Department of Surgery, The Aga Khan Hospital, Dar es salaam, Tanzania.
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 27;17(10):e0276720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276720. eCollection 2022.
The increasing incidence of acute appendicitis in sub-Saharan Africa emphasizes the need for accurate and reliable diagnostic tools. However, the variability in the diagnostic performance of computed tomography for suspected acute appendicitis coupled with comparatively higher negative appendectomy rates in this setting highlight a possible concern regarding the diagnostic accuracy. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of a computed tomography scan for suspected acute appendicitis at the emergency department in Tanzania.
A retrospective diagnostic accuracy study was conducted from July to October 2020. All patients above 14 years of age who presented at the emergency department with right iliac fossa abdominal pain of fewer than ten days and underwent computed tomography for suspected acute appendicitis were evaluated, and the Alvarado score was computed. Histological diagnosis and clinical follow-up of 14 days were considered the reference standard. Ethical clearance was sought from the Aga Khan University Ethical review committee.
176 patients were included in this study. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were 100% (95% CI 91.8-100), 96.9% (95% CI 92.2-99.1), and 96.9% (95% CI 93.1-98.3), respectively. The mean Alvarado score in those without acute appendicitis was 4 (95% CI 3.7-4.3) compared to a mean score of 6.6 (95% CI 6.0-7.2) amongst those with acute appendicitis. The area under the receiver operator characteristics curve of computed tomography was 98.4%, and that of the Alvarado score was 84.1%.
The diagnostic performance of computed tomography in this study is similar to that established elsewhere. However, the Alvarado score is not routinely used for the initial screening of suspected acute appendicitis patients. A threshold of Alvarado score of 4 as a guide to conduct computed tomography for suspected acute appendicitis would have decreased computed tomography use by 50%, and missed 4 cases. Implementation studies that address Alvarado score use should be conducted.
在撒哈拉以南非洲,急性阑尾炎的发病率不断上升,这强调了对准确可靠的诊断工具的需求。然而,在这种情况下,计算机断层扫描(CT)对疑似急性阑尾炎的诊断性能存在差异,且阴性阑尾切除率相对较高,这突显了对诊断准确性的可能关注。本研究评估了坦桑尼亚急诊科 CT 扫描对疑似急性阑尾炎的诊断准确性。
本研究为回顾性诊断准确性研究,于 2020 年 7 月至 10 月进行。评估了所有 14 岁以上因右髂窝腹痛就诊时间少于 10 天且因疑似急性阑尾炎接受 CT 检查的患者,并计算了 Alvarado 评分。组织学诊断和 14 天的临床随访被视为参考标准。本研究已向 Aga Khan 大学伦理审查委员会寻求伦理批准。
本研究共纳入 176 例患者。敏感性、特异性和诊断准确性分别为 100%(95%CI 91.8-100)、96.9%(95%CI 92.2-99.1)和 96.9%(95%CI 93.1-98.3)。无急性阑尾炎的患者的平均 Alvarado 评分为 4 分(95%CI 3.7-4.3),而有急性阑尾炎的患者的平均评分为 6.6 分(95%CI 6.0-7.2)。CT 的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 98.4%,Alvarado 评分的曲线下面积为 84.1%。
本研究中 CT 的诊断性能与其他研究相似。然而,Alvarado 评分并未常规用于疑似急性阑尾炎患者的初始筛查。以 Alvarado 评分为 4 作为疑似急性阑尾炎行 CT 检查的指导,将使 CT 使用率降低 50%,并漏诊 4 例。应开展关于 Alvarado 评分使用的实施研究。