• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿维鲁单抗维持治疗联合最佳支持治疗对比单纯最佳支持治疗用于晚期或转移性尿路上皮癌的成本效果分析。

Cost-Effectiveness of Avelumab Maintenance Therapy Plus Best Supportive Care vs. Best Supportive Care Alone for Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.

机构信息

West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

West China School of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 27;10:837854. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.837854. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2022.837854
PMID:35570929
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9093135/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Avelumab (MSB0010718C) is a fully human anti-programmed cell death ligand 1(PD-L1) antibody against PD-L1 interactions and enhances immune activation against tumor cells in the meantime. Avelumab has been approved for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) after disease progression in several countries. We therefore conducted this study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of avelumab maintenance therapy for advanced or mUC from the perspective of the United States (US) and China payer.

METHODS

A Markov simulation model was performed based on clinical trial JAVELIN Bladder 100. Utilities and costs adopted in this analysis were derived from published literature and clinical trials. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated to compare the avelumab maintenance therapy group (AVE group) and the best supportive care group (CON group).

RESULTS

The ICER of the AVE group compared with the CON group were $38,369.50 and $16,150.29 per QALYs in the overall population and in the PD-L1-positive population, respectively. While the ICER of AVE group compared with CON group were $241,610.25 and $100,528.29 per QALYs in the overall population and in the PD-L1-positive population, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Avelumab maintenance therapy was a cost-effective first-line treatment compared with BSC in patients with mUC which were not progressed with platinum-based chemotherapy not only in the PD-L1-positive population but also in the overall population based on the current willingness to pay (WTP) of $150,000 in the US. It was not cost-effective both in the overall population and in the PD-L1 positive population at the WTP threshold of $30,447.09 in China.

摘要

目的

avelumab(MSB0010718C)是一种针对 PD-L1 相互作用的完全人源抗程序性细胞死亡配体 1(PD-L1)抗体,同时增强了针对肿瘤细胞的免疫激活。avelumab 已在几个国家获得批准,用于疾病进展后的局部晚期或转移性尿路上皮癌(mUC)。因此,我们进行了这项研究,从美国(US)和中国支付者的角度评估 avelumab 维持治疗晚期或 mUC 的成本效益。

方法

基于 JAVELIN Bladder 100 临床试验,进行了 Markov 模拟模型。本分析中采用的效用和成本来自已发表的文献和临床试验。计算增量成本效益比(ICER),以比较 avelumab 维持治疗组(AVE 组)和最佳支持治疗组(CON 组)。

结果

AVE 组与 CON 组的 ICER 分别为总体人群和 PD-L1 阳性人群每 QALY 的 38369.50 美元和 16150.29 美元。AVE 组与 CON 组的 ICER 分别为总体人群和 PD-L1 阳性人群每 QALY 的 241610.25 美元和 100528.29 美元。

