Dammann J F, McAslan T C, Maffeo C J
Crit Care Med. 1978 Sep-Oct;6(5):293-310. doi: 10.1097/00003246-197809000-00001.
In four series of patients, the efficiency of ventilation of a sine wave without an end-inspiratory pause was compared to a square wave without a pause, a sine wave with a pause to a square wave with a pause, a sine wave to a sine wave with a pause, and a sine wave with a long pause to one with a short pause. The primary mode of evaluation was through simultaneous airway and arterial argon washout curves. Additional cardiopulmonary measurements were made. Results indicate: (1) a statistically significant improvement in ventilation with a sine wave with a pause; (2) a statistically significant improvement with the longer pause as compared to the short pause.
在四组患者中，对无吸气末停顿的正弦波通气效率与无停顿的方波通气效率、有停顿的正弦波与有停顿的方波通气效率、正弦波与有停顿的正弦波通气效率以及有长停顿的正弦波与有短停顿的正弦波通气效率进行了比较。主要评估方式是通过同步气道和动脉氩气冲洗曲线。还进行了额外的心肺测量。结果表明：（1）有停顿的正弦波通气在统计学上有显著改善；（2）与短停顿相比，长停顿在统计学上有显著改善。
