Suppr超能文献

记忆提取焦点中的年龄差异:来自双列表自由回忆的证据。

Age differences in the focus of retrieval: Evidence from dual-list free recall.

作者信息

Wahlheim Christopher N, Huff Mark J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Washington University.

出版信息

Psychol Aging. 2015 Dec;30(4):768-80. doi: 10.1037/pag0000049. Epub 2015 Aug 31.

Abstract

In the present experiment, we examined age differences in the focus of retrieval using a dual-list free recall paradigm. Younger and older adults studied 2 lists of unrelated words and recalled from the first list, the second list, or both lists. Older adults showed impaired use of control processes to recall items correctly from a target list and prevent intrusions. This pattern reflected a deficit in recollection verified using a process dissociation procedure. We examined the consequences of an age-related deficit in control processes on the focus of retrieval using measures of temporal organization. Evidence that older adults engaged a broader focus of retrieval than younger adults was shown clearly when participants were instructed to recall from both lists. First-recalled items originated from more distant positions across lists for older adults. We interpret older adults' broader retrieval orientation as consistent with their impaired ability to elaborate cues to constrain retrieval. These findings show that age-related deficits in control processes impair context reinstatement and the subsequent focus of retrieval to target episodes.

摘要

在本实验中,我们使用双列表自由回忆范式研究了检索焦点的年龄差异。年轻和年长的成年人学习了两组不相关的单词,并从第一组列表、第二组列表或两组列表中进行回忆。年长的成年人在使用控制过程从目标列表中正确回忆项目并防止干扰方面表现受损。这种模式反映了使用过程分离程序验证的回忆缺陷。我们使用时间组织测量方法研究了控制过程中与年龄相关的缺陷对检索焦点的影响。当参与者被要求从两组列表中进行回忆时,年长的成年人比年轻的成年人检索焦点更宽泛这一证据清晰地显现出来。对于年长的成年人,首次回忆的项目来自于两组列表中更远的位置。我们将年长的成年人更宽泛的检索取向解释为与他们在详细阐述线索以限制检索方面受损的能力相一致。这些发现表明,控制过程中与年龄相关的缺陷会损害情境恢复以及随后对目标事件的检索焦点。

相似文献

1
Age differences in the focus of retrieval: Evidence from dual-list free recall.
Psychol Aging. 2015 Dec;30(4):768-80. doi: 10.1037/pag0000049. Epub 2015 Aug 31.
3
Adult age differences in production and monitoring in dual-list free recall.
Psychol Aging. 2017 Jun;32(4):338-353. doi: 10.1037/pag0000165. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
4
Adult age differences in subjective context retrieval in dual-list free recall.
Memory. 2023 Feb;31(2):218-233. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2022.2139846. Epub 2022 Oct 29.
5
Adult age differences in the use of temporal and semantic context in dual-list free recall.
Psychol Aging. 2020 Feb;35(1):143-157. doi: 10.1037/pag0000425. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
6
Part-list cuing effects in younger and older adults' episodic recall.
Psychol Aging. 2019 Mar;34(2):262-267. doi: 10.1037/pag0000268. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
7
Age differences in collaborative memory: the role of retrieval manipulations.
Mem Cognit. 2009 Oct;37(7):962-75. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.7.962.
9
Age-related deficits in associative memory: the influence of impaired strategic retrieval.
Psychol Aging. 2008 Mar;23(1):93-103. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.23.1.93.
10
Older adults show deficits in retrieving and decoding associative mediators generated at study.
Dev Psychol. 2013 Jun;49(6):1127-31. doi: 10.1037/a0029414. Epub 2012 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

1
How retrieval processes change with age: Exploring age differences in semantic network and retrieval dynamics.
Can J Exp Psychol. 2025 Mar;79(1):109-123. doi: 10.1037/cep0000332. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
2
The Penn Electrophysiology of Encoding and Retrieval Study.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2024 Sep;50(9):1421-1443. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001319. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
3
The influence of emotion on temporal context models.
Cogn Emot. 2025 Feb;39(1):18-46. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2024.2371075. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
4
The drawing effect: Evidence for costs and benefits using pure and mixed lists.
Mem Cognit. 2024 Aug;52(6):1408-1421. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01551-6. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
5
Semantic associations restore neural encoding mechanisms.
Learn Mem. 2024 Mar 19;31(3). doi: 10.1101/lm.053996.124. Print 2024 Mar.
6
Adult age differences in subjective context retrieval in dual-list free recall.
Memory. 2023 Feb;31(2):218-233. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2022.2139846. Epub 2022 Oct 29.
8
The lrd package: An R package and Shiny application for processing lexical data.
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Aug;54(4):2001-2024. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01718-y. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
9
The dynamics of memory for United States presidents in younger and older adults.
Memory. 2021 Oct;29(9):1232-1244. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2021.1974050. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
10
Performance on the processing portion of complex working memory span tasks is related to working memory capacity estimates.
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Apr;54(2):780-794. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01645-y. Epub 2021 Aug 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Memory consequences of looking back to notice change: Retroactive and proactive facilitation.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Sep;41(5):1282-97. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000123. Epub 2015 May 25.
4
Hyper-binding across time: age differences in the effect of temporal proximity on paired-associate learning.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Jan;40(1):293-9. doi: 10.1037/a0034109. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
5
The role of reminding in the effects of spaced repetitions on cued recall: sufficient but not necessary.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Jan;40(1):94-105. doi: 10.1037/a0034055. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
6
Focusing the search: proactive and retroactive interference and the dynamics of free recall.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Nov;39(6):1742-56. doi: 10.1037/a0033743. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
7
Rethinking Familiarity: Remember/Know Judgments in Free Recall.
J Mem Lang. 2013 May 1;68(4):333-349. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2013.01.001.
10
A context maintenance and retrieval model of organizational processes in free recall.
Psychol Rev. 2009 Jan;116(1):129-56. doi: 10.1037/a0014420.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验