Suppr超能文献

小切口(≤2.5厘米)入路与传统开放外侧入路治疗桡骨头骨折的比较研究

Comparative Study Between the Mini-Open (≤2.5 Cm) Approach and Conventional Open Lateral Approach in the Surgical Treatment of Radial Head Fractures.

作者信息

Zhou Xiaofeng, Wang Bingzhi, Liu Yu, Wang Zicheng, Zhao Xuehui, Liu Fanxiao, Lu Shun, Xu Weicheng, Li Lianxin, Dong Jinlei

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, People's Republic of China.

Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Pain Res. 2022 Oct 26;15:3413-3422. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S374599. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The conventional lateral approach is widely used to treat radial head fractures with screws. However, the traditional incision may have shortcomings, including excessive exposure and significant scarring. We propose an innovative method - a mini-open lateral approach of less than 2.5 cm for surgical treatment of radial head fractures with screws.

METHODS

From Jan 2017 to Dec 2020, 34 patients diagnosed with closed radial head fracture were treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in this study. The novel group (mini-open group) included 15 patients, and the other 19 patients were in the traditional group. The time of operation and the blood loss during operation were recorded. Postoperative clinical outcomes and radiographic results were recorded and compared between the two groups. The range of motion (ROM) in the elbow, the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Rating Scale of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and the Shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (Q-DASH) score and complications, such as wound infection, vascular and nerve damage, and fragment redisplacement were observed in the two groups.

RESULTS

In the comparison between the two groups, there was no significant difference in age, sex, cause of radial head fracture, or other basic information. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and VAS score at 3 days postoperation were significantly reduced in the novel group ( < 0.05). The follow-up results showed that there was no significant difference in MEPS, ASES, or Q-DASH scores between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The mini-open approach reduced intraoperative blood loss, shortened operation time, relieved patient pain, and achieved a satisfactory postoperative clinical result, which demonstrates that the novel approach is a safe and effective option for treating radial head fractures.

摘要

目的

传统外侧入路广泛用于螺钉固定治疗桡骨头骨折。然而,传统切口可能存在缺点,包括暴露过多和明显瘢痕形成。我们提出一种创新方法——一种小于2.5 cm的微型开放外侧入路,用于螺钉固定手术治疗桡骨头骨折。

方法

2017年1月至2020年12月,本研究中34例诊断为闭合性桡骨头骨折的患者接受切开复位内固定术(ORIF)治疗。新型组(微型开放组)包括15例患者,另外19例患者在传统组。记录手术时间和术中出血量。记录并比较两组术后临床结果和影像学结果。观察两组肘关节活动范围(ROM)、视觉模拟评分(VAS)、梅奥肘关节功能评分(MEPS)、美国肩肘外科医师学会评分(ASES)、手臂、肩部和手部简化功能障碍问卷(Q-DASH)评分以及并发症,如伤口感染、血管和神经损伤以及骨折块再移位。

结果

两组比较,年龄、性别、桡骨头骨折原因或其他基本信息无显著差异。新型组手术时间、术中出血量和术后3天VAS评分显著降低(<0.05)。随访结果显示,两组MEPS、ASES或Q-DASH评分无显著差异。

结论

微型开放入路减少术中出血量,缩短手术时间,减轻患者疼痛,术后临床结果满意,表明该新型入路是治疗桡骨头骨折的一种安全有效的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ece8/9618242/8eb206652ddc/JPR-15-3413-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验