• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于句子的心理模拟:使用花园路径句的行为实验证据。

Sentence-based mental simulations: Evidence from behavioral experiments using garden-path sentences.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Language and Cognition Research Group, University of Tübingen, Schleichstr. 4, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.

Department of Cognitive Science, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2023 May;51(4):952-965. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01367-2. Epub 2022 Oct 28.

DOI:10.3758/s13421-022-01367-2
PMID:36307639
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10129931/
Abstract

Language comprehenders activate mental representations of sensorimotor experiences related to the content of utterances they process. However, it is still unclear whether these sensorimotor simulations are driven by associations with words or by a more complex process of meaning composition into larger linguistic expressions, such as sentences. In two experiments, we investigated whether comprehenders indeed create sentence-based simulations. Materials were constructed such that simulation effects could only emerge from sentence meaning and not from word-based associations alone. We additionally asked when during sentence processing these simulations are constructed, using a garden-path paradigm. Participants read either a garden-path sentence (e.g., "As Mary ate the egg was in the fridge") or a corresponding unambiguous control with the same meaning and words (e.g., "The egg was in the fridge as Mary ate"). Participants then judged whether a depicted entity was mentioned in the sentence or not. In both experiments, picture response times were faster when the picture was compatible (vs. incompatible) with the sentence-based interpretation of the target entity (e.g., both for garden-path and control sentence: an unpeeled egg), suggesting that participants created simulations based on the sentence content and only operating over the sentence as a whole.

摘要

语言理解者激活与他们处理的话语内容相关的感觉运动表象。然而,目前仍不清楚这些感觉运动模拟是由与单词的关联驱动的,还是由更复杂的意义构成过程驱动的,例如句子。在两项实验中,我们研究了理解者是否确实会创建基于句子的模拟。材料的构建使得模拟效应只能从句子的意义中产生,而不是仅仅从基于单词的关联中产生。我们还使用花园路径范式询问了在句子处理过程中何时构建这些模拟。参与者阅读了一个花园路径句子(例如,“当玛丽吃鸡蛋时,鸡蛋在冰箱里”)或具有相同含义和单词的相应明确控制句(例如,“当玛丽吃鸡蛋时,鸡蛋在冰箱里”)。然后,参与者判断所描述的实体是否在句子中提到。在两项实验中,当图片与目标实体的基于句子的解释(例如,花园路径句和控制句:未剥皮的鸡蛋)相匹配(与不匹配)时,图片的反应时间会更快,这表明参与者根据句子内容创建了模拟,并且仅在整个句子上运行。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/800c/10129931/d85644b7559d/13421_2022_1367_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/800c/10129931/6cf935abfbf7/13421_2022_1367_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/800c/10129931/2274250864d7/13421_2022_1367_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/800c/10129931/d85644b7559d/13421_2022_1367_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/800c/10129931/6cf935abfbf7/13421_2022_1367_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/800c/10129931/2274250864d7/13421_2022_1367_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/800c/10129931/d85644b7559d/13421_2022_1367_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Sentence-based mental simulations: Evidence from behavioral experiments using garden-path sentences.基于句子的心理模拟:使用花园路径句的行为实验证据。
Mem Cognit. 2023 May;51(4):952-965. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01367-2. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
2
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
3
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
4
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
5
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
6
A systematic review on production and comprehension of linguistic prosody in people with acquired language and communication disorders resulting from unilateral brain lesions.单侧脑损伤所致后天性语言和交流障碍患者的语言韵律产生和感知的系统评价
J Commun Disord. 2023 Jan-Feb;101:106298. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106298. Epub 2023 Jan 7.
7
To predict or not to predict: The role of context constraint and truth-value in negation processing.预测与否:语境限制和真值在否定处理中的作用。
Neuropsychologia. 2025 Sep 9;216:109167. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2025.109167. Epub 2025 May 29.
8
Diagnostic test accuracy and cost-effectiveness of tests for codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q in people with glioma.染色体臂 1p 和 19q 缺失的检测在胶质瘤患者中的诊断准确性和成本效益。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 2;3(3):CD013387. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013387.pub2.
9
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
10
Automated monitoring compared to standard care for the early detection of sepsis in critically ill patients.与标准护理相比,自动监测用于危重症患者脓毒症的早期检测
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 25;6(6):CD012404. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012404.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceptual representations in L1 and L2 spatial and abstract language processing: applying an innovative sentence-diagram verification paradigm.第一语言和第二语言在空间及抽象语言处理中的感知表征:应用创新的句子图表验证范式
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Oct 15;18:1425576. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1425576. eCollection 2024.
2
Modal and amodal cognition: an overarching principle in various domains of psychology.模态与非模态认知:心理学各领域的一个统领性原则。
Psychol Res. 2024 Mar;88(2):307-337. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01878-w. Epub 2023 Oct 17.

本文引用的文献

1
The action-sentence compatibility effect (ACE): Meta-analysis of a benchmark finding for embodiment.动作-句子兼容性效应(ACE):对体现的基准发现的元分析。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2022 Oct;230:103712. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103712. Epub 2022 Sep 11.
2
The experiential basis of compatibility effects in reading-by-rotating paradigms.旋转阅读范式中兼容性效应的经验基础。
Psychol Res. 2023 Feb;87(1):124-136. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01663-1. Epub 2022 Feb 27.
3
Replacing vertical actions by mouse movements: a web-suited paradigm for investigating vertical spatial associations.
用鼠标运动代替垂直动作:一种适用于研究垂直空间关联的网络范式。
Psychol Res. 2023 Feb;87(1):194-209. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01650-6. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
4
A pre-registered, multi-lab non-replication of the action-sentence compatibility effect (ACE).一项预先注册的、多实验室的动作句子兼容性效应(ACE)的非复制研究。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Apr;29(2):613-626. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01927-8. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
5
Estimating power in (generalized) linear mixed models: An open introduction and tutorial in R.在(广义)线性混合模型中估计功效:在 R 中的开放介绍和教程。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Dec;53(6):2528-2543. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01546-0. Epub 2021 May 5.
6
When words are upside down: Language-space associations in children and adults.当文字颠倒时:儿童和成人的语言-空间联想。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 Oct;186:142-158. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.06.001. Epub 2019 Jun 29.
7
How are mental simulations updated across sentences?心理模拟是如何在句子之间更新的?
Mem Cognit. 2019 Aug;47(6):1201-1214. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00928-2.
8
Are visual processes causally involved in "perceptual simulation" effects in the sentence-picture verification task?视觉过程是否在句子-图片验证任务中的“知觉模拟”效应中起因果作用?
Cognition. 2019 Jan;182:84-94. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.08.017. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
9
Embodied cognition: Is activation of the motor cortex essential for understanding action verbs?具身认知:运动皮层的激活对于理解动作动词至关重要吗?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Mar;44(3):335-370. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000451. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
10
Do I need to have my hands free to understand hand-related language? Investigating the functional relevance of experiential simulations.我需要解放双手才能理解与手相关的语言吗?探究体验式模拟的功能相关性。
Psychol Res. 2019 Apr;83(3):406-418. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0900-8. Epub 2017 Aug 2.