• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
"It's not just what the doctor tells me:" factors that influence surrogate decision-makers' perceptions of prognosis.“不仅仅是医生告诉我的:”影响代理人决策人对预后看法的因素。
Crit Care Med. 2010 May;38(5):1270-5. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181d8a217.
2
Prevalence of and Factors Related to Discordance About Prognosis Between Physicians and Surrogate Decision Makers of Critically Ill Patients.重症患者的医生和代理人在预后方面存在分歧的流行率及相关因素。
JAMA. 2016 May 17;315(19):2086-94. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.5351.
3
Doubt and belief in physicians' ability to prognosticate during critical illness: the perspective of surrogate decision makers.对医生在危重病期间进行预后判断能力的怀疑与信任:替代决策者的观点。
Crit Care Med. 2008 Aug;36(8):2341-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318180ddf9.
4
Hope, truth, and preparing for death: perspectives of surrogate decision makers.希望、真相与面对死亡:替代决策者的观点
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Dec 16;149(12):861-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-12-200812160-00005.
5
Quality of communication in the ICU and surrogate's understanding of prognosis.重症监护病房的沟通质量与代理人对预后的理解
Crit Care Med. 2015 Mar;43(3):542-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000719.
6
Surrogate decision makers' interpretation of prognostic information: a mixed-methods study.代理人决策人对预后信息的解读:一项混合方法研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Mar 6;156(5):360-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-5-201203060-00008.
7
Health Care Professionals' Responses to Religious or Spiritual Statements by Surrogate Decision Makers During Goals-of-Care Discussions.医疗保健专业人员对代理人决策者在目标关怀讨论中提出的宗教或精神问题的回应。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Oct;175(10):1662-9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.4124.
8
A randomized trial of two methods to disclose prognosis to surrogate decision makers in intensive care units.一项在重症监护病房中向替代决策人透露预后的两种方法的随机试验。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Oct 1;182(7):905-9. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201002-0262OC. Epub 2010 Jun 10.
9
Surrogate decision makers' responses to physicians' predictions of medical futility.替代决策者对医生关于医疗无效性预测的反应。
Chest. 2009 Jul;136(1):110-117. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-2753. Epub 2009 Mar 24.
10
A Multicenter Study of the Causes and Consequences of Optimistic Expectations About Prognosis by Surrogate Decision-Makers in ICUs.多中心研究:重症监护病房中代理人决策对预后乐观预期的原因和后果。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Sep;47(9):1184-1193. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003807.

引用本文的文献

1
Communicating with Families after Severe Acute Brain Injury.重度急性脑损伤后与家属沟通
Neurocrit Care. 2025 Apr 11. doi: 10.1007/s12028-025-02252-x.
2
Shared Decision-Making for Patients with Stroke in Neurocritical Care: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis.神经重症监护中中风患者的共同决策:一项定性元综合分析。
Neurocrit Care. 2025 Apr;42(2):644-667. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-02106-y. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
3
An Update on Palliative Care in Neurocritical Care: Providing Goal‑Concordant Care in the Face of Prognostic Uncertainty.神经重症监护中的姑息治疗最新进展:面对预后不确定性时提供目标一致的护理。
Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2023 Dec;25(12):517-529. doi: 10.1007/s11940-023-00778-z. Epub 2023 Dec 5.
4
Disambiguating Consciousness in Clinical Settings.在临床环境中明确意识状态
Neurology. 2023 Nov 14;101(20):896-900. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207765. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
5
Early Shared Decision-Making for Older Adults with Traumatic Brain Injury: Using Time-Limited Trials and Understanding Their Limitations.早期共同决策在老年创伤性脑损伤患者中的应用:使用限时试验并了解其局限性。
Neurocrit Care. 2023 Oct;39(2):284-293. doi: 10.1007/s12028-023-01764-8. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
6
Patient-Caregiver Dyads' Prognostic Information Preferences and Perceptions in Advanced Cancer.晚期癌症患者-照护者二联体的预后信息偏好和认知。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 May;65(5):442-455.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.01.012. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
7
Turkish imams and their role in decision-making in palliative care: A Directed Content and Narrative analysis.土耳其伊玛目及其在姑息治疗决策中的作用:定向内容与叙事分析
Palliat Med. 2022 Jun;36(6):1006-1017. doi: 10.1177/02692163221095200.
8
Prognosis Predictions by Families, Physicians, and Nurses of Patients with Severe Acute Brain Injury: Agreement and Accuracy.严重急性脑损伤患者的家属、医生和护士的预后预测:一致性和准确性。
Neurocrit Care. 2022 Aug;37(1):38-46. doi: 10.1007/s12028-022-01501-7. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
9
Variability of Prognostic Communication in Critically Ill Neurologic Patients: A Pilot Multicenter Mixed-Methods Study.重症神经科患者预后沟通的可变性:一项多中心混合方法试点研究
Crit Care Explor. 2022 Feb 21;4(2):e0640. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000640. eCollection 2022 Feb.
10
Prognostication, Ethical Issues, and Palliative Care in Disorders of Consciousness.意识障碍的预后、伦理问题和姑息治疗。
Neurol Clin. 2022 Feb;40(1):59-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2021.08.005.

