Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery Department, Sirio Libanes Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery Department, Sirio Libanes Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Chin J Traumatol. 2023 Jul;26(4):211-216. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2022.10.001. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
Non-prosthetic peri-implant fractures are challenging injuries. Multiple factors must be carefully evaluated for an adequate therapeutic strategy, such as the state of bone healing, the type of implant, the time and performed personnel of previous surgery, and the stability of fixation. The aim of this study is to propose a rationale for the treatment.
The peri-implant femoral fractures (PIFFs) system, a therapeutic algorithm was developed for the management of all patients presenting a subtype A PIFF, based on the type of the original implant (extra- vs. intra-medullary), implant length and fracture location. The adequacy and reliability of the proposed algorithm and the fracture healing process were assessed at the last clinical follow-up using the Parker mobility score and radiological assessment, respectively. In addition, all complications were noticed. Continuous variables were expressed as mean and standard deviation, or median and range according to their distribution. Categorical variables were expressed as frequency and percentages.
This is a retrospective case series of 33 PIFFs, and the mean post-operative Parker mobility score was (5.60 ± 2.54) points. Five patients (15.1%) achieved complete mobility without aids (9 points) and 1 (3.0%) patient was not able to walk. Two other patients (6.1%) were non-ambulatory prior to PPIF. The mean follow-up was (21.51 ± 9.12) months (range 6 - 48 months). There were 7 (21.2%) complications equally distributed between patients managed either with nailing or plating. There were no cases of nonunion or mechanical failure of the original implant.
The proposed treatment algorithm shows adequate, reliable and straightforward to assist the orthopaedic trauma surgeon on the difficult decision-making process regarding the management of PIFF occurring in previously healed fractures. In addition, it may become a useful tool to optimize the use of the classification, thus potentially improving the outcomes and minimizing complications.
非假体周围种植体骨折是具有挑战性的损伤。对于适当的治疗策略,必须仔细评估多个因素,例如骨愈合状态、种植体类型、先前手术的时间和执行人员以及固定的稳定性。本研究的目的是提出一种治疗方案。
根据原始种植体的类型(髓外与髓内)、种植体长度和骨折位置,为所有 A 型 PIFF 患者开发了一种治疗算法。使用 Parker 活动度评分和影像学评估分别在最后一次临床随访时评估提出的算法和骨折愈合过程的充分性和可靠性。此外,还注意到了所有并发症。连续变量表示为平均值和标准差,或中位数和范围,具体取决于其分布。分类变量表示为频率和百分比。
这是一项 33 例 PIFF 的回顾性病例系列研究,术后 Parker 活动度评分为(5.60 ± 2.54)分。5 名患者(15.1%)完全无辅助活动(9 分),1 名患者(3.0%)无法行走。另外 2 名患者(6.1%)在发生 PIFF 之前无法行走。平均随访时间为(21.51 ± 9.12)个月(6-48 个月)。并发症在接受钉内固定或钢板内固定的患者中各有 7 例(21.2%),无不愈合或原始种植体机械失败的病例。
提出的治疗方案具有足够的、可靠的和简单的特点,可以协助骨科创伤外科医生在处理先前愈合的骨折中发生的 PIFF 时进行困难的决策过程。此外,它可能成为优化分类使用的有用工具,从而有可能改善结果并最大限度地减少并发症。