Suppr超能文献

从德尔菲研究走向前进:通过共同制作的定性研究开发身体活动培训方案原型。

Moving on From the Delphi Study: The Development of a Physical Activity Training Programme Prototype Through Co-produced Qualitative Research.

机构信息

Department of Sport and Exercise Sciences, 3057Durham University, Durham, UK.

Departamento de Educación Física y Deportiva, Universitat de València, València, Spain.

出版信息

Qual Health Res. 2022 Nov;32(13):1952-1964. doi: 10.1177/10497323221126535. Epub 2022 Sep 14.

Abstract

This research developed from a co-produced project called Moving Social Work. The purpose of this ongoing project is to train social workers in how to promote physical activity for and to disabled people. The first stage of the project consisted of building evidence to design a training programme prototype. As part of this stage, a Delphi study was conducted to ask leading experts about what should be included in the prototype. Questionnaires were sent to participants until consensus was reached. In reflecting on the results, people involved in the study commented that there was more about the experts' opinions than percentages of agreement. Our co-production partners resolved that the Delphi was insufficient and called for detailed conversations with the experts. In response to this call, follow-up interviews with 10 experts who participated in the final questionnaire round of the Delphi were carried out. The interviews were co-produced, dyadic and data prompted. Dialogical inquiry was used to frame and co-analyse data. The results illuminate the capacity of qualitative research to justify, rectify, complicate, clarify, concretize, expand and question consensus-based evidence. The implications of the results for Moving Social Work are discussed. Beyond the empirical border of the project, wider contributions to literature are presented. As part of these, two key statements are highlighted and warranted: dialogical inquiry supports the practice of co-produced research, and Delphi studies should be followed by a Big Q qualitative study.

摘要

本研究源自一个名为“推动社会工作”的合作项目。该项目的目的是培训社会工作者如何为残疾人士促进身体活动。该项目的第一阶段包括构建证据,以设计培训计划原型。作为该阶段的一部分,进行了一项 Delphi 研究,以询问主要专家应在原型中包含哪些内容。问卷发送给参与者,直到达成共识。在反思研究结果时,参与研究的人员指出,专家意见的内容多于达成一致的百分比。我们的合作生产伙伴认为 Delphi 不够充分,并呼吁与专家进行详细对话。作为对此呼吁的回应,对参与 Delphi 最终问卷轮次的 10 名专家进行了后续访谈。访谈是合作进行的,是二元的,并受数据提示。对话式探究被用来构建和共同分析数据。研究结果阐明了定性研究有能力证明、纠正、复杂化、澄清、具体化、扩展和质疑基于共识的证据。讨论了这些结果对“推动社会工作”的影响。除了项目的经验边界之外,还提出了更广泛的文献贡献。作为其中的一部分,强调并保证了两个关键声明:对话式探究支持合作研究的实践,并且 Delphi 研究应该紧随其后进行一个大 Q 定性研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19e9/9629513/9c41f8b8310f/10.1177_10497323221126535-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验