Center for Child and Family Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America; Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America; Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America; Durham VA Healthcare System, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Child Abuse Negl. 2022 Dec;134:105938. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105938. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
Child maltreatment leads to substantial adverse health outcomes, but little is known about acute health care utilization patterns after children are evaluated for a concern of maltreatment at a child abuse and neglect medical evaluation clinic.
To quantify the association of having a child maltreatment evaluation with subsequent acute health care utilization among children from birth to age three.
Children who received a maltreatment evaluation (N = 367) at a child abuse and neglect subspecialty clinic in an academic health system in the United States and the general pediatric population (N = 21,231).
We conducted a retrospective cohort study that compared acute health care utilization over 18 months between the two samples using data from electronic health records. Outcomes were time to first emergency department (ED) visit or inpatient hospitalization, maltreatment-related ED use or inpatient hospitalization, and ED use or inpatient hospitalization for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs). Multilevel survival analyses were performed.
Children who received a maltreatment evaluation had an increased hazard for a subsequent ED visit or inpatient hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.3, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.1, 1.5) and a maltreatment-related visit (HR: 4.4, 95 % CI: 2.3, 8.2) relative to the general pediatric population. A maltreatment evaluation was not associated with a higher hazard of health care use for ACSCs (HR: 1.0, 95 % CI: 0.7, 1.3).
This work can inform targeted anticipatory guidance to aid high-risk families in preventing future harm or minimizing complications from previous maltreatment.
儿童虐待会导致严重的健康不良后果,但对于在儿童虐待和忽视医疗评估诊所评估虐待问题后儿童的急性医疗保健利用模式知之甚少。
量化儿童虐待评估与儿童从出生到三岁期间后续急性医疗保健利用之间的关联。
在美国一个学术医疗系统中的儿童虐待和忽视专科诊所接受虐待评估(N=367)的儿童和一般儿科人群(N=21,231)。
我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,使用电子健康记录中的数据比较了这两个样本在 18 个月内的急性医疗保健利用情况。结果是首次急诊就诊或住院的时间、与虐待相关的急诊就诊或住院以及因门诊护理敏感条件(ACSCs)就诊或住院。进行了多层次生存分析。
与一般儿科人群相比,接受虐待评估的儿童随后发生急诊就诊或住院的风险增加(危险比 [HR]:1.3,95%置信区间 [CI]:1.1,1.5)和与虐待相关的就诊(HR:4.4,95% CI:2.3,8.2)。虐待评估与 ACSC 的医疗保健利用风险增加无关(HR:1.0,95% CI:0.7,1.3)。
这项工作可以为有针对性的预期指导提供信息,以帮助高风险家庭预防未来的伤害或最大限度地减少以前虐待的并发症。