• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国的绿色增长与环境可持续性:环境税的作用。

Green growth and environmental sustainability in China: the role of environmental taxes.

作者信息

Yu Lei, Gao Xinwei, Lyu Junjie, Feng Yao, Zhang Shuliang, Andlib Zubaria

机构信息

School of Economics and Management, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao, 266580, China.

China Petroleum Engineering & Construction Corp. North China Company, Hebei, 062552, China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(9):22702-22711. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23355-4. Epub 2022 Oct 27.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-022-23355-4
PMID:36301397
Abstract

This study aims to investigate the impact of environmental-related taxes on green growth and CO2 emissions in China covering the time 1996-2019. To get the short- and long-run estimates, we have applied the bounds testing approach. Estimates of the study provide some important results. In the short run, environmental taxes and environmental policy stringency estimates are negatively significant in the CO2 emissions models and positively significant in the green growth models. Likewise, the long-run estimates attached to environmental taxes are significantly negative in the basic and robust CO2 emissions models while insignificant in the green growth models. However, the long-run estimates of environmental policy stringency are significantly negative in the basic and robust CO2 emissions models and significantly positive in the basic and robust green growth models. In general, our findings imply that an increase in environment-related taxes and strictness in environmental policies help reduce CO2 emissions and promote green growth in China.

摘要

本研究旨在考察1996 - 2019年期间与环境相关的税收对中国绿色增长和二氧化碳排放的影响。为了得到短期和长期估计结果,我们采用了边界检验方法。该研究的估计结果提供了一些重要结论。在短期内,环境税和环境政策严格性估计值在二氧化碳排放模型中具有显著负向影响,而在绿色增长模型中具有显著正向影响。同样,在基本和稳健的二氧化碳排放模型中,与环境税相关的长期估计值显著为负,而在绿色增长模型中则不显著。然而,在基本和稳健的二氧化碳排放模型中,环境政策严格性的长期估计值显著为负,而在基本和稳健的绿色增长模型中显著为正。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,与环境相关的税收增加以及环境政策的严格性有助于减少中国的二氧化碳排放并促进绿色增长。

相似文献

1
Green growth and environmental sustainability in China: the role of environmental taxes.中国的绿色增长与环境可持续性:环境税的作用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(9):22702-22711. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23355-4. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
2
Energy taxes, energy innovation, and green sustainability: empirical analysis from a China perspective.能源税、能源创新与绿色可持续性:来自中国视角的实证分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jul;30(34):82760-82769. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-27927-w. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
3
Do environmental taxes and environmental stringency policies reduce CO emissions? Evidence from 7 emerging economies.环境税和环境严格政策是否减少了 CO 排放?来自 7 个新兴经济体的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 May;28(18):22392-22408. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11475-8. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
4
Analyzing the role of environmental technologies and environmental policy stringency on green growth in China.分析环境技术和环境政策力度在中国绿色增长中的作用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Aug;29(37):55630-55638. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19673-2. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
5
Effect of environmental taxes on environmental innovation and carbon intensity in China: an empirical investigation.环境税对中国环境创新和碳强度的影响:一项实证研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Apr;30(19):57129-57141. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26299-5. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
6
Do transportation taxes promote pro-environmental behaviour? An empirical investigation.交通税能促进环保行为吗?一项实证研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(13):35545-35553. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24606-0. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
7
Dynamic relationship between green finance, environmental taxes, and CO emissions in transition toward circular economy: what causes what?向循环经济转型过程中绿色金融、环境税与 CO 排放的动态关系:何者为因?何者为果?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Sep;30(45):101511-101521. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-28912-z. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
8
Asymmetric effect of environment tax and spending on CO2 emissions of European Union.环境税和支出对欧盟二氧化碳排放的非对称影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Apr;31(18):27416-27431. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-32990-y. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
9
A predictive analysis of CO emissions, environmental policy stringency, and economic growth in China.中国二氧化碳排放、环境政策力度与经济增长的预测分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Jun;25(16):16091-16100. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-1849-x. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
10
Revealing the effectiveness of environmental policy stringency and environmental law on environmental performance: does asymmetry matter?揭示环境政策严格程度和环境法对环境绩效的有效性:非对称性是否重要?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Dec;29(60):91190-91200. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21992-3. Epub 2022 Jul 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Unraveling the nexus between fiscal policy uncertainty, environmental taxation, and life expectancy.解析财政政策不确定性、环境税与预期寿命之间的关系。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jun 6;25(1):2112. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23391-y.
2
Does green innovation reduce environmental degradation? A panel threshold analysis for BRICS countries.绿色创新能否减少环境退化?对金砖国家的面板门槛分析。
Heliyon. 2023 Nov 22;9(12):e22686. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22686. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Does green innovation moderate between FDI and environmental sustainability? Empirical evidence from South Asia.
绿色创新是否在外国直接投资和环境可持续性之间起到调节作用?来自南亚的经验证据。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 9;18(11):e0288532. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288532. eCollection 2023.
4
Effect of environmental NGOs on human health in China: An empirical analysis.环境非政府组织对中国人群健康的影响:一项实证分析。
PLoS One. 2023 May 17;18(5):e0284468. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284468. eCollection 2023.