Department of Cell and Molecular Pharmacology & Experimental Therapeutics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA; Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
J Biol Chem. 2022 Dec;298(12):102661. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2022.102661. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
Mutations in one of the three RAS genes (HRAS, KRAS, and NRAS) are present in nearly 20% of all human cancers. These mutations shift RAS to the GTP-loaded active state due to impairment in the intrinsic GTPase activity and disruption of GAP-mediated GTP hydrolysis, resulting in constitutive activation of effectors such as RAF. Because activation of RAF involves dimerization, RAS dimerization has been proposed as an important step in RAS-mediated activation of effectors. The α4-α5 allosteric lobe of RAS has been proposed as a RAS dimerization interface. Indeed, the NS1 monobody, which binds the α4-α5 region within the RAS G domain, inhibits RAS-dependent signaling and transformation as well as RAS nanoclustering at the plasma membrane. Although these results are consistent with a model in which the G domain dimerizes through the α4-α5 region, the isolated G domain of RAS lacks intrinsic dimerization capacity. Furthermore, prior studies analyzing α4-α5 point mutations have reported mixed effects on RAS function. Here, we evaluated the activity of a panel of single amino acid substitutions in the α4-α5 region implicated in RAS dimerization. We found that these proposed "dimerization-disrupting" mutations do not significantly impair self-association, signaling, or transformation of oncogenic RAS. These results are consistent with a model in which activated RAS protomers cluster in close proximity to promote the dimerization of their associated effector proteins (e.g., RAF) without physically associating into dimers mediated by specific molecular interactions. Our findings suggest the need for a nonconventional approach to developing therapeutics targeting the α4-α5 region.
一个或三个 RAS 基因(HRAS、KRAS 和 NRAS)中的突变存在于近 20%的所有人类癌症中。这些突变由于内在 GTP 酶活性的损伤和 GAP 介导的 GTP 水解的破坏而导致 RAS 转移到 GTP 加载的活性状态,从而导致 RAF 等效应物的组成性激活。由于 RAF 的激活涉及二聚化,因此 RAS 二聚化已被提出作为 RAS 介导的效应物激活的重要步骤。RAS 的 α4-α5 变构叶被提出作为 RAS 二聚化界面。事实上,结合 RAS G 结构域内的 α4-α5 区域的 NS1 单域抗体抑制了 RAS 依赖性信号传导和转化以及质膜上的 RAS 纳米簇。尽管这些结果与通过 α4-α5 区域二聚化的模型一致,但 RAS 的孤立 G 结构域缺乏内在的二聚化能力。此外,先前分析 α4-α5 点突变的研究报告了对 RAS 功能的混合影响。在这里,我们评估了涉及 RAS 二聚化的 α4-α5 区域中的一组单一氨基酸取代的活性。我们发现,这些提议的“二聚化破坏”突变不会显著损害自身关联、信号传导或致癌 RAS 的转化。这些结果与一个模型一致,即激活的 RAS 原聚体在近距离聚集以促进与其相关的效应蛋白(例如 RAF)的二聚化,而无需通过特定的分子相互作用介导的物理关联成二聚体。我们的研究结果表明,需要一种非常规的方法来开发针对 α4-α5 区域的治疗方法。