STAR (Simple Trials for Academic Research) Unit, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Centre for Academic Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Lancet. 2022 Nov 5;400(10363):1597-1606. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01843-8.
Peptic ulcers in patients receiving aspirin are associated with Helicobacter pylori infection. We aimed to investigate whether H pylori eradication would protect against aspirin-associated ulcer bleeding.
We conducted a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (Helicobacter Eradication Aspirin Trial [HEAT]) at 1208 primary care centres in the UK, using routinely collected clinical data. Eligible patients were aged 60 years or older who were receiving aspirin at a daily dose of 325 mg or less (with four or more 28-day prescriptions in the past year) and had a positive C13 urea breath test for H pylori at screening. Patients receiving ulcerogenic or gastroprotective medication were excluded. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either a combination of oral clarithromycin 500 mg, metronidazole 400 mg, and lansoprazole 30 mg (active eradication), or oral placebo (control), twice daily for 1 week. Participants, their general practitioners and health-care providers, and the research nurses, trial team, adjudication committee, and analysis team were all masked to group allocation throughout the trial. Follow-up was by scrutiny of electronic data in primary and secondary care. The primary outcome was time to hospitalisation or death due to definite or probable peptic ulcer bleeding, and was analysed by Cox proportional hazards methods in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with EudraCT, 2011-003425-96.
Between Sept 14, 2012, and Nov 22, 2017, 30 166 patients had breath testing for H pylori, 5367 had a positive result, and 5352 were randomly assigned to receive active eradication (n=2677) or placebo (n=2675) and were followed up for a median of 5·0 years (IQR 3·9-6·4). Analysis of the primary outcome showed a significant departure from proportional hazards assumptions (p=0·0068), requiring analysis over separate time periods. There was a significant reduction in incidence of the primary outcome in the active eradication group in the first 2·5 years of follow-up compared with the control group (six episodes adjudicated as definite or probable peptic ulcer bleeds, rate 0·92 [95% CI 0·41-2·04] per 1000 person-years vs 17 episodes, rate 2·61 [1·62-4·19] per 1000 person-years; hazard ratio [HR] 0·35 [95% CI 0·14-0·89]; p=0·028). This advantage remained significant after adjusting for the competing risk of death (p=0·028) but was lost with longer follow-up (HR 1·31 [95% CI 0·55-3·11] in the period after the first 2·5 years; p=0·54). Reports of adverse events were actively solicited; taste disturbance was the most common event (787 patients).
H pylori eradication protects against aspirin-associated peptic ulcer bleeding, but this might not be sustained in the long term.
National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment.
接受阿司匹林治疗的患者发生的消化性溃疡与幽门螺杆菌感染有关。我们旨在研究幽门螺杆菌根除是否能预防阿司匹林相关的溃疡出血。
我们在英国的 1208 个初级保健中心进行了一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验(幽门螺杆菌根除阿司匹林试验[HEAT]),使用常规收集的临床数据。符合条件的患者年龄在 60 岁或以上,每天服用 325 毫克或以下剂量的阿司匹林(过去一年中有四个或更多 28 天的处方),且在筛查时 C13 尿素呼气试验阳性提示存在幽门螺杆菌感染。正在服用致溃疡或胃保护药物的患者被排除在外。参与者被随机分配(1:1)接受口服克拉霉素 500mg、甲硝唑 400mg 和兰索拉唑 30mg(活性根除)或口服安慰剂(对照组),每天两次,持续 1 周。参与者、他们的全科医生和医疗保健提供者、研究护士、试验团队、裁决委员会和分析团队在整个试验过程中均对分组分配情况进行了盲法处理。随访通过对初级和二级保健的电子数据进行审查。主要结局是因明确或可能的消化性溃疡出血而住院或死亡的时间,在意向治疗人群中采用 Cox 比例风险方法进行分析。该试验在 EudraCT 注册,注册号为 2011-003425-96。
2012 年 9 月 14 日至 2017 年 11 月 22 日,有 30166 名患者接受了幽门螺杆菌呼气检测,5367 名患者的检测结果呈阳性,其中 5352 名患者被随机分配接受活性根除(n=2677)或安慰剂(n=2675)治疗,并随访了中位数为 5.0 年(IQR 3.9-6.4)。主要结局的分析显示,风险比(HR)为 0.35(95%CI 0.14-0.89);p=0.028)。与对照组相比,在最初 2.5 年的随访中,活性根除组的主要结局发生率显著降低(确定或可能的消化性溃疡出血事件 6 例,发生率为 0.92[95%CI 0.41-2.04]/1000 人年;17 例,发生率为 2.61[1.62-4.19]/1000 人年;p=0.028)。在调整了死亡的竞争风险(p=0.028)后,这一优势仍然显著,但随着随访时间的延长而消失(在最初 2.5 年之后的时间段内,HR 为 1.31[95%CI 0.55-3.11];p=0.54)。积极征求了不良事件的报告;味觉障碍是最常见的事件(787 名患者)。
幽门螺杆菌根除可预防阿司匹林相关的消化性溃疡出血,但这种预防作用可能不会持续存在。
英国国家卫生与保健优化研究所卫生技术评估。