Suppr超能文献

特定原因死亡率的时间趋势:爱沙尼亚和立陶宛比较,2001-2019 年。

The temporal trend of cause-specific mortality: comparing Estonia and Lithuania, 2001 - 2019.

机构信息

Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), 33 Ursula Franklin Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 2S1, Canada.

Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, CAMH, 250 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 1R8, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2022 Oct 30;22(1):1984. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14354-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite being two Baltic countries with similar histories, Estonia and Lithuania have diverged in life expectancy trends in recent years. We investigated this divergence by comparing cause-specific mortality trends.

METHODS

We obtained yearly mortality data for individuals 20 + years of age from 2001-2019 (19 years worth of data) through Statistics Lithuania, the Lithuanian Institute for Hygiene, and the National Institute for Health Development (Estonia). Using ICD-10 codes, we analyzed all-cause mortality rates and created eight major disease categories: ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, all other cardiovascular disease, cancers (neoplasms), digestive diseases, self-harm and interpersonal violence, unintentional injuries and related conditions, and other mortality (deaths per 100,000 population). We used joinpoint regression analysis, and analyzed the proportional contribution of each category to all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

There was a steeper decline in all-cause mortality in Estonia (average annual percent change, AAPC = -2.55%, 95% CI: [-2.91%, -2.20%], P < .001) as compared to Lithuania (AAPC = -1.26%, 95% CI: [-2.18%, -0.57%], P = .001). For ischemic heart disease mortality Estonia exhibited a relatively larger decline over the 19-year period (AAPC = -6.61%, 95% CI: [-7.02%, -6.21%], P < .001) as compared to Lithuania (AAPC = -2.23%, 95% CI: [-3.40%, -1.04%], P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Estonia and Lithuania showed distinct mortality trends and distributions of major disease categories. Our findings highlight the role of ischemic heart disease mortality. Differences in public health care, management and prevention of ischemic heart disease, alcohol control policies may explain these differences.

摘要

背景

尽管爱沙尼亚和立陶宛是两个具有相似历史的波罗的海国家,但近年来它们的预期寿命趋势出现了分歧。我们通过比较特定病因的死亡率趋势来研究这种分歧。

方法

我们通过立陶宛统计局、立陶宛卫生研究所和国家健康发展研究所(爱沙尼亚)获得了 2001 年至 2019 年(19 年的数据)20 岁及以上人群的年度死亡率数据。使用 ICD-10 代码,我们分析了全因死亡率并创建了八个主要疾病类别:缺血性心脏病、脑血管疾病、所有其他心血管疾病、癌症(肿瘤)、消化系统疾病、自我伤害和人际暴力、意外伤害和相关情况以及其他死亡(每 10 万人中的死亡人数)。我们使用 joinpoint 回归分析,并分析了每个类别对全因死亡率的比例贡献。

结果

与立陶宛相比,爱沙尼亚的全因死亡率下降更为陡峭(平均年变化百分比,AAPC=-2.55%,95%CI:[-2.91%,-2.20%],P<.001)。在缺血性心脏病死亡率方面,爱沙尼亚在 19 年期间的下降幅度相对较大(AAPC=-6.61%,95%CI:[-7.02%,-6.21%],P<.001)与立陶宛相比(AAPC=-2.23%,95%CI:[-3.40%,-1.04%],P<.001)。

结论

爱沙尼亚和立陶宛表现出明显不同的死亡率趋势和主要疾病类别的分布。我们的发现强调了缺血性心脏病死亡率的作用。公共卫生保健、缺血性心脏病管理和预防、酒精控制政策的差异可能解释了这些差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d673/9618211/e317f73a0728/12889_2022_14354_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验