, preliminary report.即刻拔牙窝冲洗对下颌第三磨牙拔除后牙槽突炎发展的影响:一项前瞻性分牙窝对照研究,初步报告。
Br Dent J. 2012 Dec;213(12):597-601. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2012.1134.
4
[Crown cutting mode selection in extracting the mandible third molar by dental drilling system].[牙科钻孔系统在下颌第三磨牙拔除术中的冠切模式选择]
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2014 Sep;49(9):521-4.
5
[Clinical application of two extraction methods of impacted teeth combined with immediate implantation].[两种阻生牙拔除方法联合即刻种植的临床应用]
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2019 Dec;28(6):632-635.
6
Effect on wound healing of a topical gel containing amino acid and sodium hyaluronate applied to the alveolar socket after mandibular third molar extraction: A double-blind randomized controlled trial.含氨基酸和透明质酸钠的局部凝胶在下颌第三磨牙拔除后应用于牙槽窝对伤口愈合的影响:一项双盲随机对照试验。
Quintessence Int. 2018;49(10):831-840. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a41157.
7
Evaluation of treatment outcome after impacted mandibular third molar surgery with the use of autologous platelet-rich fibrin: a randomized controlled clinical study.使用自体富血小板纤维蛋白评估下颌阻生第三磨牙手术后的治疗效果:一项随机对照临床研究。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Jun;73(6):1042-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.11.013. Epub 2014 Dec 13.
8
Comparison of primary and secondary closure with a buccal mucosal-advancement flap on postoperative course after mandibular impacted third molar surgery.下颌阻生第三磨牙手术后,颊黏膜推进瓣一次缝合与二次缝合术后进程的比较。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Mar;24(1):37-43. doi: 10.1007/s10006-019-00814-w. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
9
[A comparative study of split-root and medial resistance removal in extraction of medially impacted tooth].[下颌阻生智齿拔除术中分根法与去骨法的对比研究]
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2012 Jun;21(3):344-9.
10
Can autologous platelet-rich plasma gel enhance healing after surgical extraction of mandibular third molars?自体富血小板血浆凝胶能否增强下颌第三磨牙手术拔除后的愈合?
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Sep;69(9):2305-10. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.014. Epub 2011 May 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical efficacy of magnet-assisted removal for dental high-speed dental handpiece broken Burs in mandibular third molar surgery: a retrospective study.磁辅助取出在下颌第三磨牙手术中折断于高速牙科手机的车针的临床疗效:一项回顾性研究
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 15;25(1):1161. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06513-1.
2
Correlation of Complex Impacted Mandibular Teeth with Pericoronitis and Effect of Minimally Invasive Tooth Extraction on Patients' Long-term Outcome of Masticatory Ability.复杂阻生下颌牙与冠周炎的相关性及微创拔牙对患者咀嚼能力长期预后的影响。
Emerg Med Int. 2022 Oct 17;2022:6389900. doi: 10.1155/2022/6389900. eCollection 2022.
3
Breakage and displacement of the high-speed hand-piece bur during impacted mandibular third molar extraction: three cases.
高速手机车针在拔除下颌第三磨牙时折断和移位:三例报告。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Jun 6;22(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02253-8.