• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改善阿根廷公共卫生部门重症监护病房患者护理服务的质量改进合作。

Quality improvement collaborative for improving patient care delivery in Argentine public health sector intensive care units.

机构信息

Sociedad Argentina de Terapia Intensiva, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina

Hospital Interzonal General de Agudos General San Martín, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

出版信息

BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Jun 3;13(2):e002618. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002618.

DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002618
PMID:38830729
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11149125/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The demand for healthcare services during the COVID-19 pandemic was excessive for less-resourced settings, with intensive care units (ICUs) taking the heaviest toll.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to achieve adequate personal protective equipment (PPE) use in 90% of patient encounters, to reach 90% compliance with objectives of patient flow (OPF) and to provide emotional support tools to 90% of healthcare workers (HCWs).

METHODS

We conducted a quasi-experimental study with an interrupted time-series design in 14 ICUs in Argentina. We randomly selected adult critically ill patients admitted from July 2020 to July 2021 and active HCWs in the same period. We implemented a quality improvement collaborative (QIC) with a baseline phase (BP) and an intervention phase (IP). The QIC included learning sessions, periods of action and improvement cycles (plan-do-study-act) virtually coached by experts via platform web-based activities. The main study outcomes encompassed the following elements: proper utilisation of PPE, compliance with nine specific OPF using daily goal sheets through direct observations and utilisation of a web-based tool for tracking emotional well-being among HCWs.

RESULTS

We collected 7341 observations of PPE use (977 in BP and 6364 in IP) with an improvement in adequate use from 58.4% to 71.9% (RR 1.2, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.29, p<0.001). We observed 7428 patient encounters to evaluate compliance with 9 OPF (879 in BP and 6549 in IP) with an improvement in compliance from 53.9% to 67% (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.32, p<0.001). The results showed that HCWs did not use the support tool for self-mental health evaluation as much as expected.

CONCLUSION

A QIC was effective in improving healthcare processes and adequate PPE use, even in the context of a pandemic, indicating the possibility of expanding QIC networks nationwide to improve overall healthcare delivery. The limited reception of emotional support tools requires further analyses.

摘要

背景

在资源较少的环境中,对医疗保健服务的需求在 COVID-19 大流行期间过高,重症监护病房(ICU)承受了最大的损失。

目的

目的是使 90%的患者就诊时都能正确使用个人防护设备(PPE),使 90%的患者都能达到患者流程目标(OPF)的要求,并为 90%的医护人员(HCW)提供情绪支持工具。

方法

我们在阿根廷的 14 个 ICU 中进行了一项准实验研究,采用中断时间序列设计。我们随机选择了 2020 年 7 月至 2021 年 7 月期间入院的成年危重病患者和同期的活跃 HCW。我们实施了一项质量改进合作(QIC),包括一个基线阶段(BP)和一个干预阶段(IP)。QIC 包括学习课程、行动时期和改进周期(计划-做-研究-行动),这些都是由专家通过平台网络活动进行虚拟指导的。主要研究结果包括以下内容:正确使用 PPE,通过直接观察使用每日目标表遵守九项特定 OPF,以及使用基于网络的工具跟踪 HCW 的情绪健康状况。

结果

我们收集了 7341 次 PPE 使用观察(BP 中有 977 次,IP 中有 6364 次),正确使用的比例从 58.4%提高到 71.9%(RR 1.2,95%CI 1.17-1.29,p<0.001)。我们观察了 7428 次患者就诊,以评估遵守 9 项 OPF 的情况(BP 中有 879 次,IP 中有 6549 次),遵守率从 53.9%提高到 67%(RR 1.24,95%CI 1.17-1.32,p<0.001)。结果表明,HCW 并没有像预期的那样使用自我心理健康评估的支持工具。

