Suppr超能文献

成人在双列表自由回忆中主观语境检索的年龄差异。

Adult age differences in subjective context retrieval in dual-list free recall.

机构信息

Department of Behavioral Sciences, Millikin University, Decatur, IL United States.

Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States.

出版信息

Memory. 2023 Feb;31(2):218-233. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2022.2139846. Epub 2022 Oct 29.

Abstract

Age-related episodic memory deficits imply that older and younger adults differentially retrieve and monitor contextual features that indicate the source of studied information. Such differences have been shown in subjective reports during recognition and cued recall as well as process estimates derived from computational models of free recall organisation. The present study extends the subject report method to free recall to characterise age differences in context retrieval and monitoring, and to test assumptions from a context-based computational model. Older and younger adults studied two lists of semantically related words and then recalled from only the first or second list. After each recall, participants indicated their subjective context retrieval using remember/know judgments. Compared to younger adults, older adults showed lower recall accuracy and subjective reports of context retrieval (i.e., remember judgments) that were less specific to correct recalls. These differences appeared after first-recall attempts. Recall functions conditioned on serial positions were more continual across correct recalls from target lists and intrusions from non-target lists for older than younger adults. Together with other analyses of context retrieval and monitoring reported here, these findings suggest that older adults retrieved context less distinctively across the recall period, leading to greater perceived similarity for temporally contiguous lists.

摘要

年龄相关的情景记忆缺陷意味着老年人和年轻人在回忆和监控表明研究信息来源的上下文特征方面存在差异。这种差异在识别和线索回忆期间的主观报告中以及从自由回忆组织的计算模型中得出的过程估计中都得到了证明。本研究将主题报告方法扩展到自由回忆,以描述在上下文检索和监控方面的年龄差异,并检验基于上下文的计算模型的假设。老年人和年轻人学习了两组语义相关的单词,然后仅从第一组或第二组中进行回忆。每次回忆后,参与者使用记住/知道判断来表示他们的主观上下文检索。与年轻人相比,老年人的回忆准确性和对上下文检索的主观报告(即记住判断)较低,并且与正确回忆的关联性较低。这些差异出现在首次尝试回忆之后。对于来自目标列表的正确回忆和来自非目标列表的干扰,根据序列位置条件的回忆功能对于老年人来说比年轻人更持续。与这里报告的其他上下文检索和监控分析一起,这些发现表明老年人在回忆期间检索的上下文不那么独特,导致对时间连续的列表的感知相似性更大。

相似文献

1
Adult age differences in subjective context retrieval in dual-list free recall.
Memory. 2023 Feb;31(2):218-233. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2022.2139846. Epub 2022 Oct 29.
2
Age differences in the focus of retrieval: Evidence from dual-list free recall.
Psychol Aging. 2015 Dec;30(4):768-80. doi: 10.1037/pag0000049. Epub 2015 Aug 31.
3
Age differences in collaborative memory: the role of retrieval manipulations.
Mem Cognit. 2009 Oct;37(7):962-75. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.7.962.
4
Sensitivity of the hippocampus to objective but not subjective episodic memory judgments.
Cogn Neurosci. 2022 Jul;13(3-4):165-170. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2022.2033713. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
5
Modeling intrusions and correct recall in episodic memory: adult age differences in encoding of list context.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1993 May;19(3):617-37. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.19.3.617.
6
Adult age differences in production and monitoring in dual-list free recall.
Psychol Aging. 2017 Jun;32(4):338-353. doi: 10.1037/pag0000165. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
8
Adult age differences in the use of temporal and semantic context in dual-list free recall.
Psychol Aging. 2020 Feb;35(1):143-157. doi: 10.1037/pag0000425. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
9
How rich are false memories in a naturalistic context in healthy aging?
Memory. 2022 Mar;30(3):262-278. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2021.2006717. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
10
Testing can enhance episodic memory updating in younger and older adults.
Psychol Aging. 2023 Nov;38(7):656-669. doi: 10.1037/pag0000776. Epub 2023 Sep 4.

本文引用的文献

1
PEPPR: A post-encoding pre-production reinstatement model of dual-list free recall.
Mem Cognit. 2024 Jan;52(1):163-181. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01453-z. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
2
Adult age differences in specific and gist associative episodic memory across short- and long-term retention intervals.
Psychol Aging. 2022 Sep;37(6):681-697. doi: 10.1037/pag0000701. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
3
Face Validity of Remembering and Knowing: Empirical Consensus and Disagreement Between Participants and Researchers.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 Nov;15(6):1400-1422. doi: 10.1177/1745691620917672. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
4
A Specificity Principle of Memory: Evidence From Aging and Associative Memory.
Psychol Sci. 2020 Mar;31(3):316-331. doi: 10.1177/0956797620901760. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
5
Adult age differences in the use of temporal and semantic context in dual-list free recall.
Psychol Aging. 2020 Feb;35(1):143-157. doi: 10.1037/pag0000425. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
6
The language of accurate recognition memory.
Cognition. 2019 Nov;192:103988. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.05.025. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
8
Adult age differences in production and monitoring in dual-list free recall.
Psychol Aging. 2017 Jun;32(4):338-353. doi: 10.1037/pag0000165. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
10
A four-component model of age-related memory change.
Psychol Rev. 2016 Jan;123(1):23-69. doi: 10.1037/rev0000015. Epub 2015 Oct 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验