Masoud Ghodrat Abadi, Graduate Research Assistant, School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State University, 1491 SW Campus Way, 101 Kearney Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.
Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, 3760 E. Stevens Way NE, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Apr;125:29-39. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.01.024. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
There is little research on the behavioral interaction between bicycle lanes and commercial vehicle loading zones (CVLZ) in the United States. These interactions are important to understand, to preempt increasing conflicts between truckers and bicyclists. In this study, a bicycling simulator experiment examined bicycle and truck interactions. The experiment was successfully completed by 48 participants. The bicycling simulator collected data regarding a participant's velocity and lateral position. Three independent variables reflecting common engineering approaches were included in this experiment: pavement marking (L1: white lane markings with no supplemental pavement color, termed white lane markings, L2: white lane markings with solid green pavement applied on the conflict area, termed solid green, and L3: white lane markings with dashed green pavement applied on the conflict area, termed dashed green), signage (L1: No sign and L2: a truck warning sign), and truck maneuver (L1: no truck in CVLZ, L2: truck parked in CVLZ, and L3: truck pulling out of CVLZ). The results showed that truck presence does have an effect on bicyclist's performance, and this effect varies based on the engineering and design treatments employed. Of the three independent variables, truck maneuvering had the greatest impact by decreasing mean bicyclist velocity and increasing mean lateral position. It was also observed that when a truck was present in a CVLZ, bicyclists had a lower velocity and lower divergence from right-edge of bike lane on solid green pavement, and a higher divergence from the right-edge of bike lane was observed when a warning sign was present.
在美国,针对自行车道与货车停靠区(CVLZ)之间的行为交互作用的研究甚少。这些交互作用很重要,需要加以理解,以预先防止卡车司机和骑自行车者之间的冲突加剧。在这项研究中,使用自行车模拟器实验检验了自行车和卡车之间的交互作用。该实验由 48 名参与者成功完成。自行车模拟器收集了有关参与者速度和横向位置的数据。该实验包含了三个反映常见工程方法的独立变量:路面标记(L1:无补充路面颜色的白色车道标记,称为白色车道标记;L2:在冲突区域应用实心绿色路面的白色车道标记,称为实心绿色;L3:在冲突区域应用虚线绿色路面的白色车道标记,称为虚线绿色)、标志(L1:无标志;L2:卡车警告标志)和卡车操作(L1:CVLZ 中无卡车;L2:卡车停在 CVLZ 中;L3:卡车从 CVLZ 中驶出)。结果表明,卡车的存在确实会影响自行车手的表现,而这种影响因所采用的工程和设计处理方法而异。在这三个独立变量中,卡车的操作对自行车手的速度影响最大,降低了平均自行车速度并增加了平均横向位置。还观察到,当卡车停在 CVLZ 中时,自行车手的速度会降低,并且在实心绿色路面上与自行车道右侧边缘的偏离程度也会降低,而当有警告标志时,自行车道右侧边缘的偏离程度会更高。