Department of Health and Exercise Science, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC (P.H.B.).
Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (B.J.N., D.K.H., W.M.L., D.W.K.), Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
Circ Heart Fail. 2023 Feb;16(2):e010161. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.122.010161. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
We have shown that combined caloric restriction (CR) and aerobic exercise training (AT) improve peak exercise O consumption (VO), and quality-of-life in older patients with obese heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. However, ≈35% of weight lost during CR+AT was skeletal muscle mass. We examined whether addition of resistance training (RT) to CR+AT would reduce skeletal muscle loss and further improve outcomes.
This study is a randomized, controlled, single-blind, 20-week trial of RT+CR+AT versus CR+AT in 88 patients with chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and body mass index (BMI) ≥28 kg/m. Outcomes at 20 weeks included the primary outcome (VO); MRI and dual X-ray absorptiometry; leg muscle strength and quality (leg strength ÷ leg skeletal muscle area); and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire.
Seventy-seven participants completed the trial. RT+CR+AT and CR+AT produced nonsignificant differences in weight loss: mean (95% CI): -8 (-9, -7) versus -9 (-11, -8; =0.21). RT+CR+AT and CR+AT had non-significantly differences in the reduction of body fat [-6.5 (-7.2, -5.8) versus -7.4 (-8.1, -6.7) kg] and skeletal muscle [-2.1 (-2.7, -1.5) versus -2.1 (-2.7, -1.4) kg] (=0.20 and 0.23, respectively). RT+CR+AT produced significantly greater increases in leg muscle strength [4.9 (0.7, 9.0) versus -1.1 (-5.5, 3.2) Nm, =0.05] and leg muscle quality [0.07 (0.03, 0.11) versus 0.02 (-0.02, 0.06) Nm/cm, =0.04]. Both RT+CR+AT and CR+AT produced significant improvements in VO [108 (958, 157) versus 80 (30, 130) mL/min; =0.001 and 0.002, respectively], and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score [17 (12, 22) versus 23 (17, 28); =0.001 for both], with no significant between-group differences. Both RT+CR+AT and CR+AT significantly reduced LV mass and arterial stiffness. There were no study-related serious adverse events.
In older obese heart failure with preserved ejection fraction patients, CR+AT produces large improvements in VO and quality-of-life. Adding RT to CR+AT increased leg strength and muscle quality without attenuating skeletal muscle loss or further increasing VO or quality-of-life.
URL: https://ClincalTrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02636439.
我们已经证明,联合热量限制(CR)和有氧运动训练(AT)可以提高峰值运动耗氧量(VO),并改善射血分数保留的肥胖心力衰竭老年患者的生活质量。然而,在 CR+AT 期间减轻的体重中约有 35%是骨骼肌质量。我们研究了在 CR+AT 中加入阻力训练(RT)是否会减少骨骼肌损失并进一步改善结果。
这是一项随机、对照、单盲、20 周的 RT+CR+AT 与 CR+AT 治疗射血分数保留的慢性心力衰竭和 BMI≥28kg/m2 的肥胖患者的试验。20 周时的主要结局包括(VO);MRI 和双能 X 线吸收法;腿部肌肉力量和质量(腿部力量÷腿部骨骼肌面积);堪萨斯城心肌病问卷。
77 名参与者完成了试验。RT+CR+AT 和 CR+AT 在体重减轻方面没有显著差异:平均(95%CI):-8(-9,-7)与-9(-11,-8;=0.21)。RT+CR+AT 和 CR+AT 在体脂减少[-6.5(-7.2,-5.8)与-7.4(-8.1,-6.7)kg]和骨骼肌减少[-2.1(-2.7,-1.5)与-2.1(-2.7,-1.4)kg]方面没有显著差异(=0.20 和 0.23)。RT+CR+AT 显著增加腿部肌肉力量[4.9(0.7,9.0)与-1.1(-5.5,3.2)Nm,=0.05]和腿部肌肉质量[0.07(0.03,0.11)与 0.02(-0.02,0.06)Nm/cm,=0.04]。RT+CR+AT 和 CR+AT 均显著提高 VO[108(958,157)与 80(30,130)mL/min;=0.001 和 0.002]和堪萨斯城心肌病问卷评分[17(12,22)与 23(17,28);两者均=0.001],但组间无显著差异。RT+CR+AT 和 CR+AT 均显著降低左心室质量和动脉僵硬度。没有与研究相关的严重不良事件。
在射血分数保留的肥胖心力衰竭老年患者中,CR+AT 可显著提高 VO 和生活质量。在 CR+AT 中加入 RT 可增加腿部力量和肌肉质量,而不会减少骨骼肌损失或进一步提高 VO 或生活质量。