Yu Qiuxia, Zhang Xiaoying, Wang Na, Li Chunrui, Zhang Yicheng, Zhou Jianfeng, Wang Gaoxiang, Cao Yang
Department of Hematology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China.
Department of Hematology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China.
Radiother Oncol. 2022 Dec;177:53-60. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.10.018. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
We aimed to analyze the safety and efficacy of a radiation bridging regimen with or without chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone prior to CAR T-cell treatment for relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell lymphoma (r/r ABL).
In this study, 45 out of 105 patients enrolled in CD19/22 CAR T-cell "cocktail" clinical trial were excluded, including 34 patients without bridging treatment. Total 60 patients receiving CAR T-cell therapies with bridging regimens as chemotherapy alone (C-CAR-T group, n = 31), and radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy (R-CAR-T group, n = 29) between February 2017 and October 2020 were retrospectively analyzed.
No significant toxicities were identified in the R-CAR-T group, and no patients in either group experienced CAR-T-related deaths. However, the R-CAR-T group showed a lower incidence of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) of grade ≥ 3 relative to the C-CAR-T group (0% vs 19.4%, P = 0.036). The incidence of neurological toxicity was 9.9% and 6.9% in the C-CAR-T group and R-CAR-T group, respectively (P = 0.697). The R-CAR-T group achieved a higher overall response rate (ORR) at the day 30 assessment (82.8% vs 45.2%, P = 0.0025). Further analyzing the outcomes, the R-CAR-T group presented a better 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate than the C-CAR-T group (46.9% vs 22.6%, P = 0.0356). Intriguingly, the bridging radiation regimen extremely improved the 6-month PFS (50.8% vs 16. 7%, P = 0.0369) and 1-year overall survival (OS) (56.3% vs 33.3%, P = 0.0236) rates in patients with bulky disease. The study also found that conducting radiotherapy as a bridging regimen was an independent factor that predicted better PFS (HR: 0.534, 95% CI: 0.289-0.987, P = 0.045).
Our results provide and strengthen novel insights that the use of radiotherapy as a bridging strategy was demonstrated to reduce the incidence of severe CRS and improve the PFS of patients. In subgroup analysis, it was confirmed that radiotherapy can improve PFS and OS in patients with bulky disease. These findings open new avenues to improve the efficacy and safety of CAR T-cell therapy.
我们旨在分析在嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞治疗复发/难治性侵袭性B细胞淋巴瘤(r/r ABL)之前,采用或不采用化疗的放疗桥接方案与单纯化疗相比的安全性和疗效。
在本研究中,105名参加CD19/22 CAR T细胞“鸡尾酒”临床试验的患者中有45名被排除,其中34名患者未接受桥接治疗。回顾性分析了2017年2月至2020年10月期间接受CAR T细胞治疗并采用单纯化疗作为桥接方案(C-CAR-T组,n = 31)以及采用放疗联合或不联合化疗作为桥接方案(R-CAR-T组,n = 29)的60名患者。
R-CAR-T组未发现明显毒性,两组均无患者发生与CAR-T相关的死亡。然而,与C-CAR-T组相比,R-CAR-T组≥3级细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)的发生率较低(0%对19.4%,P = 0.036)。C-CAR-T组和R-CAR-T组的神经毒性发生率分别为9.9%和6.9%(P = 0.697)。在第30天评估时,R-CAR-T组的总缓解率(ORR)更高(82.8%对45.2%,P = 0.0025)。进一步分析结果显示,R-CAR-T组的1年无进展生存期(PFS)率优于C-CAR-T组(46.9%对22.6%,P = 0.0356)。有趣的是,桥接放疗方案极大地提高了肿块较大患者的6个月PFS(50.8%对16.7%,P = 0.0369)和1年总生存期(OS)(56.3%对33.3%,P = 0.0236)率。该研究还发现,采用放疗作为桥接方案是预测更好PFS的独立因素(风险比:0.534,95%置信区间:0.289 - 0.987,P = 0.045)。
我们的结果提供并强化了新的见解,即采用放疗作为桥接策略可降低严重CRS的发生率并改善患者的PFS。在亚组分析中,证实放疗可改善肿块较大患者的PFS和OS。这些发现为提高CAR T细胞治疗的疗效和安全性开辟了新途径。