• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当任务冲突演变为个人冲突时:团队绩效感知的影响。

When Task Conflict Becomes Personal: The Impact of Perceived Team Performance.

作者信息

Guenter Hannes, van Emmerik Hetty, Schreurs Bert, Kuypers Tom, van Iterson Ad, Notelaers Guy

机构信息

Maastricht University, The Netherlands.

Fontys International Business School, Venlo, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Small Group Res. 2016 Oct;47(5):569-604. doi: 10.1177/1046496416667816. Epub 2016 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1177/1046496416667816
PMID:28190944
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5256475/
Abstract

Although potentially beneficial, task conflict may threaten teams because it often leads to relationship conflict. Prior research has identified a set of interpersonal factors (e.g., team communication, team trust) that help attenuate this association. The purpose of this article is to provide an alternative perspective that focuses on the moderating role of performance-related factors (i.e., perceived team performance). Using social identity theory, we build a model that predicts how task conflict associates with growth in relationship conflict and how perceived team performance influences this association. We test a three-wave longitudinal model by means of random coefficient growth modeling, using data from 60 ongoing teams working in a health care organization. Results provide partial support for our hypotheses. Only when perceived team performance is low, do task conflicts relate with growth in relationship conflict. We conclude that perceived team performance seems to enable teams to uncouple task from relationship conflict.

摘要

尽管任务冲突可能有潜在益处,但它往往会引发关系冲突,从而对团队构成威胁。先前的研究已经确定了一系列有助于减弱这种关联的人际因素(例如,团队沟通、团队信任)。本文的目的是提供一个不同的视角,重点关注与绩效相关的因素(即感知到的团队绩效)的调节作用。利用社会认同理论,我们构建了一个模型,预测任务冲突如何与关系冲突的加剧相关联,以及感知到的团队绩效如何影响这种关联。我们通过随机系数增长模型对一个三波纵向模型进行了检验,使用了来自一家医疗保健机构中60个正在运作的团队的数据。结果为我们的假设提供了部分支持。只有当感知到的团队绩效较低时,任务冲突才与关系冲突的加剧相关。我们得出结论,感知到的团队绩效似乎使团队能够将任务冲突与关系冲突分离开来。

相似文献

1
When Task Conflict Becomes Personal: The Impact of Perceived Team Performance.当任务冲突演变为个人冲突时:团队绩效感知的影响。
Small Group Res. 2016 Oct;47(5):569-604. doi: 10.1177/1046496416667816. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
2
Skewed task conflicts in teams: What happens when a few members see more conflict than the rest?团队中的任务冲突偏向:当少数成员看到的冲突比其他人多时会发生什么?
J Appl Psychol. 2016 Jul;101(7):1045-55. doi: 10.1037/apl0000059. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
3
Moving beyond relationship and task conflict: toward a process-state perspective.超越关系冲突和任务冲突:走向过程-状态视角。
J Appl Psychol. 2013 Jul;98(4):559-78. doi: 10.1037/a0032896. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
4
Conflict in medical teams: opportunity or danger?医疗团队中的冲突:机会还是危险?
Med Educ. 2012 Oct;46(10):935-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04321.x.
5
Reaping the benefits of task conflict in teams: the critical role of team psychological safety climate.在团队中收获任务冲突的好处:团队心理安全氛围的关键作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2012 Jan;97(1):151-8. doi: 10.1037/a0024200. Epub 2011 Jul 4.
6
Ready to rumble: how team personality composition and task conflict interact to improve performance.准备好战斗:团队人格构成和任务冲突如何相互作用以提高绩效。
J Appl Psychol. 2013 Mar;98(2):385-92. doi: 10.1037/a0029845. Epub 2012 Sep 10.
7
Team diversity, conflict, and trust: Evidence from the health sector.团队多样性、冲突与信任:来自卫生部门的证据。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 10;13:935773. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.935773. eCollection 2022.
8
Perceived shared understanding in teams: The motivational effect of being 'on the same page'.团队中感知到的共同理解:“达成共识”的激励作用。
Br J Psychol. 2015 Aug;106(3):468-86. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12099. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
9
What is happening under the surface? Power, conflict and the performance of medical teams.表面之下正在发生什么?权力、冲突与医疗团队的表现。
Med Educ. 2012 Sep;46(9):838-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04322.x.
10
A contingency model of conflict and team effectiveness.冲突与团队效能的权变模型。
J Appl Psychol. 2011 Mar;96(2):391-400. doi: 10.1037/a0021340.

引用本文的文献

1
Conflict Management in Nursing: Analyzing Styles, Strategies, and Influencing Factors: A Systematic Review.护理中的冲突管理:分析风格、策略及影响因素:一项系统综述
Nurs Rep. 2024 Dec 23;14(4):4173-4192. doi: 10.3390/nursrep14040304.
2
Do Interpersonal Conflict, Aggression and Bullying at the Workplace Overlap? A Latent Class Modeling Approach.职场中的人际冲突、攻击行为和霸凌行为是否存在重叠?一种潜在类别建模方法。
Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 9;9:1743. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01743. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Outperforming whom? A multilevel study of performance-prove goal orientation, performance, and the moderating role of shared team identification.超越谁?绩效证明目标取向、绩效的多层次研究以及共享团队认同的调节作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Nov;100(6):1811-24. doi: 10.1037/a0038888. Epub 2015 May 25.
2
Tightening up the performance-pay linkage: roles of contingent reward leadership and profit-sharing in the cross-level influence of individual pay-for-performance.加强绩效薪酬关联:权变奖励领导和利润分享在个体绩效薪酬的跨层次影响中的作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Mar;100(2):417-30. doi: 10.1037/a0038282. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
3
Overcoming asymmetric goals in teams: the interactive roles of team learning orientation and team identification.
克服团队中的非对称目标:团队学习导向和团队认同的互动作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2015 May;100(3):735-48. doi: 10.1037/a0038315. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
4
Voluntary survey completion among team members: implications of noncompliance and missing data for multilevel research.团队成员自愿完成调查:不遵守和数据缺失对多层次研究的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2013 May;98(3):454-68. doi: 10.1037/a0031909. Epub 2013 Mar 4.
5
Future orientation, impulsivity, and problem behaviors: a longitudinal moderation model.未来定向、冲动性与问题行为:纵向调节模型。
Dev Psychol. 2011 Nov;47(6):1633-45. doi: 10.1037/a0025327. Epub 2011 Sep 5.
6
The paradox of intragroup conflict: a meta-analysis.群体内冲突的悖论:一项元分析。
J Appl Psychol. 2012 Mar;97(2):360-90. doi: 10.1037/a0024844. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
7
Using time-varying covariates in multilevel growth models.在多层次增长模型中使用时变协变量。
Front Psychol. 2010 Jun 14;1:17. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00017. eCollection 2010.
8
Motivating and demotivating forces in teams: cross-level influences of empowering leadership and relationship conflict.团队中的激励和减效因素:授权型领导和关系冲突的跨层次影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2011 May;96(3):541-57. doi: 10.1037/a0021886.
9
A contingency model of conflict and team effectiveness.冲突与团队效能的权变模型。
J Appl Psychol. 2011 Mar;96(2):391-400. doi: 10.1037/a0021340.
10
Task conflict and team creativity: a question of how much and when.任务冲突与团队创造力:多少与何时的问题。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Nov;95(6):1173-80. doi: 10.1037/a0020015.