Biodegradable magnesium vs. polylactide pins for radial head fracture stabilization: a biomechanical study.

BACKGROUND

Biodegradable implants have gained increasing importance for the fixation of simple displaced radial head fractures to supersede implant removal and to minimize cartilage destruction. Commonly used polylactide pins still lead to higher rates of secondary loss of reduction compared with metal implants. Alternatively, implants made from a magnesium alloy meanwhile are available in a pin design that hypothetically could perform better than polylactide pins. Because biomechanical data of clinical applications are lacking, the goal of the present study was to biomechanically compare magnesium pins to polylactide pins using a Mason type II radial head fracture model.

METHODS

Fourteen pairs of fresh-frozen human cadaver radii with a standardized Mason type II radial head fracture were stabilized either by two 2.0-mm polylactide pins (PPs) or two 2.0-mm magnesium pins (MPs). Biomechanical in vitro testing was conducted as 10 cycles of static loading at 0.1 Hz axially and transversally between 10 and 50 N. Afterward, loosening was tested by dynamic load changes at 4 Hz up to 100,000 cycles. Early fracture displacement was measured after 10,000 cycles. Afterward, maximum loads were raised every 10,000 cycles by 15 N until construct failure, which was defined as fracture displacement ≥2 mm.

RESULTS

MP osteosynthesis showed a tendency toward higher primary stability on both axial (MP: 0.19 kN/mm, PP: 0.11 kN/mm; P = .068) and transversal loading (MP: 0.11 kN/mm, PP: 0.10 kN/mm; P = .068). Early fracture displacement was significantly higher following PP osteosynthesis (MP: 0.3 mm, PP: 0.7 mm; P = .030). The superiority of MP was also significant during cyclic loading, represented in a higher failure cycle (MP: 30,684, PP: 5113; P = .009) and in higher failure loads (MP: 95 N, PP: 50 N; P = .024).

CONCLUSION

According to our findings, in simple radial head fractures, osteosynthesis with magnesium pins show superior biomechanical properties compared with fractures treated by polylactide pins. Prospective investigations should follow to evaluate clinical outcomes and resorption behavior.