Mackwood Matthew, Pashchenko Oleksandra, Leggett Christopher, Fontanet Constance, Skinner Jonathan, Fisher Elliott
Department of Community & Family Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Dartmouth Health, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA.
Telemed J E Health. 2024 Jun;30(6):e1677-e1688. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2023.0628. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
Objective:Examine the associations between rurality and low income with primary care telehealth utilization and hypertension outcomes across multiple years pre- and post-COVID-19 pandemic onset.
Methods:We compiled electronic health record data from the mixed rural/urban Dartmouth Health system in New Hampshire, United States, on patients with pre-existing hypertension or diabetes receiving primary care in the period before (January 2018-February 2020) and after the transition period to telehealth during the COVID-19 Pandemic (October 2020-December 2022). Stratifying by rurality and Medicaid enrollment, we examined changes in synchronous (office and telehealth visits, including audio/video use) and asynchronous (patient portal or telephone message) utilization, and control of mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) <140.
Results:Analysis included 46,520 patients, of whom 8.2% were Medicaid enrollees, 42.7% urban residents. Telehealth use rates were 12% for rural versus 6.4% for urban, and 15% for Medicaid versus 8.4% non-Medicaid. The overall postpandemic telehealth visit rate was 0.29 per patient per year. Rural patients had a larger increase in telehealth use (additional 0.21 per year, 95% CI, 0.19-0.23) compared with urban, as did Medicaid (0.32, 95% CI 0.29-0.36) compared with non-Medicaid. Among the 38,437 patients with hypertension, SBP control worsened from 83% to 79% of patients across periods. In multivariable analysis, rurality corresponded to worsened control rates compared with urban (additional 2.4% decrease, 95% CI 2.1-2.8%); Medicaid and telehealth use were not associated with worsened control.
Conclusions:Telehealth expansion enabled a higher shift to telehealth for rural and low-income patients without impairing hypertension management.
研究在2019冠状病毒病大流行前后的多年时间里,农村地区及低收入状况与初级保健远程医疗利用情况和高血压治疗结果之间的关联。
我们收集了美国新罕布什尔州达特茅斯混合农村/城市卫生系统的电子健康记录数据,这些数据涉及在2019冠状病毒病大流行之前(2018年1月至2020年2月)以及大流行期间向远程医疗过渡阶段之后(2020年10月至2022年12月)接受初级保健的高血压或糖尿病患者。我们按农村地区和医疗补助登记情况进行分层,研究同步(门诊和远程医疗就诊,包括音频/视频使用)和异步(患者门户网站或电话留言)利用情况的变化,以及平均收缩压(SBP)<140的控制情况。
分析纳入了46,520名患者,其中8.2%是医疗补助参保者,42.7%是城市居民。农村地区的远程医疗使用率为12%,城市地区为6.4%;医疗补助参保者为15%,非医疗补助参保者为8.4%。大流行后远程医疗就诊的总体年使用率为每名患者0.29次。与城市患者相比,农村患者的远程医疗使用增加幅度更大(每年增加0.21次,95%置信区间为0.19 - 0.23),医疗补助参保者与非医疗补助参保者相比也是如此(0.32次,95%置信区间为0.29 - 0.36)。在38,437名高血压患者中,各阶段收缩压得到控制的患者比例从83%降至79%。在多变量分析中,与城市地区相比,农村地区收缩压控制率恶化(额外降低2.4%,95%置信区间为2.1 - 2.8%);医疗补助和远程医疗使用与控制率恶化无关。
远程医疗的扩展使农村和低收入患者向远程医疗的转变更高,同时不影响高血压管理。