Suppr超能文献

阿维鲁单抗用于晚期尿路上皮癌一线化疗后的维持治疗——一项成本效益分析

Avelumab Maintenance Treatment After First-line Chemotherapy in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma-A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

作者信息

Lin Dong, Luo Shaohong, Lin Shen, Zhong Lixian, Zhou Wei, Gu Dian, Huang Xiaoting, Chen Qixin, Xu Xiongwei, Weng Xiuhua

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Taijiang, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China.

College of Pharmacy, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.

出版信息

Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2023 Feb;21(1):8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.10.001. Epub 2022 Oct 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recently, a clinical trial (NCT02603432) showed that avelumab maintenance treatment, post first-line chemotherapy, can significantly prolong the overall survival of patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC), however, the treatment was very expensive. This study aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of avelumab maintenance therapy in advanced or metastatic UC from the US taxpayer perspective.

METHODS

Based on the data of the JAVELIN Bladder 100 clinical trial (NCT02603432), a Markov multi-state model was constructed to investigate the costs and clinical outcomes of avelumab maintenance after platinum-based chemotherapy versus best supportive care (BSC) for advanced or metastatic UC. Parameters of the model came from the 2020 Average Sales Price Drug Pricing Files and published literature. The main outputs were costs, life years (LYs), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Robustness was tested by deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. The analysis was stratified to include both the overall population and a subset of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive patients.

RESULTS

Avelumab maintenance therapy was estimated to generate an additional 0.26 QALYs (1.46 vs. 1.20 QALYs) and costs $183,271 ($278,323 vs. $95,052) more compared to BSC alone in the overall population, yielding an ICER of $699,065/QALY. For the PD-L1-positive population, avelumab produced a 0.42 increase in QALYs (1.74 vs. 1.32 QALYs) and raised costs to $223,238 ($320,355 vs. $97,117), resulting in an ICER of $521,850/QALY for this population. Both ICERs were above the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $200,000/QALY. Sensitivity analyses manifested that the model was robust.

CONCLUSION

From the perspective of the US taxpayer, avelumab maintenance therapy is considered cost-ineffective for patients with advanced or metastatic UC at a WTP threshold of $200,000/QALY in the overall population as well as in PD-L1-positive population.

摘要

背景

最近,一项临床试验(NCT02603432)表明,阿维鲁单抗在一线化疗后进行维持治疗,可显著延长晚期尿路上皮癌(UC)患者的总生存期,然而,该治疗费用非常昂贵。本研究旨在从美国纳税人的角度确定阿维鲁单抗维持治疗在晚期或转移性UC中的成本效益。

方法

基于JAVELIN Bladder 100临床试验(NCT02603432)的数据,构建马尔可夫多状态模型,以研究铂类化疗后阿维鲁单抗维持治疗与晚期或转移性UC的最佳支持治疗(BSC)相比的成本和临床结果。模型参数来自2020年药品平均销售价格定价文件和已发表的文献。主要产出包括成本、生命年(LYs)、质量调整生命年(QALYs)和增量成本效益比(ICER)。通过确定性和概率敏感性分析测试稳健性。分析进行了分层,包括总体人群和程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)阳性患者亚组。

结果

在总体人群中,与单独使用BSC相比,阿维鲁单抗维持治疗估计可额外产生0.26个QALY(分别为1.46个和1.20个QALY),成本增加183,271美元(分别为278,323美元和95,052美元),ICER为699,065美元/QALY。对于PD-L1阳性人群,阿维鲁单抗使QALY增加0.42(分别为1.74个和

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验