Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2022 Dec;34(12):3165-3169. doi: 10.1007/s40520-022-02281-y. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
In the Netherlands, it is customary to discuss directives regarding resuscitation, intubation, and ICU-admission with patients and/or their relatives upon hospital-admission. The outcome of this discussion is documented in a code status. Ideally, these advance care planning (ACP)-related decisions are made by a patient (and/or their relatives) and a professional together in a shared decision-making (SDM) process, to improve patient satisfaction and prevent undesired care. Given the bad outcomes in older COVID-19 patients, it is particularly important to discuss the code status upon admission. This study aims to describe the practice of SDM regarding code status during the COVID-pandemic. Specific aims were to find out to what extend patients took part in this decision-making process and whether all key elements of SDM for a shared decision were documented in medical reports.
In this retrospective cohort study, we included COVID-19 patients aged 70 years and older, admitted to two large teaching hospitals in the Netherlands, during the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Data about code status and the decision-making process were extracted from electronic healthcare records.
Code status was documented for 274 of 275 included patients. Patient participation in the decision-making process was described in 48%. In 19% all key elements of shared decision-making have been described. Key elements of SDM were defined as the presence of a completed code status form, the presence of clinical notes showing that both patient's wishes and values and the opinion of the healthcare professional about the predicted outcome was taken into consideration and clinical notes of a patient-healthcare professional interaction during the admission.
Our results show that a proper SDM process regarding code status is possible, even in hectic times like the COVID-19-pandemic. However, shared decision-making was not common practice in older patients with COVID-19 regarding code status (an ACP-related decision) in the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Only in 19% of the patients, all key elements of SDM regarding code status were described.
在荷兰,惯例是在患者入院时与患者和/或其家属讨论有关复苏、插管和 ICU 入院的指令。讨论的结果记录在代码状态中。理想情况下,这些与预先医疗指示(ACP)相关的决策应由患者(和/或其家属)和专业人员共同在共同决策(SDM)过程中做出,以提高患者满意度并防止不必要的护理。鉴于老年 COVID-19 患者的不良结局,在入院时讨论代码状态尤为重要。本研究旨在描述 COVID-19 大流行期间有关代码状态的 SDM 实践。具体目标是了解患者在多大程度上参与了这一决策过程,以及 SDM 所有关键要素是否都记录在医疗报告中。
在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们纳入了 2020 年 COVID-19 大流行早期在荷兰的两家大型教学医院入院的 70 岁及以上的 COVID-19 患者。从电子医疗记录中提取有关代码状态和决策过程的数据。
记录了 275 名纳入患者中的 274 名患者的代码状态。描述了患者参与决策过程的 48%。19%的情况下描述了共同决策的所有关键要素。SDM 的关键要素被定义为完成的代码状态表的存在、存在临床记录表明患者的意愿和价值观以及医疗保健专业人员对预期结果的意见已被考虑以及患者与医疗保健专业人员在入院期间的互动的临床记录。
我们的结果表明,即使在 COVID-19 大流行等繁忙时期,也可以进行适当的代码状态 SDM 流程。然而,在 COVID-19 大流行早期,关于代码状态(与 ACP 相关的决策),老年 COVID-19 患者的共同决策并不是常见做法。仅在 19%的患者中,描述了代码状态 SDM 的所有关键要素。