Suppr超能文献

蛇伤干预研究的结果:系统评价。

Outcomes in intervention research on snakebite envenomation: a systematic review.

机构信息

Injury Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales,, Sydney, New South Wales, 2042, Australia.

Injury Division, The George Institute for Global Health, New Delhi, Delhi, 110025, India.

出版信息

F1000Res. 2022 Jun 8;11:628. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.122116.1. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A core outcome set (COS) is a minimal list of consensus outcomes that should be used in all intervention research in a specific domain. COS enhance the ability to undertake meaningful comparisons and to understand the benefits or harms of different treatments. A first step in developing a COS is to identify outcomes that have been used previously. We did this global systematic review to provide the foundation for development of a region-specific COS for snakebite envenomation.  Methods: We searched 15 electronic databases, eight trial registries, and reference lists of included studies to identify reports of relevant trials, protocols, registry records and systematic reviews. We extracted verbatim data on outcomes, their definitions, measures, and time-points. Outcomes were classified as per an existing outcome taxonomy, and we identified unique outcomes based on similarities in the definition and measurement of the verbatim outcomes.

RESULTS

We included 107 records for 97 studies which met our inclusion criteria. These reported 538 outcomes, with a wide variety of outcome measures, definitions, and time points for measurement. We consolidated these into 88 unique outcomes, which we classified into core areas of mortality (1, 1.14 %), life impact (6, 6.82%), resource use (15, 17.05%), adverse events (7, 7.95%), physiological/clinical (51, 57.95%), and composite (8, 9.09%) outcomes. The types of outcomes varied by the type of intervention, and by geographic region. Only 15 of the 97 trials (17.04%) listed Patient Related Outcome Measures (PROMS).

CONCLUSION

Trials evaluating interventions for snakebite demonstrate heterogeneity on outcomes and often omit important information related to outcome measurement (definitions, instruments, and time points). Developing high quality, region-specific COS for snakebite could inform the design of future trials and improve outcome reporting. Measurement of PROMS, resource use and life impact outcomes in trials on snakebite remains a gap.

摘要

简介

核心结局集(COS)是一个最小的共识结局列表,应在特定领域的所有干预研究中使用。COS 增强了进行有意义的比较以及理解不同治疗方法的益处或危害的能力。制定 COS 的第一步是确定以前使用过的结局。我们进行了这项全球系统评价,为制定特定地区的蛇咬伤核心结局集提供了基础。方法:我们搜索了 15 个电子数据库、8 个试验注册处和纳入研究的参考文献列表,以确定相关试验、方案、注册记录和系统评价的报告。我们提取了关于结局、定义、措施和时间点的逐字数据。根据现有结局分类法对结局进行分类,并根据逐字结局的定义和测量的相似性确定独特结局。

结果

我们纳入了 107 项符合纳入标准的记录,涉及 97 项研究。这些研究报告了 538 个结局,这些结局的测量方法、定义和时间点多种多样。我们将这些结果合并为 88 个独特的结局,将其分为死亡率核心领域(1,1.14%)、生活影响(6,6.82%)、资源使用(15,17.05%)、不良事件(7,7.95%)、生理/临床(51,57.95%)和复合结局(8,9.09%)。结局的类型因干预类型和地理位置而异。97 项试验中只有 15 项(17.04%)列出了患者相关结局测量(PROMs)。

结论

评估蛇咬伤干预措施的试验在结局方面存在异质性,并且经常遗漏与结局测量相关的重要信息(定义、工具和时间点)。为蛇咬伤制定高质量、特定地区的 COS 可以为未来试验的设计提供信息,并改善结局报告。在关于蛇咬伤的试验中,PROMs、资源使用和生活影响结局的测量仍然存在差距。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a999/9579743/c4311c6553a5/f1000research-11-134062-g0000.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验