Nova Southeastern University College of Pharmacy, Palm Beach Gardens, FL, USA.
J Pharm Pract. 2024 Apr;37(2):364-368. doi: 10.1177/08971900221136629. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
Studies have shown positive clinical outcomes in chronic conditions, such as hypertension, through pharmacist-delivered medication therapy management and medication adherence services. Given the need for social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic, increased utilization of telepharmacy strategies has been employed for managing blood pressure control. A retrospective single-center cohort study that compared in-person pharmacist visits and telepharmacy visits in primary care patients with hypertension via electronic chart review from January 2018 to July 2022. Subjects were included who were at least 18 years of age with hypertension. Comparator groups were patients who underwent an in-person pharmacy (pre-COVID-19) visit vs a telepharmacy visit (post-COVID-19). The primary outcome was the number of patients with controlled blood pressure based on a blood pressure goal of less than or equal to 130/80 following telepharmacy visit vs in-person visit. Medication adherence, pharmacist intervention, incidence of antihypertensive side-effects, and blood pressure maintenance based on a goal of ≤140/90 were also evaluated. A total of 77 patients were included. There was no difference in the primary outcome following in person pharmacy visits compared to telepharmacy visits ( = .690). There was also no difference found for the secondary endpoints of blood pressure goal less than or equal to 140/90 mmHg ( = .481), medication adherence ( = 1.00), or antihypertensive adverse events ( = .344). Telepharmacy visits had a nonsignificant change in blood pressure control when compared to in-person visits. Results suggest that the utilization of either in-person or telepharmacy strategies benefit the management of hypertension.
研究表明,药剂师提供的药物治疗管理和药物依从性服务在高血压等慢性病方面取得了积极的临床效果。鉴于在 COVID-19 大流行期间需要保持社交距离,已经采用了更多的远程药学策略来控制血压。这是一项回顾性单中心队列研究,通过电子病历审查比较了 2018 年 1 月至 2022 年 7 月期间初级保健高血压患者的面对面药剂师就诊和远程药学就诊。纳入的患者至少 18 岁,患有高血压。对照组为接受面对面药房(COVID-19 前)就诊和远程药学就诊(COVID-19 后)的患者。主要结果是根据远程药学就诊后血压目标小于或等于 130/80mmHg 的患者人数与面对面就诊相比。还评估了药物依从性、药剂师干预、降压药副作用发生率以及根据血压目标≤140/90mmHg 的血压维持情况。共有 77 名患者入选。面对面药房就诊与远程药学就诊后主要结局无差异(=0.690)。次要终点,即血压目标小于或等于 140/90mmHg(=0.481)、药物依从性(=1.00)或降压药副作用(=0.344)也无差异。与面对面就诊相比,远程药学就诊在血压控制方面的变化无统计学意义。结果表明,面对面或远程药学策略的使用都有利于高血压的管理。