Suppr超能文献

2020年伊朗卡拉季卡马利医院就诊患者中阴道和口服益生菌对预防早产的作用。

Vaginal and oral probiotics effect in the prevention of preterm delivery in patients visiting Kamali Hospital, Karaj, Iran in 2020.

作者信息

Solgi Elahe, Tavakoli-Far Bahareh, Badehnoosh Bita, Khavandegar Armin, Bakhtiyari Mahmood

机构信息

Obstetrics and Gynecology Resident, School of Medicine, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.

Dietary Supplements and Probiotic Research Center, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2022 Oct 14;16:100169. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2022.100169. eCollection 2022 Dec.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The prevalence of preterm labor (PTL) is growing, and annually one in ten babies is born prematurely. Various studies have examined the effect of oral or vaginal probiotics on the prevention of preterm labor, which has yielded contrasting results. This study aimed to compare the impact of vaginal and oral probiotics on the prevention of preterm delivery.

METHODS

This clinical trial was performed among 185 pregnant women with a gestational age greater than or equal to 25 weeks visiting Kamali Hospital, Karaj, Iran in 2020. The participants were divided into three groups; intervention group 1 receiving Oral probiotic pill once a day until 37 weeks of pregnancy, intervention group 2 receiving probiotic vaginal suppository once a day until 37 weeks of pregnancy, and control group not receiving any intervention. Patients were then followed up until the end of pregnancy.

RESULTS

Demographic characteristics and gestational age at the time of intervention were not significantly different among the three groups. Overall, 26.7 % in the control group, 30 % in intervention group 1 %, and 22.5 % in intervention group 2 had deliveries less than 37 weeks. There was no significant difference in the frequency of preterm labor and the duration of pregnancy among the groups (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Probiotics use does not increase the rate of preterm delivery or reduce the duration of pregnancy, but the rate of preterm delivery was lower in the oral probiotic group. Further clinical studies on the impact of probiotics on PTL can yield valuable results.

摘要

引言

早产(PTL)的发生率正在上升,每年有十分之一的婴儿早产。各种研究探讨了口服或阴道使用益生菌对预防早产的作用,结果不一。本研究旨在比较阴道和口服益生菌对预防早产的影响。

方法

2020年,在伊朗卡拉季的卡马利医院,对185名孕周大于或等于25周的孕妇进行了这项临床试验。参与者被分为三组;干预组1每天口服一次益生菌丸直至妊娠37周,干预组2每天使用一次益生菌阴道栓剂直至妊娠37周,对照组不接受任何干预。然后对患者进行随访直至妊娠结束。

结果

三组在干预时的人口统计学特征和孕周无显著差异。总体而言,对照组中有26.7%、干预组1中有30%、干预组2中有22.5%的孕妇在37周前分娩。各组间早产频率和妊娠持续时间无显著差异(所有p>0.05)。

结论

使用益生菌不会增加早产率或缩短妊娠期,但口服益生菌组的早产率较低。关于益生菌对早产影响的进一步临床研究可能会产生有价值的结果。

相似文献

1
Vaginal and oral probiotics effect in the prevention of preterm delivery in patients visiting Kamali Hospital, Karaj, Iran in 2020.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2022 Oct 14;16:100169. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2022.100169. eCollection 2022 Dec.
2
Maternal probiotic supplementation for prevention of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 12;12(12):CD012519. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012519.pub2.
3
Vaginal probiotics as an adjunct to antibiotic prophylaxis in the management of preterm premature rupture of the membranes.
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Jul;42(5):1037-1042. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2021.1993803. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
5
Effect of probiotics on perinatal outcome in patients at high risk of preterm birth.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2018 Feb;44(2):241-247. doi: 10.1111/jog.13497. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
9
[The use of progestatives for the prevention of spontaneous preterm birth].
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2016 Dec;45(10):1280-1298. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2016.09.012. Epub 2016 Oct 22.
10
Probiotics for preventing preterm labour.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24;2007(1):CD005941. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005941.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Does probiotics work for bacterial vaginosis and vulvovaginal candidiasis.
Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2021 Dec;61:83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2021.09.004. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
2
Bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy: prevalence and outcomes in a tertiary care hospital.
Afr J Reprod Health. 2021 Feb;25(1):49-55. doi: 10.29063/ajrh2021/v25i1.6.
4
Non-antibiotic treatment of bacterial vaginosis-a systematic review.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Jan;303(1):37-45. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05821-x. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
5
Mechanistic insights into the action of probiotics against bacterial vaginosis and its mediated preterm birth: An overview.
Microb Pathog. 2020 Apr;141:104029. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104029. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
6
Prebiotics in the Infant Microbiome: The Past, Present, and Future.
Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2020 Jan;23(1):1-14. doi: 10.5223/pghn.2020.23.1.1. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
7
Association of induced abortion with preterm birth risk in first-time mothers.
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 29;8(1):5353. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23695-7.
8
Effect of maternal age on the risk of preterm birth: A large cohort study.
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 31;13(1):e0191002. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191002. eCollection 2018.
9
Pregnancy outcomes in women taking probiotics or prebiotics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jan 8;18(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1629-5.
10
Epidemiology of preterm birth.
Semin Perinatol. 2017 Nov;41(7):387-391. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2017.07.009. Epub 2017 Sep 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验