Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, North Carolina.
J Paul Sticht Center for Healthy Aging and Alzheimer's Prevention, North Carolina.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2019 Feb 15;74(3):412-419. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gly047.
Previous studies support beneficial effects of both resistance exercise training (RT) and caloric restriction (CR) on skeletal muscle strength and physical performance. The goal of this study was to determine the effects of adding CR to RT on single-muscle fiber contractility responses to RT in older overweight and obese adults.
We analyzed contractile properties in 1,253 single myofiber from muscle biopsies of the vastus lateralis, as well as physical performance and thigh muscle volume, in 31 older (65-80 years), overweight or obese (body mass index = 27-35 kg/m2) men (n = 19) and women (n = 12) who were randomly assigned to a standardized, progressive RT intervention with CR (RT+CR; n = 15) or without CR (RT; n = 16) for 5 months.
Both interventions evoked an increase in force normalized to cross-sectional area (CSA), in type-I and type-II fibers and knee extensor quality. However, these improvements were not different between intervention groups. In the RT group, changes in total thigh fat volume inversely correlated with changes in type-II fiber force (r = -.691; p = .019). Within the RT+CR group, changes in gait speed correlated positively with changes in type-I fiber CSA (r = .561; p = .030). In addition, increases in type-I normalized fiber force were related to decreases in thigh intermuscular fat volume (r = -0.539; p = .038).
Single muscle fiber force and knee extensor quality improve with RT and RT+CR; however, CR does not enhance improvements in single muscle fiber contractility or whole muscle in response to RT in older overweight and obese men and women.
先前的研究支持阻力训练(RT)和热量限制(CR)对骨骼肌力量和身体表现都有有益的影响。本研究的目的是确定在老年超重和肥胖成年人中,将 CR 添加到 RT 中对 RT 单肌纤维收缩性反应的影响。
我们分析了来自股外侧肌肌肉活检的 1253 根单肌纤维的收缩特性,以及 31 名年龄在 65-80 岁之间、超重或肥胖(体重指数=27-35kg/m2)的男性(n=19)和女性(n=12)的身体表现和大腿肌肉量,这些人被随机分配到标准化、渐进的 RT 干预与 CR(RT+CR;n=15)或无 CR(RT;n=16)的 5 个月干预中。
两种干预措施均引起了力与横截面积(CSA)的比值、I 型和 II 型纤维以及膝关节伸肌质量的增加。然而,这些改善在干预组之间没有差异。在 RT 组中,总大腿脂肪量的变化与 II 型纤维力的变化呈负相关(r=-.691;p=0.019)。在 RT+CR 组中,步态速度的变化与 I 型纤维 CSA 的变化呈正相关(r=0.561;p=0.030)。此外,I 型纤维力的增加与大腿肌间脂肪量的减少有关(r=-0.539;p=0.038)。
RT 和 RT+CR 可提高单肌纤维力和膝关节伸肌质量;然而,CR 并不能增强老年超重和肥胖男性和女性对 RT 单肌纤维收缩性或整体肌肉的改善。