University of Oslo, Department of Social Anthropology, Norway; University of Oslo, Institute of Health and Society, Norway.
University of Oslo, Institute of Health and Society, Norway.
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Feb;319:115258. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115258. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
The rise of universal health coverage (UHC) as a global policy endorsed in the Sustainable Development Goals (SGDs) appears to signal new directions in global health as it introduces a progressive language of inclusion, solidarity and social justice and advocates the right of 'everyone' to access the healthcare they need 'without financial hardship'. Since 2018 the Kenyan government has attempted to widen access to healthcare by experimenting with free health care services and expanding health insurance coverage. Such progressive moves are, however, layered onto histories of healthcare, citizenship and state responsibility that in Kenya have been dominated by forms of exclusion, differentiation, a politics of patronage, and class inequality, all of which work against universal access. In this paper, we follow recent attempts to increase access to healthcare, paying particular attention to how a language of rights and inclusion circulated among "ordinary citizens" as well as among the health workers and government officials tasked with implementing reforms. Despite being clothed in a language of universalism, solidarity and inclusion, Kenya's UHC reforms feed into an already fragmented and struggling healthcare system, reinforcing differentiated, limited and uneven access to healthcare services and reproducing inequity and exclusions. In this context, reforms for universal health coverage that promise a form of substantial citizenship are in tension with Kenyans' experiences of accessing healthcare. We explore how, amid vocal concerns about healthcare costs and state neglect, the promises and expectations surrounding universal health coverage reforms shaped the claims people made to accessing care. While our informants were cynical about these promises, they were also hopeful. The language of universality and inclusion drew people's attention to entrenched forms of inequality and difference, the limits of solidarity and the gaps between promises and realities, but it also generated expectations and a sense of new possibilities.
全民健康覆盖(UHC)作为可持续发展目标(SDGs)中得到全球认可的一项政策,似乎为全球卫生领域指明了新的方向,因为它采用了包容性、团结和社会正义的渐进式语言,并倡导“人人”有权“在没有经济困难的情况下”获得所需的医疗保健。自 2018 年以来,肯尼亚政府试图通过试行免费医疗服务和扩大医疗保险覆盖范围来扩大医疗保健的可及性。然而,这些进步举措是在肯尼亚以排斥、差异化、庇护政治和阶级不平等为特征的医疗保健、公民身份和国家责任历史基础上进行的,所有这些都阻碍了全民获得医疗保健的机会。在本文中,我们关注了肯尼亚为增加医疗保健可及性所做的努力,特别关注权利和包容的语言是如何在“普通公民”以及负责实施改革的卫生工作者和政府官员中传播的。尽管肯尼亚的 UHC 改革采用了普遍主义、团结和包容的语言,但它们加剧了已经支离破碎和困难重重的医疗保健系统,强化了差异化、有限和不平等的医疗保健服务获取,并再现了不平等和排斥。在这种情况下,承诺实质性公民身份的全民健康覆盖改革与肯尼亚人获得医疗保健的体验存在冲突。我们探讨了在人们对医疗保健成本和国家忽视的强烈关注中,全民健康覆盖改革所带来的期望和预期如何塑造了人们对获得医疗保健的主张。尽管我们的受访者对这些承诺持怀疑态度,但他们也抱有希望。普遍性和包容性的语言使人们关注到根深蒂固的不平等和差异形式、团结的局限性以及承诺与现实之间的差距,但它也产生了期望和新的可能性意识。