Suppr超能文献

使用自行车模拟器评估三种交叉路口处理方式对骑自行车者安全的影响。

Assessing the impact of three intersection treatments on bicyclist safety using a bicycling simulator.

作者信息

Scott-Deeter Logan, Hurwitz David, Russo Brendan, Smaglik Edward, Kothuri Sirisha

机构信息

School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State University, 1491 SW Campus Way, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.

School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State University, 1491 SW Campus Way, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Jan;179:106877. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106877. Epub 2022 Oct 29.

Abstract

Bicyclist safety at urban intersections is a critical element for encouraging an increase in bicycle commuting. With cyclist injury and fatality rates rising due to collisions with vehicles at signalized intersections, increasing the safety of riders continues to be an important consideration when promoting this mode of transportation. Previous research has addressed crash causality and helped to develop several roadway treatments to improve bicyclist safety, but little has been done to compare and contrast the benefits of the various treatment types. This bicycling simulator study examined the impacts of three different intersection treatments (i.e., bike box, mixing zone, and bicycle signals) to better understand their influence on bicyclists' comfort, levels of stress, and riding behaviors. This improved understanding allowed researchers to make recommendations for which of the three designs proved to be most effective for reducing the risk of vehicle-bicycle collisions at signalized intersections. Forty participants successfully completed the study by responding to twenty-four scenarios while riding in the Oregon State University Bicycling Simulator. Time-space measurements revealed that the mixing zone treatment correlated with the most unpredictable riding behaviors. Analysis of the participants' eye-movements revealed a lower rate of recognizing the conflict vehicle when traversing the bicycle signal treatments. Galvanic Skin Response measurements were used to measure participants stress levels but found no statistically significant results, although it was found that the mixing zone elicited slightly larger stress responses. Researchers found the bike box design to be the most versatile, providing a balance of increased safety while also requiring the participant to perceive potential danger and be ready to respond accordingly. The results of this research can provide a better understanding of how to best implement these intersection treatments to increase bicyclists' safety at signalized intersections.

摘要

城市交叉路口的自行车骑行者安全是鼓励自行车通勤增加的关键因素。由于在信号控制的交叉路口与车辆碰撞导致骑自行车者受伤和死亡率上升,在推广这种交通方式时,提高骑行者的安全性仍然是一个重要的考虑因素。先前的研究已经探讨了碰撞因果关系,并有助于开发几种道路处理方法来提高自行车骑行者的安全性,但在比较和对比各种处理类型的益处方面做得很少。这项自行车模拟研究考察了三种不同交叉路口处理方式(即自行车专用箱、混合区和自行车信号灯)的影响,以更好地了解它们对自行车骑行者的舒适度、压力水平和骑行行为的影响。这种更深入的理解使研究人员能够就三种设计中哪一种被证明对降低信号控制交叉路口车辆与自行车碰撞风险最有效提出建议。40名参与者在俄勒冈州立大学自行车模拟器中骑行时,通过对24种场景做出反应,成功完成了这项研究。时空测量结果显示,混合区处理方式与最不可预测的骑行行为相关。对参与者眼动的分析表明,在通过自行车信号灯处理区域时,识别冲突车辆的比率较低。使用皮肤电反应测量来测量参与者的压力水平,但未发现具有统计学意义的结果,不过发现混合区引发的压力反应略大。研究人员发现自行车专用箱设计最为通用,既能提高安全性,又要求参与者意识到潜在危险并做好相应反应的准备。这项研究的结果可以更好地理解如何最好地实施这些交叉路口处理方式,以提高信号控制交叉路口自行车骑行者的安全性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验