• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Team diversity, conflict, and trust: Evidence from the health sector.团队多样性、冲突与信任:来自卫生部门的证据。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 10;13:935773. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.935773. eCollection 2022.
2
When Task Conflict Becomes Personal: The Impact of Perceived Team Performance.当任务冲突演变为个人冲突时:团队绩效感知的影响。
Small Group Res. 2016 Oct;47(5):569-604. doi: 10.1177/1046496416667816. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
3
Investigating the pathways between swift trust and team creativity among nursing student teams in Taiwan: A moderated mediation model.台湾护理专业学生团队中快速信任与团队创造力之间的路径探究:一个有调节的中介模型。
BMC Nurs. 2022 Dec 7;21(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-01118-3.
4
What hinders team innovation performance? Three-way interaction of destructive leadership, intra-team conflict, and organizational diversity.是什么阻碍了团队创新绩效?破坏性领导、团队内部冲突和组织多样性的三方互动。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 29;13:879412. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.879412. eCollection 2022.
5
Interprofessional nursing education and the role of swift trust and task conflict in team creativity: the mediating role of team interactive behaviors.跨专业护理教育以及迅速信任和任务冲突在团队创造力中的作用:团队互动行为的中介作用。
J Health Organ Manag. 2023 Oct 18;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2023-0028.
6
Conflict and interactions on interdisciplinary nursing student teams: The moderating effects of spontaneous communication.跨学科护理学生团队中的冲突与互动:自发沟通的调节作用。
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Nov;94:104562. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104562. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
7
The impact of team empowerment on proactivity: the moderating roles of leader's emotional intelligence and proactive personality.团队授权对主动性的影响:领导情绪智力和主动性人格的调节作用。
J Health Organ Manag. 2012;26(4-5):560-77. doi: 10.1108/14777261211256918.
8
How trust in coworkers fosters knowledge sharing in virtual teams? A multilevel moderated mediation model of psychological safety, team virtuality, and self-efficacy.同事间的信任如何促进虚拟团队中的知识共享?心理安全、团队虚拟性和自我效能感的多层次调节中介模型。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 2;13:899142. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.899142. eCollection 2022.
9
The relationship between swift trust and interaction behaviors on interdisciplinary and non-interdisciplinary teams in nursing education.护理教育中跨学科和非跨学科团队中快速信任与互动行为之间的关系。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2021 Feb;51:102977. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2021.102977. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
10
Processes in healthcare teams that include nurse practitioners: what do patients and families perceive to be effective?包括执业护士在内的医疗团队中的流程:患者和家属认为哪些是有效的?
J Clin Nurs. 2016 Mar;25(5-6):619-30. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13085. Epub 2016 Jan 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Family or otherwise: Exploring the impact of family motivation on job outcomes in collectivistic society.家庭因素或其他因素:探究集体主义社会中家庭动机对工作成果的影响。
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 2;14:889913. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.889913. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Refining a capability development framework for building successful consumer and staff partnerships in healthcare quality improvement: A coproduced eDelphi study.优化能力发展框架,以在医疗保健质量改进中建立成功的消费者和员工伙伴关系:一项共同制作的 e Delphi 研究。
Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1563-1579. doi: 10.1111/hex.13499. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
2
Unraveling the effects of cultural diversity in teams: A retrospective of research on multicultural work groups and an agenda for future research.剖析团队中文化多样性的影响:多元文化工作群体研究回顾与未来研究议程
J Int Bus Stud. 2021;52(1):4-22. doi: 10.1057/s41267-020-00389-9. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
3
The association between team-level social capital and individual-level work engagement: Differences between subtypes of social capital and the impact of intra-team agreement.团队层面社会资本与个体层面工作投入之间的关联:社会资本子类型的差异及团队内部一致性的影响。
Scand J Psychol. 2018 Apr;59(2):198-205. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12435. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
4
Training nurses in a competency framework to support adults with epilepsy and intellectual disability: the EpAID cluster RCT.在能力框架下培训护士以支持患有癫痫和智力残疾的成年人:EpAID 集群 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Feb;22(10):1-104. doi: 10.3310/hta22100.
5
The Five Attributes of a Supportive Midwifery Practice Climate: A Review of the Literature.支持性助产实践氛围的五个属性:文献综述
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2018 Jan;63(1):90-103. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12707. Epub 2018 Jan 27.
6
Employers' perception of the costs and the benefits of hiring individuals with autism spectrum disorder in open employment in Australia.澳大利亚雇主对在公开就业中雇佣自闭症谱系障碍患者的成本与收益的认知。
PLoS One. 2017 May 18;12(5):e0177607. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177607. eCollection 2017.
7
Does trust matter more in virtual teams? A meta-analysis of trust and team effectiveness considering virtuality and documentation as moderators.信任在虚拟团队中更重要吗?一项考虑虚拟性和文件记录作为调节变量的信任和团队有效性的元分析。
J Appl Psychol. 2016 Aug;101(8):1151-77. doi: 10.1037/apl0000113. Epub 2016 May 26.
8
Skewed task conflicts in teams: What happens when a few members see more conflict than the rest?团队中的任务冲突偏向:当少数成员看到的冲突比其他人多时会发生什么?
J Appl Psychol. 2016 Jul;101(7):1045-55. doi: 10.1037/apl0000059. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
9
Should we choose between problem-based learning and team-based learning? No, combine the best of both worlds!我们应该在基于问题的学习和基于团队的学习之间做出选择吗?不,要融合两者的优点!
Med Teach. 2015 Apr;37(4):354-9. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.948828. Epub 2014 Aug 26.
10
Explaining the justice-performance relationship: trust as exchange deepener or trust as uncertainty reducer?解析公正-绩效关系:信任是深化交换还是降低不确定性?
J Appl Psychol. 2012 Jan;97(1):1-15. doi: 10.1037/a0025208. Epub 2011 Sep 12.

