School of Psychology and Wellbeing, University of Southern Queensland, Ipswich, Queensland, Australia.
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 27;17(10):e0276776. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276776. eCollection 2022.
The anonymity that the internet and social media affords users means that suicidal thoughts and/or behaviours can be talked about with a sense of freedom and disinhibition that is often not possible in face-to-face contexts. Better understanding online suicidal thoughts and/or behaviour talk is critical as more people turn to online spaces for support. Without this the potentiality of such spaces as sites for suicide prevention and intervention is likely to remain unrealised. Currently there are no scoping or systematic review syntheses focusing on internet and/or on social media suicidal thoughts and/or behaviour talk. This lack of synthesis is problematic as it makes it more difficult for online suicide prevention and intervention practices, policies, and our understanding of suicide to advance in a coherent and evidence-based manner. A scoping review protocol following Arksey and O'Malley's six-step modified framework has been developed to address this synthesis gap. It aims to systematically map the empirical literature that has investigated online suicidal thoughts and/or behaviours talk. It is anticipated that review outcomes could inform the training of health practitioners and peer/professional online moderators in how to best talk with people experiencing suicidal thoughts and/or behaviours. Outcomes could also form an evidence-base for developing policies and practices that focus on online places as safe spaces to talk about suicidal thoughts and/or behaviours. Developers of safe language guidelines could also use the outcomes to audit how well current guidelines reflect empirical evidence. Outcomes could enable researchers to design future online suicidal thoughts and/behaviours talk studies that extend our understandings of suicide leading to potential refinements of contemporary suicide theories/models.
互联网和社交媒体为用户提供的匿名性意味着,人们可以在这些平台上自由、无拘束地谈论自杀念头和/或行为,而这种自由和无拘束感在面对面交流中往往是不可能存在的。更好地理解在线自杀念头和/或行为的讨论至关重要,因为越来越多的人转向在线空间寻求支持。如果没有这种理解,这些在线空间作为预防和干预自杀的场所的潜力可能仍然无法实现。目前,没有专门针对互联网和/或社交媒体自杀念头和/或行为讨论的范围或系统综述综合。这种缺乏综合的情况很成问题,因为它使得在线自杀预防和干预实践、政策以及我们对自杀的理解更难以以连贯和基于证据的方式推进。已经制定了一个遵循 Arksey 和 O'Malley 的六步修改框架的范围综述方案,以解决这一综合差距。它旨在系统地绘制调查在线自杀念头和/或行为讨论的经验文献。预计审查结果可以为培训卫生保健从业者以及在线同行/专业主持人如何与经历自杀念头和/或行为的人进行最佳交谈提供信息。结果还可以为制定专注于将在线场所作为谈论自杀念头和/或行为的安全空间的政策和实践提供依据。安全语言指南的制定者也可以使用这些结果来审核当前指南如何反映经验证据。结果可以使研究人员能够设计未来的在线自杀念头和/或行为讨论研究,从而进一步加深我们对自杀的理解,从而可能对当代自杀理论/模型进行改进。