Health Economics Department, Merck Santé S.A.S., Lyon, France.
Health Economics department, Pfizer S.A.S., Paris, France.
PLoS One. 2024 May 10;19(5):e0302548. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302548. eCollection 2024.
This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of avelumab first-line (1L) maintenance therapy plus best supportive care (BSC) versus BSC alone for adults with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) that had not progressed following platinum-based chemotherapy in France.
A three-state partitioned survival model was developed to assess the lifetime costs and effects of avelumab plus BSC versus BSC alone. Data from the phase 3 JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial (NCT02603432) were used to inform estimates of clinical and utility values considering a 10-year time horizon and a weekly cycle length. Cost data were estimated from a collective perspective and included treatment acquisition, administration, follow-up, adverse event-related hospitalization, transport, post-progression, and end-of-life costs. Health outcomes were measured in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and life-years gained. Costs and clinical outcomes were discounted at 2.5% per annum. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were used to compare cost-effectiveness and willingness to pay in France. Uncertainty was assessed using a range of sensitivity analyses.
Avelumab plus BSC was associated with a gain of 2.49 QALYs and total discounted costs of €136,917; BSC alone was associated with 1.82 QALYs and €39,751. Although avelumab plus BSC was associated with increased acquisition costs compared with BSC alone, offsets of -€20,424 and -€351 were observed for post-progression and end-of-life costs, respectively. The base case analysis ICER was €145,626/QALY. Sensitivity analyses were consistent with the reference case and showed that efficacy parameters (overall survival, time to treatment discontinuation), post-progression time on immunotherapy, and post-progression costs had the largest impact on the ICER.
This analysis demonstrated that avelumab plus BSC is associated with a favorable cost-effectiveness profile for patients with la/mUC who are eligible for 1L maintenance therapy in France.
本研究评估了avelumab 一线(1L)维持治疗联合最佳支持治疗(BSC)对比 BSC 单药治疗在法国局部晚期或转移性尿路上皮癌(la/mUC)患者中的成本效益,这些患者在铂类化疗后未进展。
采用三状态分区生存模型评估avelumab 联合 BSC 对比 BSC 单药治疗的终生成本和效果。采用 III 期 JAVELIN Bladder 100 试验(NCT02603432)的数据来评估考虑 10 年时间范围和每周周期长度的临床和效用值。从总体角度估计成本数据,包括治疗获得、管理、随访、与不良事件相关的住院、交通、进展后和生命终末期成本。健康结果以质量调整生命年(QALY)和生命年数表示。成本和临床结果按每年 2.5%贴现。增量成本效益比(ICER)用于比较法国的成本效益和支付意愿。采用一系列敏感性分析评估不确定性。
avelumab 联合 BSC 治疗可获得 2.49 个 QALY 和 136917 欧元的总折扣成本;BSC 单药治疗可获得 1.82 个 QALY 和 39751 欧元。与 BSC 单药治疗相比,avelumab 联合 BSC 治疗的获得成本增加,但观察到进展后和生命终末期成本分别为-20424 欧元和-351 欧元的抵消。基本情况分析的 ICER 为 145626 欧元/QALY。敏感性分析与参考情况一致,表明疗效参数(总生存、治疗停止时间)、免疫治疗后进展时间和进展后成本对 ICER 的影响最大。
本分析表明,对于有资格接受 1L 维持治疗的法国局部晚期或转移性尿路上皮癌患者,avelumab 联合 BSC 具有良好的成本效益。