• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

群体结构中直接互惠的进化。

Evolution of direct reciprocity in group-structured populations.

机构信息

RIKEN Center for Computational Science, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0047, Japan.

Max Planck Research Group 'Dynamics of Social Behavior', Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plön, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 4;12(1):18645. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23467-4.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-23467-4
PMID:36333592
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9636277/
Abstract

People tend to have their social interactions with members of their own community. Such group-structured interactions can have a profound impact on the behaviors that evolve. Group structure affects the way people cooperate, and how they reciprocate each other's cooperative actions. Past work has shown that population structure and reciprocity can both promote the evolution of cooperation. Yet the impact of these mechanisms has been typically studied in isolation. In this work, we study how the two mechanisms interact. Using a game-theoretic model, we explore how people engage in reciprocal cooperation in group-structured populations, compared to well-mixed populations of equal size. In this model, the population is subdivided into groups. Individuals engage in pairwise interactions within groups while they also have chances to imitate strategies outside the groups. To derive analytical results, we focus on two scenarios. In the first scenario, we assume a complete separation of time scales. Mutations are rare compared to between-group comparisons, which themselves are rare compared to within-group comparisons. In the second scenario, there is a partial separation of time scales, where mutations and between-group comparisons occur at a comparable rate. In both scenarios, we find that the effect of population structure depends on the benefit of cooperation. When this benefit is small, group-structured populations are more cooperative. But when the benefit is large, well-mixed populations result in more cooperation. Overall, our results reveal how group structure can sometimes enhance and sometimes suppress the evolution of cooperation.

摘要

人们往往更倾向于与自己所在社区的成员进行社交互动。这种群体结构的互动会对演化出的行为产生深远的影响。群体结构影响着人们的合作方式,以及他们如何相互回报彼此的合作行为。过去的研究表明,群体结构和互惠性都可以促进合作的演化。然而,这些机制的影响通常是孤立地进行研究的。在这项工作中,我们研究了这两种机制是如何相互作用的。我们使用博弈论模型,研究了在群体结构的人群中,与同等大小的均匀混合人群相比,人们如何进行互惠合作。在这个模型中,人口被细分为群体。个体在群体内部进行成对的相互作用,同时也有机会模仿群体外部的策略。为了得出分析结果,我们关注了两种情况。在第一种情况下,我们假设时间尺度完全分离。与群体间比较相比,突变是罕见的,而群体间比较本身也比群体内比较罕见。在第二种情况下,时间尺度存在部分分离,突变和群体间比较以相当的速度发生。在这两种情况下,我们发现群体结构的影响取决于合作的好处。当这种好处较小时,群体结构的人群会更加合作。但当好处较大时,均匀混合的人群会导致更多的合作。总的来说,我们的结果揭示了群体结构如何有时增强、有时抑制合作的演化。

