• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

灾难准备的协作规划原则。

Collaborative planning principles for disaster preparedness.

作者信息

Shmueli Deborah F, Ozawa Connie P, Kaufman Sanda

机构信息

Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.

Nohad A. Toulan School of Urban Studies and Planning, Portland State University, Portland, OR, USA.

出版信息

Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2021 Jan;52:101981. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101981. Epub 2020 Nov 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101981
PMID:36320361
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9614352/
Abstract

Natural and technological hazards can have consequences of a scale and severity far exceeding most human experience. Massive earthquakes predicted as imminent for some regions of the world, fires engulfing large tracts of land and the global COVID-19 pandemic of 2020 illustrate several key preparedness challenges. The hazards literature stresses the importance of involving communities in decisions before, during and after calamitous events occur. Currently, community planning and hazard risk management planning are largely carried out in separate tracks that seldom intersect. We propose that hazard risk managers may benefit from integrating in their approaches collaborative planning principles, especially at the pre-disaster stage. We further propose that community planners deliberately consider hazards and integrate the potential consequences of a disaster into routine plan-making, boosting communities' resilience. Finally, since citizen involvement is necessary but burdensome in both planning and hazards management, we suggest a set of criteria for considering who-from among the many community and public stakeholders-should be involved, when, and how.

摘要

自然和技术灾害可能造成规模和严重程度远超大多数人类经验的后果。世界上一些地区预计即将发生的大地震、吞噬大片土地的火灾以及2020年的全球新冠疫情,都说明了几个关键的备灾挑战。灾害相关文献强调了让社区参与灾害发生前、期间和之后决策的重要性。目前,社区规划和灾害风险管理规划在很大程度上是在很少交叉的不同轨道上进行的。我们建议灾害风险管理者可能会从将协作规划原则纳入其方法中受益,尤其是在灾害前阶段。我们进一步建议社区规划者有意识地考虑灾害因素,并将灾害的潜在后果纳入日常规划制定中,增强社区的复原力。最后,由于公民参与在规划和灾害管理中都是必要的,但也很繁重,我们提出了一套标准,以考虑众多社区和公共利益相关者中哪些人应该参与、何时参与以及如何参与。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4c0/9614352/83f18d6f4f1d/fx1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4c0/9614352/83f18d6f4f1d/fx1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4c0/9614352/83f18d6f4f1d/fx1_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Collaborative planning principles for disaster preparedness.灾难准备的协作规划原则。
Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2021 Jan;52:101981. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101981. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
2
Emergency Response and Management应急响应与管理
3
Rural Community Disaster Preparedness and Risk Perception in Trujillo, Peru.秘鲁特鲁希略农村社区的灾难防备与风险认知
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017 Aug;32(4):387-392. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X17006380. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
4
Enhancing community preparedness: an inventory and analysis of disaster citizen science activities.增强社区备灾能力:灾害公民科学活动的清单和分析。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Oct 23;19(1):1356. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7689-x.
5
A disaster by any other name?: COVID-19 and support for an All-Hazards approach.换个名字的灾难?:新冠疫情与对全灾种应对方法的支持
Risk Hazards Crisis Public Policy. 2021 Sep;12(3):240-265. doi: 10.1002/rhc3.12213. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
6
Principles and practice of disaster relief: lessons from Haiti.救灾的原则与实践:来自海地的经验教训。
Mt Sinai J Med. 2011 May-Jun;78(3):306-18. doi: 10.1002/msj.20251.
7
Community Disaster Resilience in the COVID-19 Outbreak: Insights from Shanghai's Experience in China.新冠疫情下的社区灾害韧性:来自中国上海经验的洞察
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Jan 5;13:3259-3270. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S283447. eCollection 2020.
8
Community's Emergency Preparedness for Flood Hazards in Dire-dawa Town, Ethiopia: A Qualitative Study.埃塞俄比亚德雷达瓦镇社区对洪水灾害的应急准备:一项定性研究。
PLoS Curr. 2018 Feb 21;10:ecurrents.dis.3843ad9fc823c8c853970148b350750c. doi: 10.1371/currents.dis.3843ad9fc823c8c853970148b350750c.
9
Breaking Through Barriers and Building Disaster Mental Resilience: A Case Study in the Aftermath of the 2015 Nepal Earthquakes.突破障碍,建立灾难心理韧性:尼泊尔 2015 年地震后的案例研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 17;16(16):2964. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16162964.
10
Challenges of the New Zealand healthcare disaster preparedness prior to the Canterbury earthquakes: a qualitative analysis.坎特伯雷地震前新西兰医疗保健灾难准备工作面临的挑战:一项定性分析。
N Z Med J. 2013 Mar 15;126(1371):9-18.

引用本文的文献

1
Rainfall-runoff modeling of urban floods using GIS and HEC-HMS.利用地理信息系统(GIS)和水文工程中心-水文模拟系统(HEC-HMS)对城市洪水进行降雨径流模拟。
MethodsX. 2025 Jun 13;15:103437. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2025.103437. eCollection 2025 Dec.
2
A reflection on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Australian businesses: Toward a taxonomy of vulnerabilities.关于新冠疫情对澳大利亚企业影响的思考:构建脆弱性分类法
Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2021 Oct;64:102496. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102496. Epub 2021 Jul 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Community resilience and urban planning in tsunami-prone settlements in Chile.智利海啸多发地区的社区韧性与城市规划。
Disasters. 2020 Jan;44(1):103-124. doi: 10.1111/disa.12369. Epub 2019 Oct 6.
2
The dual discourse of urban resilience: robust city and self-organised neighbourhoods.城市韧性的双重话语:强健的城市和自组织的社区。
Disasters. 2020 Jan;44(1):125-151. doi: 10.1111/disa.12367. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
3
Evaluating participatory decision processes: which methods inform reflective practice?评估参与式决策过程:哪些方法有助于反思性实践?
Eval Program Plann. 2014 Feb;42:11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2013.08.002. Epub 2013 Aug 30.