团队多样性、冲突与信任:来自卫生部门的证据。

Team diversity, conflict, and trust: Evidence from the health sector.

作者信息

Nawaz Muhammad Rafay, Ishaq Muhammad Ishtiaq, Ahmad Rehan, Faisal Muhammad, Raza Ali

机构信息

Institute of Quality and Technology Management, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.

School of Management Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 10;13:935773. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.935773. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.935773
PMID:36300039
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9590623/
Abstract

The current study aims to determine the impact of diversity and intra-team trust on conflict within the health sector of Pakistan. This study also measures the moderating role of trust in the relationship between diversity and conflict among team members. Data was collected using personally administered questionnaires from 61 teams, including 377 respondents working in 4 public sector hospitals in Pakistan, which were selected using a simple random sampling technique. The results revealed that diversity (as a composite) positively influences task conflict, while its two components-surface-level diversity and deep-level diversity-are associated positively with task conflict. Moreover, the results also lead to an exciting finding that trust among team members could reduce the positive influence of diversity on team members' conflict. The implications for theory and practitioners are presented along with the avenues for future research directions.

摘要

当前的研究旨在确定多样性和团队内部信任对巴基斯坦卫生部门内部冲突的影响。本研究还衡量了信任在团队成员多样性与冲突关系中的调节作用。通过个人发放问卷的方式,从61个团队收集了数据,其中包括在巴基斯坦4家公立医院工作的377名受访者,这些医院是采用简单随机抽样技术选取的。结果显示,多样性(作为一个综合因素)对任务冲突有积极影响,而其两个组成部分——表面层次多样性和深层次多样性——与任务冲突呈正相关。此外,研究结果还得出了一个令人兴奋的发现,即团队成员之间的信任可以减少多样性对团队成员冲突的积极影响。本文还阐述了该研究对理论和实践者的启示以及未来研究方向。