相似文献

1
Evolution of direct reciprocity in group-structured populations.群体结构中直接互惠的进化。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 4;12(1):18645. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23467-4.
2
Heterogeneous indirect reciprocity promotes the evolution of cooperation in structured populations.异质性间接互惠促进结构化群体中合作行为的进化。
Chaos. 2018 Dec;28(12):123108. doi: 10.1063/1.5066589.
3
Direct reciprocity in spatial populations enhances R-reciprocity as well as ST-reciprocity.空间种群中的直接互惠增强了 R 互惠和 ST 互惠。
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 7;8(8):e71961. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071961. eCollection 2013.
4
Computational evolution of social norms in well-mixed and group-structured populations.混合群体和群体结构人群中社会规范的计算进化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Aug 13;121(33):e2406885121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2406885121. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
5
Evolution of group-wise cooperation: Is direct reciprocity insufficient?群体合作的演变:直接互惠是否足够?
J Theor Biol. 2017 Feb 21;415:20-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2016.12.002. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
6
Direct reciprocity in structured populations.结构种群中的直接互惠。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jun 19;109(25):9929-34. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1206694109. Epub 2012 Jun 4.
7
Reputation effects drive the joint evolution of cooperation and social rewarding.声誉效应对合作与社会奖励的共同进化有驱动作用。
Nat Commun. 2022 Oct 7;13(1):5928. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33551-y.
8
Mutation enhances cooperation in direct reciprocity.突变增强了直接互惠中的合作。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 May 16;120(20):e2221080120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2221080120. Epub 2023 May 8.
9
Stags, Hawks, and Doves: Social Evolution Theory and Individual Variation in Cooperation.雄鹿、鹰派与鸽派:社会进化理论与合作中的个体差异
Integr Comp Biol. 2017 Sep 1;57(3):566-579. doi: 10.1093/icb/icx071.
10
Evolutionary dynamics of general group interactions in structured populations.结构化种群中一般群体相互作用的进化动力学
Phys Rev E. 2016 Feb;93(2):022407. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.93.022407. Epub 2016 Feb 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Computational evolution of social norms in well-mixed and group-structured populations.混合群体和群体结构人群中社会规范的计算进化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Aug 13;121(33):e2406885121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2406885121. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
2
Evolution of reciprocity with limited payoff memory.回报有限记忆下的互惠行为演变。
Proc Biol Sci. 2024 Jun;291(2025):20232493. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.2493. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
3
When do stereotypes undermine indirect reciprocity?刻板印象何时会破坏间接互惠?

本文引用的文献

1
Memory-two zero-determinant strategies in repeated games.重复博弈中的记忆二零行列式策略。
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 May 26;8(5):202186. doi: 10.1098/rsos.202186.
2
Friendly-rivalry solution to the iterated n-person public-goods game.迭代多人公共物品博弈的友好竞争解决方案。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Jan 21;17(1):e1008217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008217. eCollection 2021 Jan.
3
Five rules for friendly rivalry in direct reciprocity.直接互惠中的五条友好竞争规则。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Mar 1;20(3):e1011862. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011862. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
A geometric process of evolutionary game dynamics.进化博弈动力学的几何过程。
J R Soc Interface. 2023 Nov;20(208):20230460. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2023.0460. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
5
Adaptive dynamics of memory-one strategies in the repeated donation game.记忆策略在重复捐赠游戏中的适应动态。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 Jun 29;19(6):e1010987. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010987. eCollection 2023 Jun.
6
Grouping promotes both partnership and rivalry with long memory in direct reciprocity.分组促进了直接互惠中的伙伴关系和竞争,同时具有长记忆。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 Jun 20;19(6):e1011228. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011228. eCollection 2023 Jun.
7
Evolution of norms for judging social behavior.评判社会行为规范的演变。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jun 13;120(24):e2219480120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2219480120. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 9;10(1):16904. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73855-x.
4
Automata representation of successful strategies for social dilemmas.社会困境中成功策略的自动机表示。
Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 7;10(1):13370. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70281-x.
5
Partners and rivals in direct reciprocity.直接互惠的伙伴和对手。
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Jul;2(7):469-477. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0320-9. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
6
Computation and Simulation of Evolutionary Game Dynamics in Finite Populations.有限群体中进化博弈动力学的计算与模拟。
Sci Rep. 2019 May 6;9(1):6946. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43102-z.
7
Seven rules to avoid the tragedy of the commons.避免公地悲剧的七条法则。
J Theor Biol. 2018 Jul 14;449:94-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2018.04.027. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
8
Zero-determinant strategies in finitely repeated games.有限重复博弈中的零行列式策略。
J Theor Biol. 2018 Feb 7;438:61-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
9
Extortion provides alternative routes to the evolution of cooperation in structured populations.敲诈为结构种群中合作的进化提供了替代途径。
Phys Rev E. 2017 May;95(5-1):052302. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.95.052302. Epub 2017 May 1.
10
Memory- strategies of direct reciprocity.直接互惠的记忆策略。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 May 2;114(18):4715-4720. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1621239114. Epub 2017 Apr 18.