Moh D R, Badjé A, Kassi A N, Ntakpé J B, Kouame G M, Ouassa T, Danel C, Domoua S K, Anglaret X, Eholié S P
Unité pédagogique de dermatologie et infectiologie, UFR Sciences Médicales, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire; Programme PAC-CI, site ANRS de Côte d'Ivoire, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire; Inserm 1219, Université de Bordeaux, IRD, Bordeaux, France.
Programme PAC-CI, site ANRS de Côte d'Ivoire, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire; Inserm 1219, Université de Bordeaux, IRD, Bordeaux, France.
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2022 Nov;70(6):305-313. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2022.09.074. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
Tuberculosis remains a public health threat responsible as recently as 2018 for more than one million deaths. Chemoprophylaxis with isoniazid is one of the strategies implemented to control the disease. Although it is not yet widely prescribed, its utilization raises additional questions in the "test and treat" era of for anti-retroviral therapy. The objective of this study is to review the different randomized controlled trials of antitubercular Isoniazid Preventive Therapy (IPT). We have distinguished (a) "efficacy trials" (ET) comparing IPT to a placebo or the absence of chemoprophylaxis and (b) "IPT regimen trials" (RT) comparing IPT to one or several other regimens.
Literature search (keywords from published articles found in the Medline and Scopus data bases: "tuberculosis", "prophylaxis", "HIV", "randomized controlled trial") and standardized reading of selected articles reporting results from randomized trials of IPT in HIV-infected people.
Eighteen selected trials (11 ET and 7 RT), including 19,725 participants. The regimens studied were 3H, 6H, 9H, 12H, 12H, 36H/2RZ, 3RH, 3RZ, 3RHZ, and 3HP [H: Isoniazid, R: Rifampicin, Z: Pyrazinamide, P: Rifapentine].
Ten in Africa, three in Haiti, one in India, one in the USA, one in the Americas and two multi-continental trials. In ET with or without antiretrovirals (ART), IPT significantly reduces the risk of tuberculosis, by 32 to 71%. In ET prior to ART, IPT does not appear to reduce mortality. In ET in patients receiving ART, on the other hand, IPT reduces mortality. As regards RT, there seems to be no reason to prefer other regimens to IPT. Tolerance is good. Importantly, IPT may reduce (rather than worsen) the risk of multidrug-resistant bacilli selection by decreasing the number of TB episodes and, consequently, the number of curative tuberculosis treatments.
Far from becoming obsolete due to ARV treatment, IPT has remained a timely and relevant intervention.
结核病仍然是一种公共卫生威胁,仅在2018年就导致了超过100万人死亡。使用异烟肼进行化学预防是控制该疾病的策略之一。尽管其尚未得到广泛应用,但在抗逆转录病毒治疗的“检测与治疗”时代,其使用引发了更多问题。本研究的目的是回顾不同的抗结核异烟肼预防性治疗(IPT)随机对照试验。我们区分了(a)“疗效试验”(ET),将IPT与安慰剂或不进行化学预防进行比较,以及(b)“IPT方案试验”(RT),将IPT与一种或几种其他方案进行比较。
文献检索(从Medline和Scopus数据库中发表文章的关键词:“结核病”“预防”“HIV”“随机对照试验”),并对选定文章进行标准化阅读,这些文章报告了HIV感染者IPT随机试验的结果。
选定18项试验(11项ET和7项RT),包括19725名参与者。研究的方案有3H、6H、9H、12H、12H、36H/2RZ、3RH、3RZ、3RHZ和3HP [H:异烟肼,R:利福平,Z:吡嗪酰胺,P:利福喷汀]。
10项在非洲,3项在海地,1项在印度,1项在美国,1项在美洲,2项为多大陆试验。在有或没有抗逆转录病毒药物(ART)的ET中,IPT可显著降低结核病风险,降低幅度为32%至71%。在ART之前的ET中,IPT似乎不会降低死亡率。另一方面,在接受ART的患者的ET中,IPT可降低死亡率。至于RT,似乎没有理由偏好IPT之外的其他方案。耐受性良好。重要的是,IPT可能通过减少结核病发作次数,从而减少治愈性结核病治疗的次数,降低(而非增加)耐多药杆菌选择的风险。
IPT远未因抗逆转录病毒治疗而过时,仍然是一种及时且相关的干预措施。