本文引用的文献

1
Surrogate decision-makers' perspectives on discussing prognosis in the face of uncertainty.替代决策者在面对不确定性时对讨论预后的看法。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009 Jan 1;179(1):48-53. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200806-969OC. Epub 2008 Oct 17.
2
Trauma death: views of the public and trauma professionals on death and dying from injuries.创伤死亡:公众和创伤专业人员对因伤致死及临终情况的看法。
Arch Surg. 2008 Aug;143(8):730-5. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.143.8.730.
3
Prognostication during physician-family discussions about limiting life support in intensive care units.在重症监护病房中医生与家属讨论限制生命支持时的预后判断。
Crit Care Med. 2007 Feb;35(2):442-8. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000254723.28270.14.
4
Communication between physicians and family caregivers about care at the end of life: when do discussions occur and what is said?医生与家庭护理人员之间关于临终护理的沟通:讨论何时进行以及讨论了什么?
J Palliat Med. 2005 Dec;8(6):1176-85. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2005.8.1176.
5
Communication of prognostic information for critically ill patients.危重症患者预后信息的传达
Chest. 2005 Sep;128(3):1728-35. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.3.1728.
6
Dawning of awareness: the experience of surrogate decision making at the end of life.意识的觉醒:临终时替代决策的经历。
J Clin Ethics. 2005 Spring;16(1):28-45.
7
Clinician predictions of intensive care unit mortality.临床医生对重症监护病房死亡率的预测。
Crit Care Med. 2004 May;32(5):1149-54. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000126402.51524.52.
8
Family perspectives on end-of-life care at the last place of care.家属对临终关怀最后场所的看法。
JAMA. 2004 Jan 7;291(1):88-93. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.1.88.
9
Prognosis communication in serious illness: perceptions of older patients, caregivers, and clinicians.重症疾病中的预后沟通:老年患者、照护者及临床医生的看法
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 Oct;51(10):1398-403. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51457.x.
10
Complexities in prognostication in advanced cancer: "to help them live their lives the way they want to".晚期癌症预后的复杂性:“帮助他们按自己想要的方式生活”。
JAMA. 2003 Jul 2;290(1):98-104. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.1.98.

“不仅仅是医生告诉我的:”影响代理人决策人对预后看法的因素。

"It's not just what the doctor tells me:" factors that influence surrogate decision-makers' perceptions of prognosis.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2010 May;38(5):1270-5. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181d8a217.

DOI:10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181d8a217
PMID:20228686
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3530838/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Physicians and surrogate decision-makers for seriously ill patients often have different views of patients' prognoses. We sought to understand what sources of knowledge surrogates rely on when estimating a patient's prognosis.

DESIGN

Prospective, mixed-methods study using face-to-face, semistructured interviews with surrogate decision-makers.

SETTING

Four intensive care units at the University of California, San Francisco Medical Center in 2006 to 2007.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants were 179 surrogate decision-makers for 142 incapacitated, critically ill patients at high risk for death.

MAIN RESULTS

Less than 2% (3 of 179) of surrogates reported that their beliefs about the patients' prognoses hinged exclusively on prognostic information provided to them by physicians. The majority cited other factors in addition to physicians' predictions that also contributed to their beliefs about the patients' prognoses, including perceptions of the patient's individual strength of character and will to live; the patient's unique history of illness and survival; the surrogate's own observations of the patient's physical appearance; the surrogate's belief that their presence at the bedside may improve the prognosis; and the surrogate's optimism, intuition, and faith. For some surrogates, these other sources of knowledge superseded the importance of the physician's prognostication. However, most surrogates endeavored to balance their own knowledge of the patient with physicians' biomedical knowledge.

CONCLUSIONS

Surrogates use diverse types of knowledge when estimating their loved ones' prognoses, including individualized attributes of the patient, such as their strength of character and life history, of which physicians may be unaware. Attention to these considerations may help clinicians identify and overcome disagreements about prognosis.

摘要

目的

医生和重病患者的代理人在患者预后方面往往存在不同看法。我们试图了解代理人在评估患者预后时依赖哪些知识来源。

设计

前瞻性、混合方法研究,对代理决策者进行面对面、半结构化访谈。

地点

2006 年至 2007 年,加利福尼亚大学旧金山医学中心的四个重症监护病房。

参与者

142 名无行为能力、重病、死亡风险高的患者的 179 名代理人。

主要结果

不到 2%(179 名中的 3 名)的代理人表示,他们对患者预后的信念完全取决于医生提供的预后信息。大多数代理人除了医生的预测外,还引用了其他因素,这些因素也影响了他们对患者预后的看法,包括对患者个人性格和生存意愿的看法;患者独特的疾病和生存史;代理人对患者身体状况的观察;代理人认为他们在床边可能会改善预后;以及代理人的乐观、直觉和信仰。对一些代理人来说,这些其他知识来源比医生的预测更重要。然而,大多数代理人都努力平衡自己对患者的了解与医生的生物医学知识。

结论

代理人在评估亲人的预后时会使用多种类型的知识,包括患者的个体化特征,如性格和病史,而医生可能并不了解这些特征。关注这些因素可能有助于临床医生识别和克服对预后的分歧。