J Am Dent Assoc. 2022 Nov;153(11):1026-1040.e31. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2022.07.011.
Prevalence of ankyloglossia may vary depending on the assessment tool. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the prevalence of ankyloglossia in distinct age groups according to different assessment tools.
Nine electronic databases were searched from inception through November 2021 without restrictions of language or year of publication. Paired independent reviewers selected cross-sectional and cohort studies reporting the diagnosis of ankyloglossia, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality. The number of patients with ankyloglossia and the sample were extracted to calculate the overall prevalence of ankyloglossia and 95% CI. The authors calculated the prevalence of ankyloglossia per assessment tool, age group, and sex. They assessed the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.
Seventy-one studies were included. Seven different diagnostic tools were used. The overall prevalence of ankyloglossia was 5% (95% CI, 4.0% to 5.0%) and ranged from 2% (using an unspecific tool) to 20% (Coryllos classification). The prevalence per age group was higher in infants (7%). The prevalence ratio was 1.34 (95% CI, 1.17 to 1.54) for boys, with very low certainty of evidence.
The prevalence of ankyloglossia is higher among infants and differs depending on the assessment tool used for the diagnosis. It is uncertain whether boys are more affected by ankyloglossia than girls.
舌系带过紧的患病率可能因评估工具而异。本系统评价旨在根据不同的评估工具评估不同年龄组舌系带过紧的患病率。
从创建到 2021 年 11 月,我们检索了 9 个电子数据库,没有语言或出版年份的限制。配对的独立审查员选择了报告舌系带过紧诊断的横断面研究和队列研究,提取数据并评估方法学质量。提取了患有舌系带过紧的患者人数和样本,以计算舌系带过紧的总体患病率和 95%置信区间。作者计算了每种评估工具、年龄组和性别的舌系带过紧患病率。他们使用推荐评估、制定与评估方法评估证据的确定性。
共纳入 71 项研究。使用了七种不同的诊断工具。舌系带过紧的总体患病率为 5%(95%置信区间,4.0%至 5.0%),范围从 2%(使用非特异性工具)至 20%(Coryllos 分类)。各年龄组的患病率在婴儿中较高(7%)。男孩的患病率比为 1.34(95%置信区间,1.17 至 1.54),证据确定性极低。
婴儿中的舌系带过紧患病率较高,并且因用于诊断的评估工具而异。尚不确定男孩是否比女孩更容易受舌系带过紧的影响。