• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根治性前列腺切除术中切缘阳性对 Gleason 分级组 4-5 的高/极高风险前列腺癌患者癌症特异性死亡率的影响。

Effect of positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy on cancer-specific mortality in high/very high-risk prostate cancer patients with Gleason Grade Group 4-5.

作者信息

Panunzio Andrea, Sorce Gabriele, Hoeh Benedikt, Hohenhorst Lukas, Tappero Stefano, Nimer Nancy, Rajwa Pawel, Tian Zhe, Terrone Carlo, Chun Felix K H, Briganti Alberto, Saad Fred, Shariat Shahrokh F, Cerruto Maria Angela, Antonelli Alessandro, Karakiewicz Pierre I

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Verona, Verona, Italy.

Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Prostate. 2023 Feb;83(3):268-276. doi: 10.1002/pros.24458. Epub 2022 Nov 6.

DOI:10.1002/pros.24458
PMID:36336728
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The effect of positive surgical margins (PSM) on cancer specific mortality (CSM) in high/very high-risk (HR/VHR) prostate cancer (PCa) with aggressive Gleason Grade Group (GGG) is unknown. We tested PSM effect on CSM in this setting, in addition to testing of radiotherapy (RT) benefit in PSM patients.

METHODS

We relied on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2010-2015), focusing on HR/VHR patients with exclusive GGG 4-5 at radical prostatectomy (RP). Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariable Cox regression models tested the relationship between PSM and CSM. Moreover, the effect of RT on CSM was explored in PSM patients.

RESULTS

Of 3383 HR/VHR patients, 15.1% (n = 511) exhibited PSM. Patients with PSM harbored higher rates of GGG 5 (60.1% vs. 50.9%, p < 0.001), pathologic tumor stage T3a (69.1% vs. 45.2%, p < 0.001) and lymph node involvement (14.1% vs. 9.4%, p < 0.001), relative to patients without PSM. PSM rates decreased over time (2010-2015) from 16.0% to 13.6%. Seven-year CSM-free survival rates were 91.6% versus 95.7% in patients with and without PSM, respectively. In multivariable Cox regression models, PSM was an independent predictor of CSM (hazard ratio = 1.6, p = 0.040) even after adjustment for age, prostate specific antigen, pathologic tumor stage and lymph node status. Finally, in PSM patients, RT delivery did not reduce CSM in either univariable or multivariable Cox regression models.

CONCLUSIONS

In HR/VHR PCa patients with exclusive GGG 4-5, PSM at RP adversely affect survival. Moreover, RT has no protective effect on CSM. In consequence, lowest possible PSM rates are crucial in such patients.

摘要

背景

在具有侵袭性 Gleason 分级组(GGG)的高/极高风险(HR/VHR)前列腺癌(PCa)中,手术切缘阳性(PSM)对癌症特异性死亡率(CSM)的影响尚不清楚。除了测试放疗(RT)对 PSM 患者的益处外,我们还在这种情况下测试了 PSM 对 CSM 的影响。

方法

我们依据监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库(2010 - 2015 年),聚焦于根治性前列腺切除术(RP)时仅为 GGG 4 - 5 的 HR/VHR 患者。采用 Kaplan - Meier 曲线和多变量 Cox 回归模型来测试 PSM 与 CSM 之间的关系。此外,还在 PSM 患者中探究了 RT 对 CSM 的影响。

结果

在 3383 例 HR/VHR 患者中,15.1%(n = 511)出现 PSM。与无 PSM 的患者相比,PSM 患者中 GGG 5 的比例更高(60.1%对 50.9%,p < 0.001),病理肿瘤分期为 T3a 的比例更高(69.1%对 45.2%,p < 0.001),淋巴结受累的比例更高(14.1%对 9.4%,p < 0.001)。PSM 发生率随时间(2010 - 2015 年)从 16.0%降至 13.6%。有和无 PSM 的患者 7 年无 CSM 生存率分别为 91.6%和 95.7%。在多变量 Cox 回归模型中,即使在调整了年龄、前列腺特异性抗原、病理肿瘤分期和淋巴结状态后,PSM 仍是 CSM 的独立预测因素(风险比 = 1.6,p = 0.040)。最后,在 PSM 患者中,单变量或多变量 Cox 回归模型中 RT 治疗均未降低 CSM。

结论

在仅为 GGG 4 - 5 的 HR/VHR PCa 患者中,RP 时的 PSM 对生存有不利影响。此外,RT 对 CSM 没有保护作用。因此,在这类患者中尽可能降低 PSM 发生率至关重要。