结论

对于未接受含铂化疗进展的 mUC 患者,avelumab 维持治疗与 BSC 相比,不仅在 PD-L1 阳性人群中,而且在总体人群中,均具有成本效益,基于当前美国 150000 美元的意愿支付(WTP)阈值。在 WTP 阈值为 30447.09 美元时,在中国的总体人群和 PD-L1 阳性人群中均不具有成本效益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad41/9093135/1a5d41ae5d73/fpubh-10-837854-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad41/9093135/4ce3cb7e4892/fpubh-10-837854-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad41/9093135/2892e0f4233e/fpubh-10-837854-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad41/9093135/7e7c197c3cda/fpubh-10-837854-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad41/9093135/1a5d41ae5d73/fpubh-10-837854-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad41/9093135/4ce3cb7e4892/fpubh-10-837854-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad41/9093135/2892e0f4233e/fpubh-10-837854-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad41/9093135/7e7c197c3cda/fpubh-10-837854-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad41/9093135/1a5d41ae5d73/fpubh-10-837854-g0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness of Avelumab Maintenance Therapy Plus Best Supportive Care vs. Best Supportive Care Alone for Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.阿维鲁单抗维持治疗联合最佳支持治疗对比单纯最佳支持治疗用于晚期或转移性尿路上皮癌的成本效果分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 27;10:837854. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.837854. eCollection 2022.
2
Cost-Effectiveness of Avelumab Maintenance Therapy for Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma in the United States.阿维鲁单抗维持治疗用于美国晚期或转移性尿路上皮癌的成本效果分析。
Adv Ther. 2021 Dec;38(12):5710-5720. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01950-0. Epub 2021 Oct 24.
3
Avelumab Maintenance Treatment After First-line Chemotherapy in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma-A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.阿维鲁单抗用于晚期尿路上皮癌一线化疗后的维持治疗——一项成本效益分析
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2023 Feb;21(1):8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.10.001. Epub 2022 Oct 8.
4
Cost-effectiveness of avelumab first-line maintenance therapy for adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma in France.法国局部晚期或转移性尿路上皮癌成人患者一线维持治疗avelumab 的成本效益分析。
PLoS One. 2024 May 10;19(5):e0302548. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302548. eCollection 2024.
5
Avelumab first-line maintenance plus best supportive care (BSC) vs. BSC alone for advanced urothelial carcinoma: JAVELIN Bladder 100 Asian subgroup analysis.avelumab 一线维持治疗联合最佳支持治疗(BSC)对比单纯 BSC 治疗晚期尿路上皮癌:JAVELIN Bladder 100 亚洲亚组分析。
Urol Oncol. 2023 May;41(5):256.e17-256.e25. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.02.002. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
6
Patient-reported Outcomes from JAVELIN Bladder 100: Avelumab First-line Maintenance Plus Best Supportive Care Versus Best Supportive Care Alone for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma.JAVELIN Bladder 100研究中的患者报告结局:阿维鲁单抗一线维持治疗加最佳支持治疗与单纯最佳支持治疗用于晚期尿路上皮癌的比较
Eur Urol. 2023 Apr;83(4):320-328. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.04.016. Epub 2022 May 30.
7
A cost-effectiveness analysis of avelumab plus best supportive care versus best supportive care alone as first-line maintenance treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma in Taiwan.台湾地区局部晚期或转移性尿路上皮癌患者一线维持治疗中avelumab 联合最佳支持治疗对比最佳支持治疗单独应用的成本效果分析。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2023 Oct;6(10):e1887. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1887. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
8
Avelumab Maintenance Therapy for Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.阿维鲁单抗维持治疗晚期或转移性尿路上皮癌。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Sep 24;383(13):1218-1230. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002788. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
9
Cost-effectiveness analysis for avelumab first-line maintenance treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma in Scotland.苏格兰晚期尿路上皮癌avelumab 一线维持治疗的成本效果分析。
Future Oncol. 2024 Mar;20(8):459-470. doi: 10.2217/fon-2023-0372. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
10
The JAVELIN Bladder Medley trial: avelumab-based combinations as first-line maintenance in advanced urothelial carcinoma.JAVELIN Bladder Medley 试验:avelumab 为基础的联合方案作为晚期尿路上皮癌的一线维持治疗。
Future Oncol. 2024 Feb;20(4):179-190. doi: 10.2217/fon-2023-0492. Epub 2023 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of perioperative durvalumab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer in the United States.围手术期度伐利尤单抗联合新辅助化疗在美国肌肉浸润性膀胱癌治疗中的成本效益
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2025 Jul 29;17:17588359251357519. doi: 10.1177/17588359251357519. eCollection 2025.
2
A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Avelumab as a First-Line Maintenance Treatment of Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma in the Netherlands.阿维鲁单抗作为荷兰晚期尿路上皮癌一线维持治疗的成本效益分析。
Oncol Ther. 2025 May 17. doi: 10.1007/s40487-025-00345-3.
3
Enhancing Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibition for Bladder Cancer: A Comparative Analysis of Injectable vs. Intravesical Administration.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of enfortumab vedotin in previously treated advanced urothelial carcinoma.恩杂鲁胺在既往治疗的晚期尿路上皮癌中的成本效益
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2022 Jan 22;14:17588359211068733. doi: 10.1177/17588359211068733. eCollection 2022.
2
Cost-Effectiveness of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Urothelial Carcinoma-A Review.免疫检查点抑制剂在尿路上皮癌中的成本效益——综述
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Dec 24;14(1):73. doi: 10.3390/cancers14010073.
3
Cost-Effectiveness of Avelumab Maintenance Therapy for Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma in the United States.
提高膀胱癌免疫检查点抑制治疗的疗效和安全性:注射与膀胱内给药的比较分析。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 May 1;25(9):4945. doi: 10.3390/ijms25094945.
4
Cost-effectiveness of avelumab first-line maintenance therapy for adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma in France.法国局部晚期或转移性尿路上皮癌成人患者一线维持治疗avelumab 的成本效益分析。
PLoS One. 2024 May 10;19(5):e0302548. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302548. eCollection 2024.
5
Cost-Effectiveness and Economic Impact of Bladder Cancer Management: An Updated Review of the Literature.膀胱癌管理的成本效益和经济影响:文献的最新回顾。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2023 Jul;41(7):751-769. doi: 10.1007/s40273-023-01273-8. Epub 2023 Apr 23.
阿维鲁单抗维持治疗用于美国晚期或转移性尿路上皮癌的成本效果分析。
Adv Ther. 2021 Dec;38(12):5710-5720. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01950-0. Epub 2021 Oct 24.
4
Avelumab as second-line therapy for metastatic, platinum-treated urothelial carcinoma in the phase Ib JAVELIN Solid Tumor study: 2-year updated efficacy and safety analysis.avelumab 作为二线治疗转移性、铂类治疗后的尿路上皮癌的疗效和安全性分析:来自 JAVELIN Solid Tumor 研究的 2 年更新数据。
J Immunother Cancer. 2020 Oct;8(2). doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-001246.
5
Avelumab Maintenance Therapy for Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.阿维鲁单抗维持治疗晚期或转移性尿路上皮癌。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Sep 24;383(13):1218-1230. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002788. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
6
Cost-effectiveness of Pembrolizumab versus Carboplatin-based Chemotherapy as First-line Treatment of PD-L1-positive Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Ineligible for Cisplatin-based Therapy in the United States.帕博利珠单抗与以卡铂为基础的化疗作为美国无法接受以顺铂为基础治疗的PD-L1阳性局部晚期或转移性尿路上皮癌一线治疗的成本效益
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2021 Feb;19(1):e17-e30. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.07.006. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
7
NICE's rejection of pembrolizumab for platinum-refractory urothelial carcinoma: is there a greater good?NICE 拒绝使用 pembrolizumab 治疗铂类耐药性尿路上皮癌:是否有更大的好处?
Nat Rev Urol. 2020 Sep;17(9):491-492. doi: 10.1038/s41585-020-0357-1.
8
An evaluation of avelumab for the treatment of genitourinary tumors.评估avelumab 治疗泌尿生殖系统肿瘤。
Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2020 Sep;20(9):971-979. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2020.1769596. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
9
European Association of Urology Guidelines on Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer: Summary of the 2020 Guidelines.欧洲泌尿外科学会肌层浸润性和转移性膀胱癌指南:2020 年指南摘要。
Eur Urol. 2021 Jan;79(1):82-104. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.03.055. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
10
Cancer statistics, 2020.癌症统计数据,2020 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590. Epub 2020 Jan 8.