Unity Health Toronto - St. Michaels Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Department of Medicine and the Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Crit Care Med. 2022 Dec 1;50(12):1689-1700. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005674. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
Few surveys have focused on physician moral distress, burnout, and professional fulfilment. We assessed physician wellness and coping during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Cross-sectional survey using four validated instruments.
Sixty-two sites in Canada and the United States.
Attending physicians (adult, pediatric; intensivist, nonintensivist) who worked in North American ICUs.
None.
We analysed 431 questionnaires (43.3% response rate) from 25 states and eight provinces. Respondents were predominantly male (229 [55.6%]) and in practice for 11.8 ± 9.8 years. Compared with prepandemic, respondents reported significant intrapandemic increases in days worked/mo, ICU bed occupancy, and self-reported moral distress (240 [56.9%]) and burnout (259 [63.8%]). Of the 10 top-ranked items that incited moral distress, most pertained to regulatory/organizational ( n = 6) or local/institutional ( n = 2) issues or both ( n = 2). Average moral distress (95.6 ± 66.9), professional fulfilment (6.5 ± 2.1), and burnout scores (3.6 ± 2.0) were moderate with 227 physicians (54.6%) meeting burnout criteria. A significant dose-response existed between COVID-19 patient volume and moral distress scores. Physicians who worked more days/mo and more scheduled in-house nightshifts, especially combined with more unscheduled in-house nightshifts, experienced significantly more moral distress. One in five physicians used at least one maladaptive coping strategy. We identified four coping profiles (active/social, avoidant, mixed/ambivalent, infrequent) that were associated with significant differences across all wellness measures.
Despite moderate intrapandemic moral distress and burnout, physicians experienced moderate professional fulfilment. However, one in five physicians used at least one maladaptive coping strategy. We highlight potentially modifiable factors at individual, institutional, and regulatory levels to enhance physician wellness.
很少有调查关注医生的道德困境、倦怠和职业满足感。我们评估了 COVID-19 大流行期间医生的健康状况和应对方式。
使用四个经过验证的工具进行横断面调查。
加拿大和美国的 62 个地点。
在北美的 ICU 工作的主治医生(成人、儿科;重症监护、非重症监护)。
无。
我们分析了来自 25 个州和 8 个省的 431 份问卷(响应率为 43.3%)。受访者主要是男性(229[55.6%]),行医时间为 11.8±9.8 年。与大流行前相比,受访者报告说,工作天数/月、ICU 床位占用率和自我报告的道德困境(240[56.9%])和倦怠(259[63.8%])显著增加。在引发道德困境的 10 个排名最高的项目中,大多数涉及监管/组织(n=6)或地方/机构(n=2)问题,或两者兼而有之(n=2)。道德困境平均得分为 95.6±66.9,职业满意度平均得分为 6.5±2.1,倦怠得分平均得分为 3.6±2.0,227 名医生(54.6%)符合倦怠标准。COVID-19 患者数量与道德困境得分之间存在显著的剂量反应关系。工作天数/月越多、安排的院内夜班越多(尤其是与更多非计划性院内夜班相结合)的医生,经历的道德困境越严重。五分之一的医生至少使用了一种适应不良的应对策略。我们确定了四种应对模式(积极/社交、回避、混合/矛盾、不频繁),它们与所有健康指标都有显著差异。
尽管大流行期间道德困境和倦怠程度适中,但医生的职业满意度仍处于中等水平。然而,五分之一的医生至少使用了一种适应不良的应对策略。我们强调了个体、机构和监管层面上可能改变的因素,以增强医生的健康状况。