相似文献

1
Effect of positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy on cancer-specific mortality in high/very high-risk prostate cancer patients with Gleason Grade Group 4-5.根治性前列腺切除术中切缘阳性对 Gleason 分级组 4-5 的高/极高风险前列腺癌患者癌症特异性死亡率的影响。
Prostate. 2023 Feb;83(3):268-276. doi: 10.1002/pros.24458. Epub 2022 Nov 6.
2
Rates of Positive Surgical Margins and Their Effect on Cancer-specific Mortality at Radical Prostatectomy for Patients With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer.对于局限性前列腺癌患者,根治性前列腺切除术时切缘阳性率及其对癌症特异性死亡率的影响。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Feb;17(1):e130-e139. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.09.024. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
3
The Role of Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy for the Prediction of Clinical Progression and Cancer-specific Mortality in Node-positive Prostate Cancer Patients.根治性前列腺切除术后前列腺特异性抗原持续存在对预测淋巴结阳性前列腺癌患者临床进展和癌症特异性死亡率的作用。
Eur Urol. 2016 Jun;69(6):1142-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.010. Epub 2015 Dec 31.
4
Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on oncologic outcomes in patients with nonorgan-confined prostate cancer.阳性切缘长度和切缘处 Gleason 分级对非器官受限前列腺癌患者肿瘤学结局的影响。
Prostate. 2022 Jun;82(9):949-956. doi: 10.1002/pros.24341. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
5
Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on biochemical recurrence in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.切缘阳性长度和边缘处 Gleason 分级对局限期前列腺癌患者生化复发的影响。
Prostate. 2019 Dec;79(16):1832-1836. doi: 10.1002/pros.23908. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
6
Assessing the Impact of Positive Surgical Margins on Mortality in Patients Who Underwent Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: 20 Years' Report from the EAU Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group.评估机器人根治性前列腺切除术患者阳性切缘对死亡率的影响:来自欧洲泌尿外科学会机器人泌尿外科分会科学工作组的 20 年报告。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2024 Aug;7(4):888-896. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.11.021. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
7
Pattern of Biopsy Gleason Grade Group 5 (4 + 5 vs 5 + 4 vs 5 + 5) Predicts Survival After Radical Prostatectomy or External Beam Radiation Therapy.活检 Gleason 评分 5 级分组模式(4+5 对 5+4 对 5+5)预测根治性前列腺切除术或外照射治疗后的生存情况。
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 May;8(3):710-717. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.04.011. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
8
Presence of biopsy Gleason pattern 5 + 3 is associated with higher mortality after radical prostatectomy but not after external beam radiotherapy compared to other Gleason Grade Group IV patterns.活检出现 Gleason 模式 5+3 与根治性前列腺切除术后死亡率升高相关,但与其他 Gleason 分级分组 IV 模式相比,与外照射放疗后死亡率升高无关。
Prostate. 2021 Aug;81(11):778-784. doi: 10.1002/pros.24175. Epub 2021 May 31.
9
Survival after radical prostatectomy versus radiation therapy in clinical node-positive prostate cancer.临床淋巴结阳性前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术与放疗的生存比较。
Prostate. 2022 May;82(6):740-750. doi: 10.1002/pros.24317. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
10
Impact of surgical margin status on prostate-cancer-specific mortality.手术切缘状态对前列腺癌特异性死亡率的影响。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11):1684-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11371.x. Epub 2012 Jul 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic value and predictive model construction for patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy based on the preoperative NPL-IRS score and prognostic nutritional index.基于术前NPL-IRS评分和预后营养指数的腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术患者的预后价值及预测模型构建
Front Oncol. 2025 Aug 20;15:1603993. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1603993. eCollection 2025.
2
The 2012 Briganti nomogram predicts disease progression after surgery in high-risk prostate cancer patients.2012年布里甘蒂列线图可预测高危前列腺癌患者术后的疾病进展。
Arab J Urol. 2024 Apr 8;22(4):227-234. doi: 10.1080/20905998.2024.2339062. eCollection 2024.
3
The impact of mpMRI-targeted vs systematic biopsy on the risk of prostate cancer downgrading at final pathology.
mpMRI 靶向与系统活检对最终病理前列腺癌降级风险的影响。
World J Urol. 2024 Apr 22;42(1):248. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04963-w.
4
Prognostic factors among patients with pathological Grade Group 5 prostate cancer based on robot-associated radical prostatectomy specimens from a large Japanese cohort (MSUG94).基于日本大型队列(MSUG94)机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术标本的5级病理分组前列腺癌患者的预后因素
World J Urol. 2024 Mar 14;42(1):152. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04864-y.