National Center for Chronic and Non-Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Popul Health Metr. 2022 Nov 4;20(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12963-022-00297-0.
Chronic pain is a common disease; about 20% of people worldwide suffer from it. While compared with the research on the prevalence and management of chronic pain in developed countries, there is a relative lack of research in this field in China. This research aims to construct the China Pain Health Index (CPHI) to evaluate the current status of the prevalence and management of chronic pain in the Chinese population.
The dimensions and indicators of CPHI were determined through literature review, Delphi method, and analytical hierarchy process model, and the original values of relevant indicators were obtained by collecting multi-source data. National and sub-provincial scores of CPHI (2020) were calculated by co-directional transformation, standardization, percentage transformation of the aggregate, and weighted summation.
The highest CPHI score in 2020 is Beijing, and the lowest is Tibet. The top five provinces are Beijing (67.64 points), Shanghai (67.04 points), Zhejiang (65.74 points), Shandong (61.16 points), and Tianjin (59.99 points). The last five provinces are Tibet (33.10 points), Ningxia (37.24 points), Guizhou (39.85 points), Xinjiang (39.92 points), and Hainan (40.38 points). The prevalence of chronic pain is severe in Heilongjiang, Chongqing, Guizhou, Sichuan, and Fujian. Guizhou, Hainan, Xinjiang, Beijing, and Guangdong display a high burden of chronic pain. The five provinces of Guangdong, Shanghai, Beijing, Jiangsu, and Zhejiang have better treatment for chronic pain, while Tibet, Qinghai, Jilin, Ningxia, and Xinjiang have a lower quality of treatment. Beijing, Shanghai, Qinghai, Guangxi, and Hunan have relatively good development of chronic pain disciplines, while Tibet, Sichuan, Inner Mongolia, Hebei, and Guizhou are relatively poor.
The economically developed provinces in China have higher CPHI scores, while economically underdeveloped areas have lower scores. The current pain diagnosis and treatment situation in economically developed regions is relatively good, while that in financially underdeveloped areas is rather poor. According to the variations in the prevalence and management of chronic pain among populations in different provinces in China, it is necessary to implement chronic pain intervention measures adapted to local conditions.
慢性疼痛是一种常见疾病;全球约有 20%的人患有此病。尽管与发达国家慢性疼痛的流行情况和管理研究相比,中国在该领域的研究相对较少。本研究旨在构建中国疼痛健康指数(CPHI),以评估中国人群慢性疼痛的流行情况和管理现状。
通过文献回顾、德尔菲法和层次分析法模型确定 CPHI 的维度和指标,并通过多源数据收集获得相关指标的原始值。采用同方向转换、标准化、总和聚合的百分比转换和加权求和法计算 CPHI(2020 年)的全国和省级得分。
2020 年 CPHI 得分最高的是北京,最低的是西藏。排名前五的省份是北京(67.64 分)、上海(67.04 分)、浙江(65.74 分)、山东(61.16 分)和天津(59.99 分)。排名后五的省份是西藏(33.10 分)、宁夏(37.24 分)、贵州(39.85 分)、新疆(39.92 分)和海南(40.38 分)。黑龙江、重庆、贵州、四川和福建慢性疼痛的流行情况严重。贵州、海南、新疆、北京和广东的慢性疼痛负担较重。广东、上海、北京、江苏和浙江的慢性疼痛治疗效果较好,而西藏、青海、吉林、宁夏和新疆的治疗质量较低。北京、上海、青海、广西和湖南的慢性疼痛学科发展较好,而西藏、四川、内蒙古、河北和贵州较差。
中国经济发达地区的 CPHI 得分较高,而经济欠发达地区的得分较低。目前,经济发达地区的疼痛诊断和治疗情况较好,而经济欠发达地区则较差。根据中国不同省份人群慢性疼痛的流行情况和管理情况的变化,有必要实施因地制宜的慢性疼痛干预措施。