Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington School of Medicine, 325 Ninth Avenue, Box 359911, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA.
Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Nov 5;22(1):1322. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08725-5.
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for psychosis (CBTp) is recommended by national treatment guidelines yet remains widely inaccessible in the U.S. A stepped care model, favored and feasible for other scarce interventions, may improve access to CBTp.
We employed an exploratory sequential mixed method design inclusive of two distinct phases to quantitatively evaluate the acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness of CBTp Stepped Care (CBTp-SC) among practitioners who were trained in low-intensity CBTp (Step 1), Group-Administered CBTp (Step 2), and Formulation-based CBTp (Step 3). In Phase 1, we queried respondents using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure, Intervention Appropriateness Measure, and the Feasibility of Intervention Measure to ascertain perceptions of these leading indicators of implementation success. In Phase 2, we conducted focus groups with CBTp-SC-trained practitioners (n = 10) and administrators (n = 2) from 2 of the 4 Phase 1 study sites to evaluate the theoretical assumptions of stepped care and to better understand key barriers and facilitators.
Forty-six practitioners trained in all three levels of CBTp-SC completed the online survey in Phase 1. All participants were employed by a community mental health agency currently sustaining CBTp-SC. Respondents endorsed high levels of acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness for the CBTp-SC model. We found evidence to suggest that licensed practitioners and Step 3 practitioners perceived formulation-based CBTp as more appropriate for their clients. In Phase 2, six themes emerged which affirmed the utility of the model for stakeholders, supported stepped care theoretical assumptions, and revealed key areas for improvement.
Early adopters of CBTp-SC in the U.S. perceive it to be acceptable, feasible, and appropriate in community mental health care settings. Practitioners and administrators identified training and implementation barriers, including the importance of organizational readiness, a CBTp coordinator role, and a desire to adapt the intervention. These early findings will facilitate iterative refinement of the stepped care model for U.S. public behavioral health agencies. Additional research is needed to explore perceptions and clinical outcomes among CBTp service users.
认知行为疗法治疗精神病(CBTp)被国家治疗指南推荐,但在美国仍广泛无法获得。阶梯式护理模式受到青睐,并且对于其他稀缺干预措施也是可行的,这可能会改善 CBTp 的可及性。
我们采用了探索性序贯混合方法设计,包括两个不同阶段,以定量评估在接受过低强度 CBTp(第 1 步)、团体实施 CBTp(第 2 步)和基于构想的 CBTp(第 3 步)培训的从业者中,CBTp 阶梯式护理(CBTp-SC)的可接受性、可行性和适当性。在第 1 阶段,我们使用干预措施接受度量表、干预措施适宜性量表和干预措施可行性量表询问受访者,以确定对这些实施成功的主要指标的看法。在第 2 阶段,我们与来自第 1 阶段研究的 4 个地点中的 2 个地点的 10 名 CBTp-SC 培训从业者和 2 名管理员进行了焦点小组讨论,以评估阶梯式护理的理论假设,并更好地了解关键的障碍和促进因素。
46 名接受过 CBTp-SC 三级培训的从业者完成了第 1 阶段的在线调查。所有参与者均受雇于一家社区心理健康机构,该机构目前正在维持 CBTp-SC。受访者对 CBTp-SC 模式的可接受性、可行性和适宜性表示高度认可。我们发现有证据表明,持照从业者和第 3 步从业者认为基于构想的 CBTp 更适合他们的客户。在第 2 阶段,出现了六个主题,这些主题肯定了模型对利益相关者的实用性,支持了阶梯式护理的理论假设,并揭示了需要改进的关键领域。
美国 CBTp-SC 的早期采用者认为它在社区心理健康护理环境中是可接受、可行和适当的。从业者和管理人员确定了培训和实施方面的障碍,包括组织准备就绪、CBTp 协调员角色以及对干预措施进行调整的愿望的重要性。这些早期发现将促进美国公共行为健康机构对阶梯式护理模式的迭代改进。还需要更多的研究来探索 CBTp 服务使用者的看法和临床结果。