Suppr超能文献

胸主动脉腔内修复术治疗 B 型主动脉夹层的成本分析:质量成本是多少?

Cost Analysis of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in Type B Aortic Dissection: How Much Does Quality Cost?

机构信息

Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Velindre University NHS Trust, Health Education and Improvement Wales (HEIW), Cardiff, UK.

Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2023 Aug;94:38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.09.043. Epub 2022 Oct 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Aortic dissection (AD) is a life-threatening medical emergency that affects an estimated 3-4 people per 100,000 annually, with 40% of cases classified as type B AD (TBAD). TBAD can be further classified as being complicated (co-TBAD) or uncomplicated (un-TBAD) based on the presence or absence of certain features such as malperfusion and rupture. TBAD can be managed conservatively with optimal medical therapy (OMT), or invasively with open surgical repair (OSR) or thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), depending on several factors such as type of TBAD and its clinical acuity. The cost-effectiveness, or cost-benefit profile, of these strategies must be given equal consideration. However, TBAD studies featuring cost analyses are limited within the literature. This narrative review aims to address the gap in the literature on cost-effectiveness of TBAD treatments by providing an overview of cost analyses comparing OMT with TEVAR in un-TBAD and TEVAR with OSR in co-TBAD. Another aim is to provide a market analysis of the commercially available TEVAR devices.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed using several search engines including PubMed, Ovid, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Embase to identify and extract relevant studies.

RESULTS

Several TEVAR devices are available commercially on the global market costing $12,000-19,495. Nevertheless, the Terumo Aortic RELAY® stent graft seems to be the most cost-effective, yielding highly favourable clinical outcomes. Despite the higher initial cost of TEVAR, evidence in the literature strongly suggest that it is superior to OMT for un-TBAD on the long-term. In addition, TEVAR is well established in the literature as being gold-standard repair technique for co-TBAD, replacing OSR by offering a more optimal cost-benefit profile through lower costs and improved results.

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of TEVAR has revolutionized the field of aortovascular surgery by offering a highly efficacious and long-term cost-effective treatment for TBAD.

摘要

背景

主动脉夹层(AD)是一种危及生命的医学急症,每年每 10 万人中约有 3-4 人发病,其中 40%的病例为 B 型主动脉夹层(TBAD)。TBAD 可根据是否存在某些特征(如灌注不良和破裂)进一步分为复杂型(co-TBAD)或非复杂型(un-TBAD)。TBAD 可通过最佳药物治疗(OMT)进行保守治疗,也可通过开放手术修复(OSR)或胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)进行侵入性治疗,具体取决于 TBAD 类型及其临床严重程度等多种因素。这些策略的成本效益或成本效益状况必须同等考虑。然而,TBAD 研究中具有成本分析的研究在文献中是有限的。本叙述性综述旨在通过概述比较非复杂型 TBAD 中 OMT 与 TEVAR 和复杂型 TBAD 中 TEVAR 与 OSR 的成本分析,来解决 TBAD 治疗成本效益文献中的空白。另一个目的是对市售 TEVAR 设备进行市场分析。

方法

使用多个搜索引擎(包括 PubMed、Ovid、Google Scholar、Scopus 和 Embase)进行全面的文献检索,以确定并提取相关研究。

结果

几种 TEVAR 设备在全球市场上均有商业供应,价格为 12,000-19,495 美元。然而,Terumo Aortic RELAY®支架似乎是最具成本效益的,产生了非常有利的临床结果。尽管 TEVAR 的初始成本较高,但文献中的证据强烈表明,在长期内,它优于非复杂型 TBAD 的 OMT。此外,TEVAR 在文献中已被确立为 co-TBAD 的金标准修复技术,通过提供成本效益更高的结果来取代 OSR。

结论

TEVAR 的引入通过为 TBAD 提供一种高效且长期成本效益的治疗方法,彻底改变了主动脉血管外科学领域。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验