结论

即使在大流行期间,质量改进合作也能有效地改善医疗流程和正确使用 PPE,这表明有可能在全国范围内扩大质量改进合作网络,以改善整体医疗服务的提供。情绪支持工具的接受程度有限,需要进一步分析。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e50/11149125/d71af3a2e91c/bmjoq-2023-002618f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e50/11149125/d43fe4aa31ea/bmjoq-2023-002618f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e50/11149125/d71af3a2e91c/bmjoq-2023-002618f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e50/11149125/d43fe4aa31ea/bmjoq-2023-002618f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e50/11149125/d71af3a2e91c/bmjoq-2023-002618f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Quality improvement collaborative for improving patient care delivery in Argentine public health sector intensive care units.改善阿根廷公共卫生部门重症监护病房患者护理服务的质量改进合作。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Jun 3;13(2):e002618. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002618.
2
Hydroxychloroquine plus personal protective equipment versus standard personal protective equipment alone for the prevention of COVID-19 infections among frontline healthcare workers: the HydrOxychloroquine Prophylaxis Evaluation(HOPE) trial: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.羟氯喹联合个人防护装备与单纯标准个人防护装备用于预防一线医护人员 COVID-19 感染的效果比较:羟氯喹预防评估(HOPE)试验:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Aug 31;21(1):754. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04679-3.
3
Access to personal protective equipment in healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom: results from a nationwide cohort study (UK-REACH).在英国 COVID-19 大流行期间医护人员个人防护设备的获取情况:一项全国范围队列研究(UK-REACH)的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 5;22(1):867. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08202-z.
4
Risk factors and frequency of COVID-19 among healthcare workers at a tertiary care centre in India: a case-control study.印度一家三级保健中心医护人员中 COVID-19 的危险因素和频率:病例对照研究。
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2021 May 8;115(5):551-556. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/trab047.
5
Personal protective equipment preparedness in Asia-Pacific intensive care units during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: A multinational survey.《2019 冠状病毒病大流行期间亚太地区重症监护病房个人防护设备准备情况:一项多国调查》。
Aust Crit Care. 2021 Mar;34(2):135-141. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2020.09.006. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
6
Personal protective equipment and adverse dermatological reactions among healthcare workers: Survey observations from the COVID-19 pandemic.医护人员的个人防护设备与不良皮肤反应:COVID-19 大流行中的调查观察。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Mar 4;101(9):e29003. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029003.
7
"One minute it's an airborne virus, then it's a droplet virus, and then it's like nobody really knows…": Experiences of pandemic PPE amongst Australian healthcare workers.“一分钟它还是空气传播病毒,然后又变成飞沫传播病毒,然后就好像没人真正知道……”:澳大利亚医护人员对抗疫个人防护装备的体验。
Infect Dis Health. 2022 May;27(2):71-80. doi: 10.1016/j.idh.2021.10.005. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
8
Compliance of healthcare workers to the proper use of personal protective equipment during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic.医护人员在 COVID-19 大流行第一波期间对正确使用个人防护设备的遵从情况。
J Infect Public Health. 2021 Oct;14(10):1404-1410. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2021.07.017. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
9
Perceptions of the Availability of Personal Protective Equipment and Its Association With Burnout Among US Healthcare Personnel During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic, 2020-2021.2020-2021 年 SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间美国医护人员对个人防护设备供应情况的看法及其与倦怠的关系。
J Occup Environ Med. 2023 Oct 1;65(10):e619-e625. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002926. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
10
Frontline healthcare workers' experiences with personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: a rapid qualitative appraisal.英国 COVID-19 大流行期间一线医护人员个人防护设备使用体验的快速定性评价。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 20;11(1):e046199. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046199.

引用本文的文献

1
Timely identification of deteriorating patients from acute respiratory infections at the primary care level in the COVID-19 era: quality improvement collaborative.2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间基层医疗中急性呼吸道感染患者病情恶化的及时识别:质量改进协作项目
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Jul 1;14(3):e003390. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003390.

本文引用的文献

1
High-level burnout in physicians and nurses working in adult ICUs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.成人 ICU 中工作的医师和护士的高度倦怠:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2023 Apr;49(4):387-400. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07025-8. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
2
Effect of ICU care bundles on long-term patient-relevant outcomes: a scoping review.ICU 护理包对长期与患者相关结局的影响:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 17;13(2):e070962. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070962.
3
Epidemiology and outcomes of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections in intensive care unit patients: the EUROBACT-2 international cohort study.
重症监护病房获得性血流感染患者的流行病学和结局:EUROBACT-2 国际队列研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2023 Feb;49(2):178-190. doi: 10.1007/s00134-022-06944-2. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
4
SHEA/IDSA/APIC Practice Recommendation: Strategies to prevent healthcare-associated infections through hand hygiene: 2022 Update.美国感染控制与流行病学专业人员协会/美国传染病学会/医疗机构内感染预防与控制实践标准委员会实践推荐:通过手卫生预防医源性感染的策略:2022 更新版。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023 Mar;44(3):355-376. doi: 10.1017/ice.2022.304. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
5
Evaluation of a National Quality Improvement Collaborative for Improving Cancer Screening.国家质量改进合作组织改善癌症筛查的评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Nov 1;5(11):e2242354. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.42354.
6
Wellness and Coping of Physicians Who Worked in ICUs During the Pandemic: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional North American Survey.在疫情期间在 ICU 工作的医生的健康和应对方式:一项多中心跨北美调查。
Crit Care Med. 2022 Dec 1;50(12):1689-1700. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005674. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
7
Multilevel approach to individual and organisational predictors of stress and fatigue among healthcare workers of a university hospital: a longitudinal study.大学医院医护人员压力和疲劳的个体及组织预测因素的多层次研究:一项纵向研究
Occup Environ Med. 2022 Aug 18;79(12):839-47. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2022-108220.
8
Contributing factors for acute stress in healthcare workers caring for COVID-19 patients in Argentina, Chile, Colombia, and Ecuador.阿根廷、智利、哥伦比亚和厄瓜多尔医护人员照顾 COVID-19 患者时急性应激的影响因素。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 19;12(1):8496. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12626-2.
9
Hand hygiene compliance among healthcare workers before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.医护人员在 COVID-19 大流行前后的手卫生依从性。
Am J Infect Control. 2022 Jul;50(7):719-723. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2022.03.014. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
10
Perceptions of Critical Care Shortages, Resource Use, and Provider Well-being During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Survey of 1,985 Health Care Providers in Brazil.《COVID-19 大流行期间对重症监护短缺、资源利用和医务人员健康状况的看法:对巴西 1985 名卫生保健提供者的调查》。
Chest. 2022 Jun;161(6):1526-1542. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.01.057. Epub 2022 Feb 10.