• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

神经预后评估

Neuroprognostication.

作者信息

Fleming Victoria, Muehlschlegel Susanne

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, 55 Lake Avenue North, S-5, Worcester, MA 01655, USA.

Department of Neurology, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, 55 Lake Avenue North, S-5, Worcester, MA 01655, USA; Department of Anesthesiology/Critical Care, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, 55 Lake Avenue North, S-5, Worcester, MA 01655, USA; Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, 55 Lake Avenue North, S-5, Worcester, MA 01655, USA.

出版信息

Crit Care Clin. 2023 Jan;39(1):139-152. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2022.06.005. Epub 2022 Oct 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.ccc.2022.06.005
PMID:36333028
Abstract

Patients with severe acute brain injury are left incapacitated, critically ill, and unable to make their own medical decisions. Surrogate decision-makers must make life-or-death decisions for patients and rely on clinicians' prognostication for guidance. No guidelines currently exist to guide clinicians in how to prognosticate; hence, neuroprognostication is still considered an "art" leaving room for high variability. This review examines the current literature on prognostication in neurocritical care, identifies ongoing challenges that exist in the field, and provides suggestions for future research with the goal to ameliorate variability and focus on scientific and patient-centered, rather than artistic approaches to prognostication.

摘要

患有严重急性脑损伤的患者会丧失行为能力,病情危急,无法自行做出医疗决策。替代决策者必须为患者做出生死抉择,并依靠临床医生的预后判断提供指导。目前尚无指导临床医生进行预后判断的指南;因此,神经预后判断仍被视为一门“艺术”,存在很大的变异性。本综述审视了神经重症监护中有关预后判断的当前文献,确定了该领域存在的持续挑战,并为未来研究提供建议,目标是减少变异性,专注于以科学和患者为中心而非凭经验的预后判断方法。

相似文献

1
Neuroprognostication.神经预后评估
Crit Care Clin. 2023 Jan;39(1):139-152. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2022.06.005. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
2
Prognostication in Neurocritical Care.神经危重症预后预测。
Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2024 Jun 1;30(3):878-903. doi: 10.1212/CON.0000000000001433.
3
What Families Need and Physicians Deliver: Contrasting Communication Preferences Between Surrogate Decision-Makers and Physicians During Outcome Prognostication in Critically Ill TBI Patients.家属的需求和医生的提供:在重症脑损伤患者预后判断中,代理决策者和医生之间沟通偏好的对比。
Neurocrit Care. 2017 Oct;27(2):154-162. doi: 10.1007/s12028-017-0427-2.
4
Prognostication and shared decision making in neurocritical care.神经危重症的预后预测和决策共享。
BMJ. 2022 Apr 7;377:e060154. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-060154.
5
Guidelines for Neuroprognostication in Critically Ill Adults with Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.《成人中重度创伤性脑损伤神经预后指南》。
Neurocrit Care. 2024 Apr;40(2):448-476. doi: 10.1007/s12028-023-01902-2. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
6
"It's not just what the doctor tells me:" factors that influence surrogate decision-makers' perceptions of prognosis.“不仅仅是医生告诉我的:”影响代理人决策人对预后看法的因素。
Crit Care Med. 2010 May;38(5):1270-5. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181d8a217.
7
Variability of Prognostic Communication in Critically Ill Neurologic Patients: A Pilot Multicenter Mixed-Methods Study.重症神经科患者预后沟通的可变性:一项多中心混合方法试点研究
Crit Care Explor. 2022 Feb 21;4(2):e0640. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000640. eCollection 2022 Feb.
8
Ethical Considerations in Neuroprognostication Following Acute Brain Injury.急性脑损伤后神经预后的伦理考虑。
Semin Neurol. 2023 Oct;43(5):758-767. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1775597. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
9
Clinician-Family Communication About Patients' Values and Preferences in Intensive Care Units.临床医生与患者家属在重症监护病房中就患者价值观和偏好的沟通。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 May 1;179(5):676-684. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0027.
10
Ethical considerations: care of the critically ill and injured during pandemics and disasters: CHEST consensus statement.伦理考虑:大流行和灾害期间危重症和伤员的照护:CHEST 共识声明。
Chest. 2014 Oct;146(4 Suppl):e145S-55S. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-0742.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges with Formulating Accurate Prognosis for Patients with Severe Acute Brain Injury.为重度急性脑损伤患者制定准确预后的挑战。
Neurocrit Care. 2024 Dec 3. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-02170-4.
2
Shared Decision-Making for Patients with Stroke in Neurocritical Care: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis.神经重症监护中中风患者的共同决策:一项定性元综合分析。
Neurocrit Care. 2025 Apr;42(2):644-667. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-02106-y. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
3
Prevalence and predictors of shared decision-making in goals-of-care clinician-family meetings for critically ill neurologic patients: a multi-center mixed-methods study.
重症神经疾病患者的临床医生-家庭治疗目标会议中共享决策的流行率及其预测因素:一项多中心混合方法研究。
Crit Care. 2023 Oct 21;27(1):403. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04693-2.