Kuriakose Steena, Krishnamurthy Arvind, Vinutha R S, Ramshankar Vijayalakshmi, Sekhar Shobana, Walia Gagandeep Kaur, Gupta Ruby, Aggarwal Aastha, Singh Ranjana, Rajan Sheril, Kondal Dimple, Grover Surbhi, Prabhakaran D, Dhillon Preet K, Shridhar Krithiga, Goodman Michael
Centre for Chronic Disease Control, C-1/52, 2ND FL, Safdarjung Development Area, Delhi 110016, India.
Cancer Institute (WIA), Adyar, Chennai 600036, India.
Cancer Epidemiol. 2022 Dec;81:102283. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2022.102283. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
Oral cancer, a leading cancer-site in India, is often detected at advanced stages. We evaluated the time intervals from first symptom to help-seeking and diagnosis among oral cancer patients.
In this cross-sectional study, we recruited 226 consecutive oral cancer patients (mean age ( ± SD) 51.9 years ( ± 10.9); 81.9% men; 70.3% advanced stage) registered for diagnosis and treatment, between 2019 and 2021 at a cancer care centre in South India. We used WHO framework and previously standardized tools to record time intervals (appraisal, help-seeking and diagnostic) and baseline characteristics. We utilized multivariable logistic regression models to test the associations between 'prolonged (i.e., over 1 month) time intervals') and patient-level factors to estimate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Over a half of patients presented with prolonged appraisal (60%) and help-seeking intervals (57%), and a third (34%) reported prolonged diagnostic interval. Patients with no formal education, no routine healthcare visits, no self-reported risk factors, and those who did not perceive initial symptoms to be serious were 2-4 times more likely to have prolonged appraisal and help-seeking than the rest. High travel costs and self-decision for visiting healthcare facility prolonged help-seeking. Diagnostic interval was prolonged only among women OR= 2.7 (95% CI: 1.2-6.1)) and in patients whose first doctor's opinion was 'nothing to worry' OR (=7.3 (95% CI: 2.6-20.5)). 'Correct knowledge of cancer' shortened appraisal and help-seeking intervals and 'incorrect knowledge and negative beliefs' prolonged diagnostic interval.
Our findings highlight that interventions targeting sociocultural and economic determinants, symptom awareness, sensitizing persons at risk (especially women) and primary care providers might reduce overall time to diagnosis. Further, patients without any known risk factors for oral cancer might be at-risk for prolonged appraisal interval. These might help inform 'pull' strategies for cancer control in India and similar settings.
口腔癌是印度主要的癌症类型之一,通常在晚期才被发现。我们评估了口腔癌患者从出现首个症状到寻求帮助及诊断的时间间隔。
在这项横断面研究中,我们招募了2019年至2021年间在印度南部一家癌症护理中心登记接受诊断和治疗的226例连续的口腔癌患者(平均年龄(±标准差)51.9岁(±10.9);81.9%为男性;70.3%为晚期)。我们使用世界卫生组织的框架和先前标准化的工具来记录时间间隔(评估、寻求帮助和诊断)以及基线特征。我们利用多变量逻辑回归模型来检验“延长的(即超过1个月)时间间隔”与患者层面因素之间的关联,以估计比值比(OR)及95%置信区间(CI)。
超过一半的患者存在延长的评估时间间隔(60%)和寻求帮助时间间隔(57%),三分之一(34%)的患者报告诊断时间间隔延长。未接受过正规教育、没有定期进行医疗保健就诊、没有自我报告的风险因素以及那些认为初始症状不严重的患者,其评估和寻求帮助时间间隔延长的可能性是其他人的2至4倍。高昂的交通费用和自行决定前往医疗机构就诊延长了寻求帮助的时间。仅在女性中诊断时间间隔延长(OR = 2.7(95% CI:1.2 - 6.1)),以及在首位医生认为“无需担忧”的患者中诊断时间间隔延长(OR = 7.3(95% CI:2.6 - 20.5))。“对癌症的正确认知”缩短了评估和寻求帮助的时间间隔,而“错误认知和负面信念”延长了诊断时间间隔。
我们的研究结果表明,针对社会文化和经济决定因素、症状意识、提高高危人群(尤其是女性)和初级保健提供者的认知的干预措施,可能会减少总体诊断时间。此外,没有任何已知口腔癌风险因素的患者可能存在评估时间间隔延长的风险。这些可能有助于为印度及类似环境中的癌症控制“拉动”策略提供信息。