• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

帕金森病患者责任共识反馈语句:德尔菲研究。

Consensus on Feedback Statements That Create Responsibility Among People With Parkinson's Disease: A Delphi Study.

机构信息

Mahsa Meimandi, MSc, is PhD Candidate, Rehabilitation Research Center, Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Akram Azad, PhD, is Associate Professor, Rehabilitation Research Center, Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Am J Occup Ther. 2023 Jul 1;77(4). doi: 10.5014/ajot.2023.050231.

DOI:10.5014/ajot.2023.050231
PMID:37585597
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Sense of agency is associated with a sense of responsibility, which is essential to performing goal-directed occupations.

OBJECTIVE

To reach consensus on a set of extrinsic feedback statements that have the potential to create a sense of responsibility among patients with neurological disorders in the course of performing daily or social occupations.

DESIGN

Anonymous Delphi study with two rounds with international experts and one round with Irani patients with Parkinson's disease (PD).

SETTING

Electronic survey.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred experts and 73 patients with idiopathic PD.

OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Experts and patients anonymously rated (5 = strongly agree/very effective, 4 = agree/effective, 3 = neither agree nor disagree/uncertain, 2 = disagree/ineffective, 1 = strongly disagree/very ineffective) their level of agreement with each survey statement and the effectiveness of each statement in creating a sense of responsibility in the course of performing daily or social occupations. Consensus was set as an interquartile range of ≤1 and ≥70% agreement in two adjacent categories of a Likert scale.

RESULTS

In the experts' first round, consensus was reached on the level of agreement and effectiveness of 18 statements. In the second round, final consensus was achieved on all statements. In the one patient round, patients reached consensus on all statements. Finally, 34 statements were rated as 4 or 5 in terms of agreement and effectiveness, based on the opinions of experts and patients.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study has produced a collection of feedback statements that might be useful in occupation-based interventions. What This Article Adds: Extrinsic responsibility feedback delivered while administering occupation-based interventions may increase volition, motivation, and engagement.

摘要

重要性

主体感与责任感相关,而责任感对于执行目标导向的职业至关重要。

目的

就一整套外在反馈陈述达成共识,这些陈述有可能在患者执行日常或社交职业的过程中产生责任感。

设计

匿名德尔菲研究,包括两轮国际专家和一轮伊朗帕金森病患者参与。

设置

电子调查。

参与者

100 名专家和 73 名特发性帕金森病患者。

结果和措施

专家和患者匿名对每个调查陈述的同意程度和在执行日常或社交职业过程中产生责任感的有效性进行评分(5=强烈同意/非常有效,4=同意/有效,3=既不同意也不反对/不确定,2=不同意/无效,1=强烈反对/非常无效)。共识设定为李克特量表相邻两个类别之间的四分位距≤1 和≥70%的同意。

结果

在专家第一轮中,就 18 个陈述的同意程度和有效性达成了共识。在第二轮中,所有陈述最终达成共识。在患者一轮中,患者对所有陈述达成了共识。最终,根据专家和患者的意见,34 个陈述在同意程度和有效性方面被评为 4 或 5。

结论和相关性

本研究产生了一系列反馈陈述,这些陈述可能对基于职业的干预措施有用。这篇文章增加了什么:在实施基于职业的干预措施时提供外在责任反馈可能会增加意志、动力和参与度。

相似文献

1
Consensus on Feedback Statements That Create Responsibility Among People With Parkinson's Disease: A Delphi Study.帕金森病患者责任共识反馈语句:德尔菲研究。
Am J Occup Ther. 2023 Jul 1;77(4). doi: 10.5014/ajot.2023.050231.
2
Occupations to Enhance Responsibility Among Patients With Parkinson's Disease: An International Delphi Study.提高帕金森病患者责任感的职业:一项国际德尔菲研究。
Am J Occup Ther. 2023 Jul 1;77(4). doi: 10.5014/ajot.2023.050128.
3
A Delphi Panel of People With Parkinson's Disease Regarding Responsibility: Toward a Preliminary Taxonomy.德尔福小组对帕金森病患者的责任调查:建立初步分类法。
Am J Occup Ther. 2024 May 1;78(3). doi: 10.5014/ajot.2024.050463.
4
Evidence-Based Aquatic Therapy Guidelines for Parkinson's Disease: An International Consensus Study.帕金森病基于证据的水疗指南:一项国际共识研究。
J Parkinsons Dis. 2022;12(2):621-637. doi: 10.3233/JPD-212881.
5
Insight from an Italian Delphi Consensus on EVAR feasibility outside the instruction for use: the SAFE EVAR Study.意大利关于在使用说明之外进行腔内修复术(EVAR)可行性的德尔菲共识见解:SAFE EVAR研究
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2024 Jun;65(3):273-279. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.23.12906-5. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
6
Medication appropriateness tool for co-morbid health conditions in dementia: consensus recommendations from a multidisciplinary expert panel.痴呆症共病健康状况的药物适宜性工具:多学科专家小组的共识建议
Intern Med J. 2016 Oct;46(10):1189-1197. doi: 10.1111/imj.13215.
7
A Delphi consensus study among patients and clinicians in the Netherlands on the procedure of informing young breast cancer patients about Fertility Preservation.荷兰的患者和临床医生间开展的关于向年轻乳腺癌患者告知生育力保存程序的德尔菲共识研究。
Acta Oncol. 2012 Nov;51(8):1062-9. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2012.702927.
8
A T2 Translational Science Modified Delphi Study: Spinal Motion Restriction in a Resource-Scarce Environment.一项T2转化科学改良德尔菲研究:资源匮乏环境下的脊柱活动限制
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2020 Oct;35(5):538-545. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X20000862. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
9
An international Delphi study examining health promotion and health education in nursing practice, education and policy.一项审视护理实践、教育及政策中的健康促进与健康教育的国际德尔菲研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Apr;17(7):891-900. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02079.x.
10
Patients with low prognosis in ART: a Delphi consensus to identify potential clinical implications and measure the impact of POSEIDON criteria.ART 预后不良患者:德尔菲共识以确定潜在的临床意义并衡量 POSEIDON 标准的影响。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024 Oct 10;22(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12958-024-01291-x.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparison of the effects of occupation-based interventions with and without responsibility feedback and conventional interventions on participation in people with idiopathic Parkinson's disease: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.基于作业的干预措施与有/无责任反馈的常规干预措施对特发性帕金森病患者参与度影响的比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2023 Sep 26;24(1):610. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07526-3.