State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430072, China.
CCCC Hemei Eco-environmental Construction Co., Ltd, Wuhan, Hubei, 430050, China.
Environ Manage. 2023 Apr;71(4):867-884. doi: 10.1007/s00267-022-01742-4. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
Changes in land-use patterns may increase the ecological risks faced by Eco-Fragile regions. It is vital for regional ecological restoration and management of Eco-Fragile regions to reasonably assess ecological risk and study its response to typical land-use patterns. Existing study on regional ecological risk largely ignored the internal representation of ecosystem health and ecosystem services to ecological risk, and also ignored the internal relationship between ecological risk and land use patterns. This study developed a regional ecological assessment model by describing the relationship between ecosystem health, ecosystem services and ecological risks. Among them, the ecosystem health assessment used the Net Primary Productivity, landscape index and ecosystem elasticity coefficient based on different land use patterns to build Vigor-Organization-Resilience (VOR) model, and the improved equivalent factor method was used to calculate the ecosystem service value. Taking the Fen River Basin (FRB), a typical Eco-Fragile region of the Loess Plateau, as a study region, spatial auto-correlation analysis was used to reveal the temporal and spatial changes and spatial clustering characteristics of regional ecological risk, and regression analysis was used to study the relationship between typical land use patterns and ecological risks, which was included in the consideration of ecological and environmental risk management strategies. The results show that the regions with high ecological risk are mainly distributed in the middle and southwest of the FRB; the regions with low ecological risk are mainly distributed in the north, east and west of the FRB. Both high-risk and low-risk areas show significant spatial clustering effects. The change of ecological risk in FRB is related to the land use patterns. The ecological risk is negatively related to the expansion of construction land and cultivated land at the county and patch scales. On this basis, the environmental management strategies at different scales are discussed. This study can helpful deepen the understanding of the impact of land use patterns on ecological risk, and can also provide important reference for regional ecological risk management and land use policies.
土地利用方式的变化可能会增加生态脆弱地区面临的生态风险。合理评估生态风险并研究其对典型土地利用方式的响应,对于区域生态恢复和生态脆弱地区的管理至关重要。现有区域生态风险研究在很大程度上忽略了生态系统健康和生态系统服务对生态风险的内部表现,也忽略了生态风险与土地利用方式之间的内在关系。本研究通过描述生态系统健康、生态系统服务与生态风险之间的关系,构建了区域生态评估模型。其中,生态系统健康评估采用基于不同土地利用方式的净初级生产力、景观指数和生态弹性系数构建 Vigor-Organization-Resilience(VOR)模型,采用改进的当量因子法计算生态系统服务价值。以黄土高原典型生态脆弱区汾河流域(FRB)为研究区,采用空间自相关分析揭示区域生态风险的时空变化和空间集聚特征,采用回归分析研究典型土地利用方式与生态风险的关系,纳入生态和环境风险管理策略。结果表明,高生态风险区主要分布在 FRB 的中部和西南部;低生态风险区主要分布在 FRB 的北部、东部和西部。高风险区和低风险区均表现出显著的空间集聚效应。FRB 生态风险的变化与土地利用方式有关。在县域和斑块尺度上,生态风险与建设用地和耕地的扩张呈负相关。在此基础上,讨论了不同尺度的环境管理策略。本研究有助于深化对土地利用方式对生态风险影响的认识,为区域生态风险管理和土地利用政策提供重要参考。